“Calm And Insight” Chapter 8 From Buddhadhamma: The Laws Of Nature And Their Benefits To Life

This is the eighth chapter “Calm And Insight” from the book:

Buddhadhamma: The Laws Of Nature And Their Benefits To Life
by Bhikkhu P. A. Payutto (Somdet Phra Buddhaghosacariya)

Published by Buddhadhamma Foundation
Copyright © Buddhadhamma Foundation 2021
Translated by Robin Philip Moore

Editor: Bhikkhu Kovilo, typesetting: Bhikkhu Gambhīro

Download this e-book in PDF, EPUB and MOBI formats at the following address: https://buddhadhamma.github.io

This is a gift not for sale / to be sold. I just read it and claim zero copyright. Please support https://www.buddhadhammafoundation.com


Audio: “Calm And Insight” Chapter 8 From Buddhadhamma: The Laws Of Nature And Their Benefits To Life

Death, Breath, and Awakening: From Punk To Zen And Mindfulness Yoga | Anapanasati Series With Frank Jude Boccio

(Ai helps sum up nicely thus:) Zen and yoga teacher Frank Jude Boccio and I chat about the intersections of mindfulness, yoga, and Buddhist practice. Frank shares his journey from the punk scene in New York to decades of teaching meditation and yoga, influenced by Thích Nhất Hạnh and Zen traditions. We explore mindfulness of the body, contemplations on death, the breath as practice, challenges with meditation, and integrating awareness into daily life through micro-practices. Frank also reflects on sound meditation, student–teacher relationships, and the liberating power of aligning with impermanence and truth. [There’s also kind of a punk rock moment when my camera falls over]


0:00 – Introduction & weather chat
2:48 – Who is Frank Jude Boccio?
3:27 – Early life, punk scene, sister’s death, discovering Buddhist practice
4:24 – Influence of Thích Nhất Hạnh and Satipatthana
6:01 – Vietnamese Buddhist traditions (Mahayana & Theravada blend)
7:23 – Teaching mindfulness with a Mahayana heart
8:31 – Yoga background and integrating mindfulness
10:01 – Mindfulness Yoga explained
12:07 – Mindfulness of the body, inner smile practice, body image
14:14 – Elements practice & contemplation of death
16:12 – Reflections on mortality, impermanence, and non-fear
20:06 – The Five Remembrances & cancer diagnosis
23:01 – Breath and death awareness
24:07 – Zen story: breath and urgency
27:03 – Teacher-student relationships in Buddhist traditions
29:41 – Frank’s approach to teaching Anapanasati
31:16 – Shamatha practice distinctions
33:27 – Jhana controversies & Abhidhamma insights
36:14 – Challenges with basic breath practice
37:05 – Informal practice & micro-practices (tooth brushing, bells of mindfulness)
40:33 – Common challenges: controlling the breath
43:42 – Breath focus at nostrils, belly, and hara traditions
47:01 – Eyes open vs. closed meditation styles
48:26 – Sound meditation & equanimity
52:42 – Concentration vs. mindfulness: funnel vs. hourglass metaphor
55:17 – Earworms & pop music in meditation
56:12 – Humor and ease in Zen teaching
57:26 – Frank’s offerings
1:01:27 – Closing blessing & dedication of merit


Frank Jude Boccio’s Website: mindfulnessyoga.net

Book: Mindfulness Yoga: The Awakened Union of Breath, Body, and Mind (Wisdom Publications)
Publisher link | Amazon link

Articles/Essays: Boccio has contributed to Yoga Journal, Tricycle, Shambhala Sun, and anthologies like 21st Century Yoga and Freeing the Body, Freeing the Mind.


Audio: Death, Breath, and Awakening: From Punk To Zen And Mindfulness Yoga | Anapanasati Series With Frank Jude Boccio


Unedited transcript via YouTube:

welcome. This is Josh Depold of Integrating Presence and today I have Frank Jude Boshio with me. Frank, what’s

going on today? Uh it’s a pretty warm day here. I’m in Tucson and uh it’s between rains like in

in the summer we get like this heat that builds up with humidity and then there’s

a big storm and then for a few days it’s like really cool and nice and then it builds up again. And uh one of my one of

my friends was like saying this time it feels like it’s taking too long, you know, like as well as she put it for

play is going on too long. She just wants the rain, you know, and that’s how I think we’re all feeling.

Well, maybe there’s more tension building then. Um, but yeah, it’s it’s been hot here in Prague, too. Um, I

think we’re supposed to, Speaking of that, we’re supposed to get rain. Uh, they’re calling for a chance tomorrow and things will cool down a little bit,

but I don’t think anything like the Tucson heat. I I can’t imagine. And coming from Denmark, too, um, where it’s

really nice and cool. So I honestly in Missouri weather I’m not missing it at all honestly. But

Missouri was pretty humid right? Ah yes it’s really humid during the during the summers for the most part.

Really cold too in the winter but yeah everybody talks about like well he where you are it’s hot but it’s dry heat. And

I was like dry heat at 110 degrees is still hot. It’s like you’re in an oven

you know. Yeah. It’s like opening the oven up. Yeah. But what they don’t understand is that in the summer when it’s the hottest

is also when it’s the most humid. So yeah, and um a little bit of

technology here. We have swamp coolers. I mean obviously wealthier people have ACs, but like and so swamp coolers work

really well when it is hot and dry because what they do is they suck the hot dry in air in. They pass it through

this like organic material and then it blows into the house cool

moisture air, right? So, you have to keep your windows open, which I like because AC it’s so claustrophobic. But

when it’s humid, they’re not as effective. So, the time when you want it the most, they don’t really work as

well. It It’s called a swamp cooler. Yeah. Yeah. Evaporative cooler, but

Okay. Evaporative cooler. I have to check these out because in in Missouri, you know, it’s it’s Yeah. We want less

swamp. And people say it’s because of all the artificial uh corn or some I’ve just heard that recently. So much corn

gives off so much transpiration and that’s why a lot of um weird humidity in Missouri. I don’t know if there’s

anything to that, but either way, yeah, hot. So, so here here we are in in

wherever the weather is where you’re at listening to this, I hope it’s okay enough. And I’ll ask you the standard

question that I often do. And who is Frank and what kind of work does he do?

Well, Frank is uh it’s taken me a longer time because I

grew up at a time where we wanted to be assimilated, but um I’m second

generation Italian uh American and uh born in New York, raised in New York. Uh

went through uh the whole punk scene. I was a DJ, right? But what got me into

Buddhist practice was that I did have a half sister who was about 15 years older than me who died of uh cancer when I was

16. And uh it’s a very familiar story. I mean like I can’t believe how you more

and more whenever I read about things it’s like what leads people to practice often is some kind of loss. you know,

Dogen was because he was an orphan and the Buddha himself when he recognized that we’re all going to die, you know.

Continue reading “Death, Breath, and Awakening: From Punk To Zen And Mindfulness Yoga | Anapanasati Series With Frank Jude Boccio”

Aspects Of Metta (Loving-kindness) | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #34


In this thirty-fourth installment of the ongoing live series with Wendy Nash inquiring into meditation practice on and off the cushion we delve into the various aspects of Metta / Loving-kindness ranging from the more common place to those that may be not as well known and the many aspects in-between this boundless, immeasurable state. Share whatever you’d like about Metta in the comments or just watch to help strengthen your own practice


Some of our past chats related to metta:


*There’s naturally an ongoing open call for meditation (related) questions for the (roughly) monthly “Meditation Q & A” either by the various social media means listed; integratingpresence[at]protonmail.com or just showing to type/ask live.*



Background

Regular, current and past visitors to Integrating Presence may recall the monthly series “Ask Us Anything” I did with Denny K Miu from August 2020 until January 2022 — partially including and continuing on with Lydia Grace as co-host for awhile until March 2022.

For a few months thereafter I did various Insight Timer live events exploring potential new directions and/or a continuation of the Ask Us Anything format while weaving in other related teachings to these events.

Then, after chats with meditation coach Wendy Nash, it became clear to start a new collaboration similar to “Ask Us Anything” simply and clearly called “Meditation Q & A” especially due to the original intent of the Ask Us Anything’s being “discussions about meditation and related topics.”



Playlist of past chats with Wendy:



Audio: Aspects Of Metta (Loving-kindness) | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #34

Or listen via Insight Timer (app or website)


Unedited transcript via YouTube:

Welcome. This is Josh Integrating Presence and Wendy Nash is back again with me. Wendy, what’s up?

Well, just before you came on air, I got half an hour ago, I got an email from my

accountant. It’s tax time. And she said, “Here are the queries that we have. You

need to send this more information.” And I went, “Ah.” And I tried to get everything done. And I just I just need

to get that one little thing done and I’ll do it after the show.

Yeah. I know how frustrating that is cuz I had to file a extension for my taxes and I finally got that done. Excuse me.

And what a relief that is to finally get that done. I know what it’s like to have that last little piece and then just

like I’m going to get it done. So you have that to look forward to after this. Do you My voice is Go ahead.

Husky. Husky. So just waking up here I So I’m here on Gubby Gubby country in Queensland in

Kabula and I wanted to know whether in so in Australia everybody has to submit

a tax return every year. I don’t know if that’s the case in the US. You know I mean basically if you’re

alive you need to pay taxes. Um you know I think it’s if you owe taxes then you

need to file them and pay them. There are instances where you don’t. Like for

me, I’m a unique case right now because um I’m not making enough uh money what

I’m doing now to to make a living from it. However, because I have a business,

quote unquote, you know, or actually technical business, I have to file. So, I have to spend all this time, all my

time collecting everything that I’ve done, you know, with my website, with

online, with with training. And I have to report it all. Even though I don’t owe any money, I still have to. And then

I I don’t want to do this. So I pay someone luckily I have someone that’s um fairly affordable to compile all the

proper tax forms. I mean it’s enough for me just to go through gather all the information and submit it to them and

kind of have it worked out so where they’re not spending so much time and understand all the different things to

report. So to me it’s it’s kind of ridiculous. Um but you know and then the Danish tax system is it’s really unique.

It’s really complex but I think it’s really efficient too. So I don’t know enough about it to speak too much about

that but they say what the death and taxes are the only certainties in life really kind of a cliche but uh yeah

well in in Australia most people you have an accountant and they find you’ve

done research and it’s like you use an accountant and you actually get a better return. So most people use an

accountant. In Australia, everybody has to submit um a tax return except it

might not be for people with disabilities. So So we have some responses here. Okay.

Gamers team has says, “Hi bro, how are you?” Well, even there’s

bro gal. So brah brah. Yeah. Um

being inappropriate. I know. I mean, uh, this is guys talk to each other. Not really appropriate here,

but anyway. Hey, um, you know, if the spirit’s good, hey, how’s it going? U Melissa Reed chimed in, I think, on the

last one, and she said she enjoyed it and made we made some good points. Looking forward to the next one. So,

that’s cool. So, let’s let’s jump into it here. And, uh, taxes or no taxes. And

I I’m pretty sure in Denmark the the scat the the Danish t which is interesting because they also call their

loved ones scat, but it’s also the name of the tax system which I think is brilliant by the way.

Yeah. Yeah. It’s it’s it’s I think it’s pretty much everybody can just go online and do it

themselves unless it’s really complex. So, it’s kind of the same way in America. If you don’t have too much, I

mean, if you’re just an employee, you have one tax form, I think, and not a very complicated finance finances, then

it it is fairly simple and you can do it yourself. But, I mean, a lot of people do opt to have either a full

professional accountant or like me, I have a it’s almost like a financial adviser in and a tax filer. So, so it’s

not a full-blown CPA certified public accountant. That’s really kind of hardcore, but you know that you’re going

to get kind of But yeah, so this is somewhere in between. And then you can just actually have a friend who really

likes numbers and know what they’re doing, you know, help you out and file it for you, I guess. Yeah. Hey, we’ve got some responses here. So,

apparently we have an extraordinary number of deductions that you can claim. So, our tax system is really

um overly generous and uh yeah, there’s a lot of conversation about that at the

moment. Sure. Yes, we have some comments. So, Zoom 2944 says, “Hello.” Hello. Back. Gamers

team replied, “You are girl.” So, at least we know it’s a person now, not a um not a bot, which is always nice.

Interesting English, by the way, though. You are girl. Okay. All right. Well, you know, you don’t know where people come from. You know what? It’s

like you don’t speak your Danish is a bit rough and rusty. So, there you go. Well, non-existent, basically. But,

yeah. There you go. So, there you are. Your Danish is the same. And um Mrs. Reed is

hi Wendy, hi Josh. Well, hello Mrs. Reed. Lovely to have you here. And post your questions. We will answer them in

real time. So or any comments. But I love the questions.

It is. And I actually got one the other day when I was doing um a live event on loving kindness. I can bring that in

here too and get uh bounce it off you. Let me read the quick intro I have here. Um, in this 34th installment of the

ongoing live series with Wendy Nash, inquiring into meditation practice on and off the cushion, we plan to delve into various aspects of meta loving or

loving kindness, ranging from the more common place to those that may be not as

wellknown and the many aspects in between this boundless immeasurable state. Please join to share whatever you

like about meta or just help strengthen your own practice. So this is um you know I would love to

even go on a retreat to just do in just one second get the screen bigger here. Um to just do meta on a retreat and I’ve

never done one of these to just dedicate entire retreat. I would love to do that. So the the question I got the other day

though I might as well just jump into that since this is a Q&A is um somebody said basically along the lines what

happens if you’re being too passive and people are walking all over you and

Yeah. And so this is um this is what I say all the time. I basically said, well, you know, if you’re being abused,

you have to get out of that situation no matter what. If you stay on the couch or whatever of a friend, but it basically

said, “No, I’m not that. It’s just so then I we talked about boundaries, which is what we talked about in the last

thing, and actually uh being assertive.” So some people really have a hard time like speaking up or a challenging time

speaking up and being assertive while other people are the other way around where they need to dial it down and they

come off too harsh and yeah but it’s for this the more passive it’s about asserting a boundary and then

strengthening it and saying hey you need to respect this boundary or otherwise I can’t you know take other tactics to to

to reinforce that. Yeah. So, so how how do you view this, Wendy? If if someone

feels and and meta kind of gets a bad rap, a loving kindness thing. Oh, people are going to take advantage you. That’s

one of the most common criticisms we hear. I mean, I can respond to that, but I want to hear what you have to say first with it.

Yeah. So, boundaries, I always think about it as if you love a child, do you

let them eat ice cream every day for every meal? And of course, if you love your child, you’re not going to do that.

you create you you know that what is the thing you know they have to eat vegetables and different grains and meat

and all these things to be healthy. So I think that we do know boundaries

instinctively when it comes to that. I think sometimes it can be difficult to know how to

speak up without being aggressive. Um or because I think we we can be quite

anxious about how do we do it and we bottle it up and bottle it up and bottle it up and then finally we say something

and it all comes out wrong because we haven’t said it when it’s a tiny little thing, we’ve said it when it’s like kabang. So I think it’s an a learning

curve to experience and to play with. Personally, that’s what I think. And I

think that um it’s it’s hard sometimes to even know whether

you have whe whether you’re whether you’re in abu in an abusive relationship. So, I was in an abusive

relationship once and it took me 10 years to figure out how abusive it was cuz that it was very subtle and I

thought, “Oh, I can’t say.” It was very subtle abuse. So, and it

made me understand how do people get into abusive relationships and how difficult it is to get out and how I can

be difficult. So, I think um if you are planning to leave an

abusive relationship, I think it’s really important to call the hotlines and the support lines. There are people who do amazing things and they will help

Continue reading “Aspects Of Metta (Loving-kindness) | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #34”

Mystery, Mindfulness, Liberation & Everyday Dharma | Anapanasati Series Premiere With Stephen Fulder

(Ai basically summarizes thus:) In the premiere episode of this Anapanasati (Mindfulness of Breathing) series I welcome renowned Dharma teacher Stephen Fulder. Drawing from 50 years of practice, Stephen shares his journey discovering Dharma in India during the 1970s, founding Israel’s Insight Society, and teaching amid conflict. He offers a heartfelt, unstructured approach to Anapanasati, emphasizing breath as a simple, direct gateway to body, feelings, mind, and Dharma—mapping it lightly to the Four Foundations of Mindfulness without rigid steps. 

Key insights include celebrating impermanence as liberation, balancing effort with trust (saddha), and awakening feminine qualities like allowing (yoniso manasikara). Stephen highlights breath’s role in thriving through hard times, fostering kindness, and connecting to life’s web. He also discusses his new book, How to Thrive in Hard Times, and upcoming online events. Perfect for practitioners seeking practical, inspiring guidance on breath meditation.

And these reflective questions for deepening:

  • “Can you sense who’s in charge of this breath or who’s breathing?”
  • “What is the breath, is it a thing or is it a mystery?”
  • “What’s the celebration, the joy in the being as we breathe?”

0:00 – Introduction & Welcome: Stephen’s sense of blessing amid hard times.

2:00 – Who is Stephen Fulder?: Mystery of self, Dharma journey, founding Israel Insight Society.

5:00 – Discovering Dharma in India: Psychedelic roots, Goenka retreats, and grounded practice.

10:00 – Anapanasati Overview: Unstructured approach, breath as garden gate, body as entry.

15:00 – Mapping to Four Foundations: Breath with body, feelings, mind, and Dharma insights.

20:00 – Impermanence & Liberation: Observing arising/ceasing, dispassion, and letting go.

25:00 – Breath in Everyday Life: Trust (saddha), feminine awareness, thriving in conflict.

30:00 – Closing: Breath’s role in peace, book/events mention, and well-wishes for awakening.


https://www.stephenfulder.com

https://www.facebook.com/StephenFulderAwakenNow

https://www.instagram.com/stephenfulder/

https://www.youtube.com/@DrStephenFulder

https://insighttimer.com/stephenfulder



Audio: Mystery, Mindfulness, Liberation & Everyday Dharma | Anapanasati Series Premiere With Stephen Fulder

Or listen via Insight Timer (app or website)



Unedited transcript via YouTube:

record button here. Wholeness, welcome. This is Josh of Integrating Presence and today I have

Stephen Fulder with me today. Stephen, how’s it going today? Uh fine. Really okay. I feel uh blessed

day by day even though times are really hard but uh I don’t take it too

personally. Um and uh life is still a blessing.

Well, cool. And that’s the way I feel most times when I’m um have a lot of stuff cleared out of the way. The reason

I reached out to Stephen today, if that’s okay, I haven’t called call you that even though you’re a doctor, right? Too. Um

it’s it’s true. Yes. Yes. Okay. So um I want to do a series

on anapanosati since it’s been my primary practice for the past couple years and I just wanted to reach out to

different teachers lay monastic just to get other perspectives and maybe tips

and uh techniques uh foundations anything that anybody wants to share

about it I want to give a space and learn from that but I want to keep with

my standard format here to start off. Who is Steven and what kind of work does he do?

Thank you. I have to say Steven is an utter mystery after being in this body for

nearly 79 years. Um Steven is uh actually it’s just a label.

I don’t feel full of the Stevenness.

Um uh I’m Jewish. So I remember asking my father one day is this finger Jewish

one how do I know and it’s a bit like that with the Steven is this finger Steven or not so after

basically 50 years of uh practice in the dharma

which I met in India as um an academic actually I was teaching in Indian universities in 7576

um and I met the dharma there and then I’ve been very engaged with the dharma.

Came actually to Israel by more or less by accident. Karma sort of dumped me in

Israel and I found myself in the beginning of the 80s as the only Buddhist in Israel except I heard that

uh um that the prime minister uh Bengurion

also had been in Burma and said I know how to do bipassa.

But anyway, uh then I started the Israel Insight Society uh which has become

basically the biggest organization in Israel for practice of I would say practical dharma, mindfulness,

awareness, meditation and the and the real deep practice of dharma. Um so I’ve

been practicing and teaching for the last 30 years writing books etc. Um, and

uh, Steven, as I say, is this mystery of I tell you why it’s mysterious. Because

labels don’t really do the job. They’re just another mind. They’re just another

concept. And I’m I’m celebrating the concept. I can celebrate the concept of

Steven, but I don’t believe it. When I look out of the world, I don’t

look out with eyes of Steven. I look out with the eyes of life that looks at

life. It isn’t Steven looking at life. It’s life looking at life. So I have to

say that as a kind of a a caution in relation to that word, this person

that’s beautiful and I always kind of say, well, labels are helpful at times. We pick them up, but we know when to put

them down and to know that they’re just labels, right? So yeah, you beautifully

Continue reading “Mystery, Mindfulness, Liberation & Everyday Dharma | Anapanasati Series Premiere With Stephen Fulder”

Immigration, Dharma, Health, Societal Change, & Unleashing Inner Glory: Reunion Talk with Denny Miu

(Apologies for some of the vague statements I give. Please just use them as a starting point for research) (Ai mostly sums it up thus:)

Enjoy this heartfelt reunion conversation with meditation teacher and Dharma friend Denny K Miu. After years apart, they dive into their shared history during the CO-V lockdowns, Denny’s evolving political awareness, and how Buddhist principles like wisdom, compassion, and harmony can help navigate the fear and division following Trump’s re-election. From personal immigration stories to globalization’s impact on the middle class, societal grievances, and practical health tips via Denny’s N.E.U.R.O framework, this talk blends spirituality, politics, and self-care. Discover how to “unleash the glory within” through meditation, emotional intelligence, and equanimity amid uncertainty.


0:00 – Introduction & Reunion: Catching up on friendship and past “Ask Us Anything” sessions during lockdowns.

5:00 – Pandemic Reflections: How COVID sparked their online presence and meditation adaptations.

10:00 – Political Shift: Denny’s increased focus on politics post-Trump re-election, viewing it as a new wave of fear and uncertainty.

15:00 – Executive Orders & Dictatorship Concerns: Discussing lawlessness, intimidation, and the erosion of checks and balances.

20:00 – Global Perspectives: Bewilderment from Asia/Europe on U.S. changes; Denny’s 50+ years as an immigrant.

25:00 – Societal Changes & Immigration: Neighborhood shifts, racism, and the myth of “illegal immigrants” vs. criminality.

30:00 – Globalization’s Toll: Loss of middle-class jobs, union decline, and the shift from governance to grievance politics.

35:00 – Hidden Influences: Tech figures like Peter Thiel & Elon Musk, Project 2025, and moneyed “games” in politics.

40:00 – Emotions in Politics: Politics as an “emotional con game” like Hollywood; addressing fear, attachment, and the five hindrances.

45:00 – Meditation & Dharma Application: Wisdom vs. compassion, changing ourselves first, and emotional intelligence.

50:00 – What You Consume Consumes You: Reacting internally to external events; harmony as a bridge.

55:00 – Brahma Viharas & Practice: Loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, equanimity, and daily reflections.

1:00:00 – Health & Longevity (N.E.U.R.O Framework): Nutrition, Exercise, Unwinding, Restorative sleep, Openness; balancing sympathetic/parasympathetic systems.

1:05:00 – Harmony in Society & Planet: From personal health to communal empathy; America as a “failed experiment” needing balance.

1:10:00 – Reflections on Death & Paradoxes: Integrating mortality awareness with health pursuits for deeper freedom.

1:15:00 – Closing: Unleashing inner glory, metta practice in real life, dedicating merit, and farewells..


https://www.youtube.com/@thus_i_recorded

https://dennykmiu.com/saturday

https://insighttimer.com/dennymiu

https://www.patreon.com/dharmaSF


Audio: Immigration, Dharma, Health, Societal Change, & Unleashing Inner Glory: Reunion Talk with Denny Miu

Unedited transcript via YouTube:

Introduction & Reunion: Catching up on friendship and past “Ask Us Anything” sessions during lockdowns.

again. None other than Denny came. You Denny, what’s happened? I I’ I’ve been here. It’s just that

you’ve been disappearing on me. Oh, okay. Yeah. Well, no, this is this

is the thing with with friendships, right? Like um it it hurts. I don’t put the burden on myself or you.

And I think this is a sign of friendship, too, where we could reach out after years and then it’s almost

like no time has passed. You know, we we only been chatting a couple minutes before the show and I I lost Josh. I lost track of the

things that you kind of um uh uh encouraged me to do. You know, things

like insight timer things. Oh, I I I lost track. It just there’s so many different things you said, Denny, you

got to do this. I said, “No, no, no, no, no.” He said, “No, you got to do this.” And then it becomes that thing. You

know, it is. So if for those of you are who are new to I guess either of our work um

Denny and I used to do a ask us anything for uh for years and especially it was

during the uh the lockdowns the some people call it scandmic even and uh it

helped it helped me anyway I can’t speak for Denny but it helped me get through that it was a huge support and um so

yeah Denny you want to say something about that and then I guess we’ll just jump right into your your work I think and um I guess If this is if this is for

new, you might uh give people a quick background on yourself. I I guess one I my understanding is that

one of the reason that Josh reached out to me is that um in addition to a small

change in his life um you know he’s he’s been out at the United States and and

then you know as you look back and you see some of the uh the work that I’m doing now that tend to uh be a little

bit more political or at least be more aware of the uh political um scenario

happening in United States. And I if I understand correctly, you kind of say, “Hey, Danny, you know, why can we just

have a conversation on that?” Right. But but in any case, um you mentioned about

the pandemic. I I actually remember the the day that San Francisco uh started

the lockdown and I believe that it was either February or January 23rd, 2000.

And it No, 200. No. What is it?

Yeah. I think probably what wasn’t it two was No, it wasn’t 2000. It was it was it was uh 2020.

Well, that’s what I Sorry. That’s what I we were both thinking the same thing, but Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. 2000 was another

another so many things happen. Another end of the world. Yeah. I I think I think you and I got together

because um it just it was the right thing to do, you know, because um all of

a sudden you have this huge event, people don’t don’t understand what’s going on. There’s a lot of fear. there’s

a lot of um um fear mostly fear and then and then uh and then we we were used to

doing physical things and then we got locked down so you and I kind of both started this online uh presence and and

it was in in a way it was quite new and how do you do meditation how do you

start a class on meditation online when you can’t even feel the other person right and so um I I I think the pandemic

or however you want to characterize it, it was a major event in our life that

caused a lot of fear and I think when if you want to um come back to what’s

happening in the United States with the with the new freely elected president, I want to keep that in mind, you know. So

I mean I I I uh I have to accept that that he was you know unless unless we

discover something we don’t know or or we prove something that we thought we know but in any case the man is

reelected but I think of it as as as the pandemic number two you know 2.0 in that

it it caused a lot of fear as well and fear and certainty and and so forth. So

Continue reading “Immigration, Dharma, Health, Societal Change, & Unleashing Inner Glory: Reunion Talk with Denny Miu”

Is There A “Buddhist” Eschatology? Between Buddhas: A Somewhat Long View Of Cosmic Timelines

For those who’d rather not listen and/or potentially have more coherence here’s how AI edited my reflection (with slight edits from me):

It’s early August 2025, and I want to start with a disclaimer. Some of you might hear this and think, “That’s pretty woo-woo, tripped-out speculation—cool, far-out stuff, man.” Others might think, “This is just noise—random, unhelpful proliferation of thought.” Both reactions are valid. If you’re already feeling one of those responses, you might even want to stop listening now.

That said, I will share something more practical toward the end.

What I’ve been contemplating lately is only really relevant within Buddhist cosmology and certain Buddhist paths—or at least what we call “Buddhist” paths. And, of course, if my understanding here is shaky or inaccurate, I’m open to correction.

This reflection is about the long view—the vast cycles—and the idea of a Buddha’s sāsana, the dispensation of their teachings. In traditional accounts, it’s predicted that our current Buddha’s dispensation will eventually fade away. That naturally raises the question: what does that mean for practice?

For those who haven’t yet decided whether to pursue the arahant path—aiming for full awakening as soon as possible—or the bodhisattva path—delaying full awakening to help all beings—there’s an obvious truth: we simply keep practicing. When the time comes, it seems we’ll choose (or remember) the right direction then.

This led me to think about eschatological groups—“end-times” movements—that believe the quicker the world becomes depraved, the sooner a savior will come. As far as I know, such groups don’t exist in Buddhism, but it made me wonder: could there be skillful or unskillful versions of “Buddhist eschatology”? What are the pros and cons of prolonging a Buddha’s dispensation? And what are the pros and cons of letting it end sooner?

Of course, thinking too much about this bumps into one of the imponderables— contemplation of the complete, full, total extent of karma—which can lead to confusion or even madness. So this is just a light reflection, not something to dig deeply into.

There’s also the teaching (in Theravāda, at least) that only one Buddha—whether a sammāsambuddha or a paccekabuddha—arises at a time. If I’m getting this right our current sammāsambuddha, formerly Siddhartha Gautama, was preceded by a paccekabuddha, and when his dispensation ends, maybe there witll be paccekabuddhas again before the next sammāsambuddha, Metteyya (Maitreya).

And here’s where speculation becomes even less practical. In Theravāda, there’s no public record of who will be the Buddha after Metteyya. Maybe it’s not helpful to project that far ahead, since our present thoughts, speech and actions—done with intention—carry the real weight of consequence.

Still, for those on the bodhisattva path, vast timelines can be both daunting and inspiring. The idea that there are many advanced bodhisattvas “waiting their turn” invites awe, humility, and maybe even a bit of healthy urgency. For arahant-focused practitioners, it might strengthen the resolve to reach liberation quickly, without dragging things out.

Then there’s the question of the in-between—the period after Metteyya’s dispensation ends but before the next Buddha arises. What would that transition be like? Could it be fertile ground for preparing the bodhisattva path? Or would contemplating it be a distraction from the work at hand?

In the end, I don’t have answers—only questions that briefly drew my attention today. And maybe that’s enough. If any of this sparks something useful in your own practice, all the better.

May all beings everywhere realize awakening and be free.


Audio: Is There A “Buddhist” Eschatology? Between Buddhas: A Somewhat Long View Of Cosmic Timelines

Or listen via Insight Timer (app or website)


Boundaries | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #33


In this thirty-third installment of the ongoing live series with Wendy Nash inquiring into meditation practice on and off the cushion we delve into boundaries, especially as they relate to mindfulness, empathy, and personal/professional relationships. Wendy has mentioned previously that she often explores this theme in her work with clients and that it resonates strongly with many people. We also touch on loss, recovery, honesty, etc.


*There’s naturally an ongoing open call for meditation (related) questions for the (roughly) monthly “Meditation Q & A” either by the various social media means listed; integratingpresence[at]protonmail.com or just showing to type/ask live.*



Background

Regular, current and past visitors to Integrating Presence may recall the monthly series “Ask Us Anything” I did with Denny K Miu from August 2020 until January 2022 — partially including and continuing on with Lydia Grace as co-host for awhile until March 2022.

For a few months thereafter I did various Insight Timer live events exploring potential new directions and/or a continuation of the Ask Us Anything format while weaving in other related teachings to these events.

Then, after chats with meditation coach Wendy Nash, it became clear to start a new collaboration similar to “Ask Us Anything” simply and clearly called “Meditation Q & A” especially due to the original intent of the Ask Us Anything’s being “discussions about meditation and related topics.”



Past chats with Wendy:



Audio: Boundaries | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #33

Or listen via Insight Timer (app or website)


Unedited transcript via YouTube:

integrating presence joined with Wendy Nash once again. Wendy, how’s it going?

I’m good. I’m here on Gabby Gabby Country in Queensland. So, it’s winter. I’m cold. What can I

say? My cat’s got the the heated rug. It’s so wild. Uh I haven’t been to the

Southern Hemisphere yet, and here in in Denmark, uh it’s such a nice It almost seems It’s summer, but it seems almost

like a spring day so far. But this Nordic sun is uh it’s no joke, you know.

I I think it’s it’s fairly intense. Uh it’s deceptively intense because the the air temperature is nice and cool. Uh so

then I think, oh, the sun’s not as bright as it is, but it’s early in the morning here, so it’s it will get more

intense. So this will be the perfect time to be out in like this today. And today we’re talking about boundaries.

So, my little thing is my little description

here. In this 33rd installment of the ongoing live series of Wendy Nash, inquiring into meditation practice on

and off the cushion, we plan to delve into boundaries, especially as they relate to mindfulness, empathy, and

personal professional relationships. Wendy has mentioned previously that she often explores this theme in her work

with clients and that it resonates strongly with many people. And I thought before we get into this, we could uh I

would just mention a couple um like physical boundaries and things. And so that’s not what we’re going to be

talking about today, but just kind of as a more solid reference point. I mean, the most immediate one is the one behind

me. It’s a hedro. You can’t really see it without context, but our little garden here is fenced in by hedro. And

this is a foreign thing. Like in America, it’s very rare. There’s fences. Usually people make fences, either white

picket fences or animal fences for fields. There’s not a lot of hedgeros,

but they’re everywhere. Like in Denmark, in England, and I would assume other places in Europe, too. I haven’t been to

too many places, but this is like a um a noticeable physical boundary that divides one idea or group of land to

another. And then in the States, we have what’s called Well, we have country boundaries. Wendy, did you Oh, you’re

you’re still Everything’s okay. I’m I’m still here. I’m just There’s I’m reading a book about uh called Something

Between Us, and it’s um something about the everyday walls of American

um of American life and how to take them down. So, and they’re the invisible ones, you know, it’s racism and it’s

also cars and it’s also it’s very interesting. So, um I’ve just started.

Continue reading “Boundaries | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #33”

Catalysts For Awakening And Change Series: From Autopilot To Awareness: Ivor “Gently’s” Inner Upheaval Into Intuition, Insight And Radical Responsibility

(Ai assisted summary/description:) In this candid and expansive conversation I reconnect with Ivor “Gently”—writer, meditator, and deep contemplative—who shares the extraordinary journey that led him from a mainstream life to a radical shift in perception and purpose. What begins as a tale of inner restlessness unfolds into a profound spiritual emergency, filled with synchronicity, energetic upheaval, and the collapse of a materialist worldview

We explore:

  • The intuitive unraveling of identity and belief systems
  • Sudden versus gradual awakenings
  • The role of long-term vs. short-term thinking in ethical decision-making
  • How real transformation demands both radical responsibility and humble openness
  • The dynamic tension between individual growth and collective well-being
  • Meditation as intuitive surrender—not just technique

Ivor brings a fresh, heartfelt perspective to the spiritual path, grounded in real-life challenges and supported by intense meditative discipline. Whether you’re a seasoned practitioner or just exploring mindfulness, this episode invites deep reflection on how we live, choose, and grow.

🧭 Topics: Insight meditation, spiritual emergency, karma, intuition, Buddhist retreat experiences, cause & effect, and what it means to live for the whole rather than just the self.

🧘‍♂️ Find out how trusting your gut might be your most powerful guide.


Audio: Catalysts For Awakening And Change Series: From Autopilot To Awareness: Ivor “Gently’s” Inner Upheaval Into Intuition, Insight And Radical Responsibility

Unedited transcript via Riverside.fm:

Josh Dippold (00:01.494)
Holness welcome. This is Josh, Interskilled and Integrating Presence. And today I’m joined by Ivor. Ivor, what’s happening?

Ivor (00:10.898)
Hey Josh, nice to see you again.

Josh Dippold (00:13.662)
Likewise, Ivor and I, let’s just, his pen name, right, Ivor Gently, which I think is a really beautiful pen name there. And Ivor and I met like roughly over two years ago now at Amravati, which is a Buddhist monastery outside of London in the Thai forest tradition of Ajahn Chah. We had some quite lively conversations, I’ll say that. We actually kind of butted heads on something. I don’t know if

Ivor (00:15.422)
His pin name, right? I for Jit.

Josh Dippold (00:42.478)
We’re going to go into that today or not, probably not. So I invited him to do this. thanks for doing this, because we were talking before the show. This takes a somewhat degree of courage. Some people won’t even ever consider anything like this. But some people doing it the first time, it does take a little bit of courage, even though maybe two or three people might see it. But who knows? Thousands, you never know, really. So why don’t you tell people about the standard question. I’ll stick with, who’s Ivor?

Ivor (01:06.686)
So why don’t you tell people about, and this is standard question I’ll stick with.

Josh Dippold (01:11.49)
What kind of work does he do?

Ivor (01:13.694)
Yeah, it’s a tricky question for me, right? You can answer it in many ways. You know, in my typical answer, actually, when it comes to anything that I produce, it’s almost like it doesn’t matter who I am, right? It’s about what you’re saying, it’s about what you’re like, if you’re writing a book, it’s about what the book says rather than who you are.

And to me, it’s almost like it’s a bit of a problem that all of us have in society when we focus too much on individuals and not enough on what they’re saying or what they’re doing or what they’re… Even in politics, It’s all about character rather than… Or perceived character rather than the actual thing that they’re promoting.

But but okay, I’m gonna I’m gonna follow the format so basically I would say I spent the first 30 days 30 years of my life like kind of being a very very mainstream kind of normie Having that kind of life and Then certain things clicked not to go into too much detail but

basically I underwent a like what I would consider a very deep transformation where everything basically changed my perception of reality changed and it was almost like I started my life from the beginning it was really like another person from that point on so that was about 20 years ago

And so the first 30 years of my life I don’t even want to talk about it because in a way it’s like I kind of identify with that. In a way I could almost say that was kind of a waste. But you can also say that nothing is really a waste and you needed all of that. And then for the last, since that transition it’s really been about the spiritual realm.

Ivor (03:35.185)
Broadly speaking.

And yeah, I tend to live quite a hermetic life, you know, that I try to interact with external reality or with the society as little as possible, but it just kind of comes naturally. Like I just prefer to stay as much out of it as I possibly can. And…

And yeah, just kind of try to interact with reality on a very intuitive way. And I would say really focus more on the being than on the doing.

Josh Dippold (04:26.039)
Well, right on. Now, when you say hermetic life, you don’t mean that’s as kind of like a hermit would, not the esoteric hermeticism, right? You’re probably familiar with hermeticism too, which is, they are, I mean, you can be a herm…

a hermit into hermeticism, or you can be a hermeticist that’s very public and outgoing, right? So you’re talking about just being a hermit. I have actually studied a little bit of hermeticism, but that might be besides the point.

So let’s talk about, I think the question that’s dying to be posed here, if I can use that phrase, what brought about this change, this huge change? Because it’s it’s kind of similar in my life. I had this huge transformation happen in my life as well. So in a way, it’s quite similar. Would you be comfortable with mentioning anything about that and what happened and what got, what?

Ivor (05:24.285)
Sure.

Josh Dippold (05:29.815)
turns you down the path that you’re down today, if that’s the right way to put it.

Ivor (05:35.685)
Yeah, I would say I was, you know, the environment where I grew up, which was basically in Central Europe, in a very normal, you know, very mainstream family, kind of atheistic, materialistic, like there was nothing spiritual or esoteric or anything like that whatsoever. And very kind of, I was always

rational, know, very rational into all these analytical or logical things, so very mind oriented, left brain oriented.

So I was in an environment which is very different from where I am now but it’s almost like that environment didn’t allow me to go into that direction, into the spiritual direction but I would say it was always kind of brewing, you know, there were like hints here and there, were like glimpses I remember I would watch a movie, something like for example the first time I watched Vanilla Sky and I was like wow, this is like and it had all kinds of weird sensations

that I never had before. You it’s like something hits you. It’s like you get something which you can’t really explain. You feel, wow, there’s something here. So there were those kinds of things happening. And then there was just an overwhelming feeling that the life that I’m living, which was kind of very mainstream, you know, you could say fairly successful. I was an IT consultant, you know, very comfortable in all ways.

And most people thought, wow, he’s doing really good. And for me, there was this really strong nagging feeling like, what am I doing? It’s like I’m living on autopilot. And it wasn’t something that I chose. It wasn’t a result of anything I read or any people that I met. It was just a strong inner feeling. And then it just became stronger and stronger. And finally, I couldn’t even stay in that job. So I just…

Ivor (07:41.211)
left everything and I went traveling and then during that travel basically the whole kind of structure of my life you could say the ego structure but not just in a psychological sense also in the sense of my conception of reality and how it works it just completely collapsed so that at some points it felt I actually was kind of worried about my mental sanity I thought I was going crazy

Because some parts of that experience seemed at that time almost like paranoid schizophrenia. You know, for example, I’ll give you an example just to illustrate what I mean. I saw that there was a very clear connection between my inner processes, like my thoughts, and what was actually happening externally, like in real time, right? Which my previous model of reality just didn’t allow for that.

So when you see that it’s like, okay, is this Truman show is like what’s going on, right? So it’s that kind of it’s because I especially because I wasn’t ready But someone who’s been in contact with this with those kinds of notions You know might not feel that that’s so strange But for me that was just so so beyond anything that that I that I thought was possible That it just collapsed my whole world worldview

Which until that point, like I said, was very materialistic, very kind of… I’m not too good with these philosophical concepts, but I don’t know if there’s a thing that’s called randomistic, like the random universe, the idea that… Maybe it’s called determinism. I don’t know what it’s called, but the idea that things are happening randomly and there’s a separation between my internal life…

and the external life, right? That was my previous understanding of how reality works and there was absolutely no doubt that that’s how it works and then my actual experience was just like in my face completely clear that that’s just not how it is but like I would literally have a thought and then like two seconds later that thing happened and it just it wasn’t just one thing it just kept happening, right? So

Ivor (10:08.542)
That’s kind of what triggered this. I mean that was a part of it. There were also all kinds of physical or you could say physio-psychological things happening like all kinds of very intense sensations and you know people would call it energies or openings or It was like you know I think some people call it a spiritual emergency Which then goes into spiritual emergence

It felt like a breakdown, it felt like it could have been a breakdown. And I think if I was in a wrong situation, I could have ended up in a mental institution. And I would say many people who are in mental institutions have probably gone under some kind of process like that and just kind of couldn’t find the right angle.

Josh Dippold (10:49.006)
you

Josh Dippold (11:01.806)
Well, I like this term spiritual emergency because you’re illustrated so well. If there’s no reference points before, you’ve lived this way, that separation you’re talking about, and then all of a sudden some very profound things start happening.

It happens so quickly, it’s not as gradual as some people do in their practice, right? Some people are in practice to gradually wake up over a long time and some people have sudden awakenings. I don’t know if it’s a true awakening, but something happened where it happened quickly and some people call these things like Kundalini Syndrome.

where this force will rise so quick and one’s not really prepared to deal with it, doesn’t have any reference points, hasn’t read or had spiritual teachings that talk about this mirroring effect you’re talking about, like I guess you’d call law of reciprocity or as within, as without. mean, some people take these teachings too as metaphorical or only maybe 3 % or 5 % of that, right? But sometimes they can be

quite dramatic and then the amount of synchronicity that can happen too. Certain things can be quite synchronic, synchronous, I don’t know the word here. A lot of synchronicity can happen in a short amount of time and that can be very…

confusing and puzzling too. So how did you eventually deal with this? you tell anybody about it? Did you start studying? When this stuff started happening, how did you go about it? Did you mention it to anyone? How did you know who to talk to and who not to talk to about it as well? Yeah.

Ivor (12:56.765)
Well, it’s interesting, you you kind of transported me back into that point of time, which was a very special time in my life. Right, because it is really like the feeling of, wow, I was blind and now I can see, you know. I mean, that was a part of it. And then the other part was like deep confusion and even kind of worry, like what’s going on with me. And then, so this was in Thailand, actually.

on the island of Koh Phangan on like a pretty remote beach which in and of itself was like it was actually a perfect place for that kind of thing and then there was a guy living in the bungalow next to me with a shaved head and like really sparkling eyes

And you know, I never talked to him, I noticed him, and he noticed me, and then one day I just decided I’m just gonna go and talk to him. And I just told him for no special reason what’s going on, and he looks at me and he says, have you met God? I’m like, what do you mean? And basically, so up until that point, I wasn’t really even familiar with anything about Buddhism or any other religion for that matter, even though like, know, nominally.

I was supposed to be Catholic, but I was never interested in any of that So I knew nothing about Buddhism or anything, know, it wasn’t interested at all but then he gave me some books and there was a Buddhist meditation retreat on the island and There was there was like an actual 10-day retreat in just starting in a few days and I was like, know what? I’m gonna try that and and so and and that guy really seemed to kind of know something that I didn’t know

So that’s how I started meditating. And I think that really kind of stabilized me, you know, because then you see actually all of these things that you’ve been kind of intuitively, you know, downloading. Well, I mean, they’re all in the, you know, the Buddha was talking about that, right? So that kind of made me realize, okay, I’m probably not going crazy.

Ivor (15:12.115)
This is just really some kind of an intuitive opening that I’m going through. And then over time things just stabilized. So after this happened, I really started meditating a lot. And my format was doing meditation retreats, usually 10 days. And I would just do them sometimes back to back. I think in the first two years I probably did like 15 of them. At least 10, maybe 15.

And that became, you know, basically what my life was about. And I would say to some extent it never changed, you know. At some point, so that was 20 years ago, so at some points, you know, I did kind of get lost again in the world of Babylon. But I never really lost that connection. And I would say over time it only kind of became, things became clearer and just calmer.

you know, just normal.

Josh Dippold (16:16.559)
We’re right on. So I, can just say this, right? Go Inca. This is, this was a Go Inca retreat that was going on in this island. No, it was something else. Okay.

Ivor (16:16.991)
So.

Ivor (16:23.036)
No, no, this was, no, it was something else, yeah.

Josh Dippold (16:27.631)
I was going say, because usually a GoInco practitioner wouldn’t mention God, one of the first things. I would think that would be highly unlikely, or maybe not. I don’t know. But you have done that tradition too. So you’re, would say, a fairly hardcore meditator, or was at one time. I mean, you have a deep sitting practice, from what I remember talking to you. So I guess…

Ivor (16:34.183)
Right.

Josh Dippold (16:52.621)
That’s what I’m most interested in. I guess tell me about your practice, you know, from when you first started to if you have a daily sitting practice, the different retreats you’ve gone on.

I guess if you’ve had any teachers, just basically anything you want to say about it. And then what have you been practicing lately? And then if, I guess maybe any quote unquote successes or breakthroughs or maybe aim of practice. So just basically anything you want to say about it, I think.

Ivor (17:26.001)
Okay, so the retreat on Koh Phangan was run by a Western couple. So it was within a Buddhist monastery on the island, but they themselves were not monks and nuns because they were married. But they were organizing the retreat, so it was definitely not typical. And it was very much focused, so it was a 10-day retreat which they called Vipassana retreat.

But there was a lot of what they call loving kindness meditation, guess what people would call a meta practice.

And I would say I was blessed by being introduced to the world of spirituality and Buddhism through that kind of quite unconventional, like non-sectarian way. Right? Because they weren’t into building their own group and building a of a cult. There was nothing sectarian about it. They were just holding retreats. I mean, okay, they did have some assistance and…

You know, they did have their own group, but it wasn’t about

kind of increasing their little thing, their little fringe Buddhist sect.

Ivor (18:44.807)
And they encouraged people to go to other retreats, which I did, right? So I went to a few different retreats. So I went to a place called, all in Thailand, there’s a place called Suan Mok that is based on the teachings of Ajahn Budhadassa. And then there’s another place in the north, which is also kind of associated with Budhadassa, but slightly different. That was in Doi Sutep. I think now they do it in another place, but I forgot the name.

And then I went into Gwenca. So I saw that each of those places were kind of doing their own thing, right? Both theoretically they were kind of focusing on different things and also practically. Like for example some people, some of them would do a lot of walking meditation, kind of half walking, half sitting. Some of them would do no walking meditation at all.

Some of them would do a lot of concentration, like Samatha practices. Some of them would really say that the Samatha is just preparation for reflection, right, the wise reflection, which they included meta practices in that. And, you know, some people say, you know, there is a popular opinion that if you do too many different things, you’re never really gonna deep.

dig a hole deep enough and I see that point. But from my perspective I think it was really beneficial to see all these different ways of looking at it. Because I think that really, and that just works with my personality because I do like to have a free mind, know, really allow myself to explore everything and not fall into any bubbles.

Josh Dippold (20:37.679)
Well, how do you know what to go deep on if you’ve only had just a sampling of a couple things? You know, if you happen to get it right right off the bat, then you’re really fortunate. But if you get into something that you commit to for a long time, that’s, you know, going to take you far where you need to be, then yeah, it helps, especially starting off to familiarize yourself or oneself with a huge territory and then yeah, then choose from there, I feel, you know, like so I’m on the same page as you.

Ivor (21:06.407)
Hmm. Yeah, and I saw, know, in some of these, let’s call it traditions or branches, you know, they’re very specific about this is the only way to do it and all the other ways are pretty much wrong or are not going to lead to a good result. And so, you know, I had the benefit of seeing other things beforehand so that I knew this was not really, this doesn’t work for me, right?

But let’s say if you start in that kind of a tradition that has this kind of view, this is the only way, this is the only right way.

it may be likely that you’re going to be limited in your understanding.

Josh Dippold (21:54.245)
Yeah, this is what I tell people. mean, that’s a huge claim because I’ve met a few that is traditions, lines of approach that make that huge claim. that’s it really gets the attention, obviously. And so the way I look at that is if they’re right,

If it doesn’t say they happen to be right, well, then I’m going to miss out big time. However, if, they’re wrong and then I buy into that and then it’s almost like, okay, well, I just.

That’s not completely true. So it’s really hard to know, you know, so I don’t want to be totally dismissive, but it’s a high bar, right? That’s a huge claim. If you’re going to make that claim, you better be, you know, super serious about keeping it because that’s it. I don’t know of any other claim that could be as strong as that.

Yeah, I don’t, my heart doesn’t leap up at people that make that claim. However, if I were to have some kind of defense to it, if it really is, then it will give it could give people a really good motivation to stay with it. However, it’s not the good it’s not a way to bring in beginners, you know what I mean? And it’s

Yeah, we can all see the downsides of that, think. I just don’t want to write it off wholesale because if they really, if it somehow happens to be, well, then I’m the one and everybody else is missing out for not doing it. So this is why what this whole thing is pointing to is discernment. So is my wisdom and discernment sharp enough to know with absolute certainty the same degree of certainty that they’re claiming? And I would say, no, my wisdom and discernment is not on that level.

Ivor (23:18.527)
Some happen.

Josh Dippold (23:40.841)
where I could make be 100 % sure one way or another. You know what I mean? So that makes it even more challenging for me. But I would just recognize, OK, my level of discernment and wisdom is not enough to make that call. And if it’s not a cult, I will go check them out and just incorporate what’s useful from that. And until I can make that call, then I don’t need to make that call. You know what I mean? I will just, OK, that’s that. And so, yeah.

Ivor (23:57.569)
them out and just incorporate what’s useful from that and until I can make that call, then I don’t need to make that call. You know what I mean? I will just, okay, that’s that. And so, yeah.

Josh Dippold (24:09.61)
find my place in whatever, you know, so yeah, these are these are all really good points. So I guess now what is your do you so you talk more about intuitive. So, you know, for years of my practice, what I was doing is when I was sitting down every day to practice, I would just

Ivor (24:12.212)
Yeah, these are all really good points. So I guess now what is your…

Josh Dippold (24:30.976)
say either right before I sat down or when I sat down, okay, this is what I need to focus on in my meditation. And then that would be the meditation. And there was lot of upsides to that. But for the past few years, I have just been doing a strict Samha to practice because I haven’t stuck.

been that committed with one thing in my practice. So I thought I would give it a go doing a dedicated thing on a Panasati, traditional Vasudev Manga, and just give it a go for a while. So tell me about your practice today then and how you approach practice. And then if you want to incorporate that into the intuition we were talking about before too.

Ivor (25:12.104)
Yeah, so just to add something to the previous conversation about what’s the right path. Well, I would say there’s a few fundamental questions. One is the kind of the nature of knowing. How do we know anything? There’s the discernment. There’s the analytical, logical knowing.

And I would say there’s intuition which is quite separate for me. It’s really feeling based. It’s difficult to put your finger on it. It’s like gut knowing. And so that’s really where I trust that more than I trust anything that my mind says or that any other person says. And I’m kind of happy. I I obviously tried both approaches but overall I’m happier with the results that I get when I follow my gut.

my intuition, okay, what feels right? And to me it just doesn’t feel right when someone else is telling me how to meditate, like it’s just not really acceptable. Because I feel the whole point of meditation for me is to really not do anything to let it be done by itself. I don’t know, maybe that’s not the best way to phrase it, but.

to not even direct my attention but to completely let go and let that other force, whatever you want to call it, the not me, kind of take over. And I would say all the big insights that I had were never a result of me thinking about stuff. It was always what felt like a spontaneous download, just like a spark.

And so that’s really what I trust. And I feel even defining, like if you say this is the right path, okay, the right path to where? I mean, do we even agree on where we’re actually going, right? Because then the same people who tell you this is the right path, then they will also define the goal, right? Which they will usually say, it’s enlightenment or something like that.

Ivor (27:25.248)
And I would even question that premise, you what does that even mean? Like what does that look like? There’s a lot of assumptions here which are not actually intuitive. You need to mentally and intellectually accept a certain concept that you don’t actually know is true in order to even follow that kind of an approach. And so to me what feels much better is just to really be down to earth as much as possible and just take it day by day.

and see the improvements in my life, like that’s really for me that’s the goal, you know? I see there’s an aspect of my life that doesn’t work well and that’s what I want to change and for me that’s good enough and that is the goal as far as I’m concerned. You know, I don’t even want to think about enlightenment. I mean that’s just another concept. Not to put it down, I’m not saying it’s made up, but it’s just it’s just too far from my actual experience.

And I think it could be a trap, you know, it could be just a trap of the mind where the mind uses, in a way it’s almost like another form of separation, right? Because that concept separates you from the here and now. And for me it’s like this, you know, this is the point, right? And then this then translates to the kind of practice that I want to be doing. I want to be doing the kind of practice that helps me have a better life.

tomorrow and next week and again it’s a question of definition what does that even mean a better life well I would say it means more peace of mind it means more clarity like very practical things even like material things it means more abundance it means just better physical health, emotional health like simple things it doesn’t have to be super grandiose

Right? And I think many people maybe, you know, their view of enlightenment is that it’s something very special and like, you know, super extraordinary, when in fact, maybe that’s not what it is or what it needs to be at all, you know? Maybe it is more about something that’s actually very natural to us.

Ivor (29:51.553)
This is why I really always like the teachings of Ajahn Sumaito because that’s how I understand him Right like like some of the things he says is basically enlightenment is now and

I don’t wanna misquote him. But to me, I’m kinda closer to the approach that is less directed at something very special. Does that make sense?

Josh Dippold (30:22.129)
Yeah, it does. There’s so much you put in there. Yes, first off, I want to agree with you that it needs to be beneficial, right? So what you’re talking about, in my experience, have actually just been the side effects of meditation. Another approach, I’ll probably make a little bullet points here, is this all for me?

Am I doing this for my own ends or am I doing this for my own welfare and happiness? But that will also be for the welfare and happiness of others. And then the big thing though is long-term, you know. So if we go into this notion of past lives, future lives, and no discernible beginning, no discernible end,

You know, and it’s it’s it’s if that’s the case and it’s even crazier how we’ve forgotten all this, you know, so for me, my personal thing, yeah, it’s great to improve my life and it has improved my life. But at the end of the day, is it if that is the case where it’s just lifetime after lifetime, then how does that help me in the really long term? You know what I mean? Yeah, it seems like it’s going to have that. The other thing that came up when you’re talking there is faith, you know.

Ivor (31:29.406)
No.

Josh Dippold (31:36.242)
So this is a huge thing on the path that I really don’t have I’m working on faith right now too because there’s just certain things that are beyond me, you know, and this is where I can look at people on the path and I look at them not to put them on a pedestal or something, but you can kind of see how they are. They exemplify things, you know, they’re like a living embodiment of what’s possible. I mean, I guess we don’t have as many of these role models and practitioners, but there are very wise people, very loving people in the world.

that I’m nowhere near, not that we need to copy them or anything, but these are people that we can consult and bounce off to get their feedback because, I totally agree with the intuition and knowing. However, I would say that until I have a certain degree of clarity and think purity, then what my intuition will say will not always be the

best thing. not saying the analytical mind will either, you know what I mean? So yes, why I know that even some of these suit to you know, truth has to be known like in the body ultimately. But if there’s anything

You know, how does that work? My wisdom isn’t there to know how that works. You know what I mean? Also, if we go into like metaphysical things and I just open myself up to whatever there is, then some things in the unseen world that I don’t know how operate, you know, how do I know for sure that some kind of forces or causes and conditions are acting through me or, you know, either for my benefit or not for my benefit. So that’s a whole nother realm that I

Ivor (32:57.377)
Also, if we go into metaphysical things and I just open myself up to whatever there is, then some things in the unseen world that I don’t know how operate, how do I know for sure that some kind of forces are causing

Josh Dippold (33:22.233)
not qualified to know about, but I know some people that are and I can see kind of the access to information that they have and in their practice and what they’re capable of that they can tap into things that I’m not capable of now. So just because I can’t see it and know it in my experience doesn’t mean that it’s not there and something to pay attention to.

Ivor (33:28.385)
see the access to information that they have in their practice and what they’re capable of that they can tell.

Josh Dippold (33:47.79)
So those are a few things. There was a few other things that were in there, what you said, but those are things that I want to raise. Like, I guess the biggest thing is where is faith on your path and have you identified certain people or things in your life that you want to aspire to? I think the other thing to mention is this notion of, yeah, this, is kind of almost heady and abstract in a way. I think there’s a clearly defined thing in Therabata though, stream entry, you know, this is something that’s more relatable to people.

Ivor (33:47.81)
Those are a few things. There were a other things that were in there that you said, but those are things that I want to raise. Like, I guess the biggest thing is, where is faith on your path? And have you identified certain people or things in

Oh, I think the other thing to mention is this notion of the black, yeah, it is kind of almost heady and abstract in a way. I think there’s a clearly defined thing in here about those stream entries, you know. This is something that’s more relatable to people.

Josh Dippold (34:17.773)
and it’s more clearly defined and capable and I think it’s doable. One of the things of Dhamma is it’s…

visible here and now. You don’t have to wait. You can verify it. It has to be verified. Like you’re saying, the most important thing you’re saying, I feel, is that this all needs to be seen and known for oneself. We can’t go to an outside source to get ultimate authority and have it handed down. This needs to be seen and known for each wise one for themselves. And like you mentioned the Kalama Sutra to me, too, it needs to be for the long-term welfare and happiness of myself and others. But how long term are we going to go?

and he also says you have to see and know it for yourself in that sutta too. So all these things are… and then with the analytical mind one thing I might also put to you is how do you see merging these things or do you see it’s helpful instead of splitting off the analytical mind or the tendency, left brain tendencies and then with the spiritual? Is there a way to bring these together?

Ivor (35:03.425)
So all these things are, and then with the analytical mind, one thing I might also put to you is, how do you see merging these things? Do you see it’s helpful instead of splitting off analytical mind?

Josh Dippold (35:26.159)
do you see or do they need to be kept separate in one kind of vilified and the other raised up and pursued? Or how do you see that kind of dichotomy?

Ivor (35:39.297)
There’s so much there, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Josh Dippold (35:40.015)
So lots of stuff there, I know. That all came from what you were talking to as well. So yeah, any of that’s cool to address.

Ivor (35:48.477)
Okay, so let’s start with faith.

Ivor (35:54.773)
You know, I think real faith is actually knowing.

Ivor (36:00.979)
When you have true faith, you know something. And I know this is contrary maybe even to the definition of faith in the dictionary. But if you believe something, if you choose to believe something, and then that’s your faith, I think you’re lost. You know?

Josh Dippold (36:23.469)
I would totally agree. These are two separate things. Belief is the enemy of knowledge, right? We don’t need to believe or disbelieve. But faith is not belief or disbelief. To me, faith means, I see something. I know that I’m not there. This looks like it’s beneficial. How do I get there? I can’t bridge that gap now, but…

It’s possible, And the Buddha said, you know, I wouldn’t teach this if it wasn’t possible. So I have to have faith because I’m nowhere near that level. You know, it doesn’t mean I have to believe what he says. Every single thing that he shares has to be tested and seen and known directly for oneself, not believed in because he said it, right? It has to be verified in one’s own experience. So to me, that’s faith. Because if you believe it or disbelieve it, that’s completely beside the point. I don’t go around telling people I believe in bicycles, right? No, because I’ve seen a bicycle, I’ve got on one, I’ve ridden

that I know it directly. don’t have to believe it or disbelieve it anymore.

Ivor (37:18.945)
Well and that’s what gives you faith I would say, right? Like I have what I would call faith in some principles of how the universe works which happens to align with what some other people have said but the reason I have faith is not because they said it the reason I have faith is because I’ve experienced it so many times and so clearly that I would just say well I know that that’s how it is so for me that’s really faith so… That’s called verified faith just so you know that Okay

Josh Dippold (37:22.139)
Exactly.

Josh Dippold (37:45.439)
That’s called verified faith, just so you know the correct terminology. That’s verified faith, and that’s right. That’s something that it should be verified. It should be verified with wisdom. It’s not blindly take it. No blind faith. That’s not encouraged at all.

Ivor (37:55.335)
Exactly, yeah.

Ivor (37:59.668)
Right, so on some level I would say there’s, as far as I can see, there’s no real distinction between wisdom and faith. Maybe, I guess when people look at me and the way that I live, know, people that surround me, that live quite differently from my lifestyle, they usually describe me as, you know, having a lot of faith or even religious, which I wouldn’t describe myself like that.

To them it looks like I got faith, I think they see reality like I see it. So they think I’m operating from faith when actually I’m operating from what I truly, I would say no to be true.

Josh Dippold (38:44.946)
Yeah, these faculties balance each other, Because, yeah, faith is verified with wisdom, and if I don’t have the wisdom, then I have the faith until I can get to the wisdom. You know, they kind of balance each other there, the faculties, yeah. But no, yeah, yeah, I totally see what you’re saying, totally, yeah.

Ivor (38:56.277)
Okay.

Ivor (39:01.419)
No, yeah,

Ivor (39:05.119)
Yeah, I would say I’m probably very much focused on the wisdom element here. And then, well, faith. Yeah, again, would say faith to the extent that it’s not based on wisdom is probably, at least I’m talking for myself, based on some kind of intuitive knowing. Like intuitively, I feel I should go there. So maybe that’s faith. I don’t know.

But again, it’s not really an intellectual thing. I think faith that’s based on rational and analytical deduction, to me that’s just not really where I want to be. Based on what I’ve tried in my life, I’ve tried that approach. And it just didn’t really work very well. And I see this is usually where people get lost. They get lost in one of those bubbles because that’s what I believe.

And oftentimes there is a group dynamic, right? There’s a sect, there’s a group. And well, my group believes that, so I got faith. And I don’t know, it’s just not my way, you know?

Josh Dippold (40:14.082)
Totally agree. Not everything can be comprehended with rationality and logic. There’s way more subtle, profound things where it’s not the right tool. You don’t cut a cake with a chainsaw. yeah, it’ll be really messy and not helpful. Yeah, totally agree there too.

Ivor (40:23.842)
Yeah.

Ivor (40:32.694)
And then you brought another, a few very interesting points when you were talking about long term versus short term. And then also, is it only good for me or is it good for the whole? I think these are very interesting perspectives. Like for example, long term versus short term, really, really, I think really changes the way that you make your decisions, right? Because if you’re playing the long game,

and by long game I mean a game that’s longer than just one lifespan basically infinite number of lifespans you’re really not gonna be so concerned with short-term gain and you’re gonna be for example willing to even give your physical life for a principle that’s gonna be a deal you’re gonna be willing to take because you’re gonna value your what people call your soul or your karma or something long-term something that

that is there, that transcends one lifespan, you’re gonna value that more than some immediate gain. And I think that is really important. For me, that’s been a very important distinction in my life, you know? And I’m really training myself to think in this long-term way. What’s good for me, you know, even if it’s really gonna be unpleasant immediately,

what’s the right thing to do rather than what’s the more pleasant, convenient way to do it in the short term. Because I believe there is a certain kind of dichotomy between short-term gain or I would even call it short-term pleasure or satisfaction and then long-term pleasure and satisfaction.

And it’s almost like you gotta choose one or the other. That seems to be the way that reality works metaphysically. Usually if you do the right thing, there’s gonna be a short term pain associated with that. Even if it’s just something as simple as addiction. If you’re addicted to something, it can be very difficult not to pursue that addiction in the short term.

Ivor (42:49.282)
But then of course in the long term, that’s gonna lead to a higher level of pleasure to be free of addiction. Or to tell the truth. Oftentimes it’s not very pleasant short term, right? To really follow what you believe, even in the spiritual world, right? To go to a meditation teacher and tell him, look, I think what you’re teaching is a little bit limited and I don’t really wanna do it like that. You know? Can be quite unpleasant. He’s gonna kick you out of the retreat.

But if you really do what you feel is right, and I was in that kind of a situation, and sometimes I didn’t do the right thing. And I was like, you know what? I want to stay here for 10 days. But I think that’s really important. And I would say, the skillful approach is always, I would say, the long-term approach.

Like we should really prioritize the long term.

Josh Dippold (43:47.581)
Totally, I totally agree. I don’t think it necessarily always has to be, you know, it is obviously there’s something that’s pleasant and helpful, right? We all want that. There’s no disagreement with that. Then there’s something that’s not pleasant, but it’s helpful, you know? And then there’s something that’s unpleasant and unhelpful. Nobody wants that. But then there’s something that’s pleasant, but it’s not helpful. And that’s a lot of the world, right? Now, I love this dynamic you throw in short term versus long term.

Ivor (44:05.451)
unpleasant.

Josh Dippold (44:17.604)
say, yeah, a lot of my experience aligns that. I wouldn’t say all the time though. mean, just maybe in Dhamma, there can be something short-term that’s pleasant, and it also helps and beneficial, but it also can add up and cumulate.

something that’s helpful long term, would say a daily sitting meditation, right? Not every day is a daily sitting meditation going to be pleasant and beneficial, but a lot of times it is and the you know, it’s it’s towards that long term thing, but it’s It’s every day day by day, right? It has a cumulative effect, you know, so we don’t want to write off something

As you know, it’s not important. It’s short-term. I don’t need to do it because it does have a cumulative effect. But yeah, totally in agreement that these long-term things outweigh because the classic thing in Buddhism is would you let go of a shorter pleasure or a minor pleasure in order to have a long-term long game?

welfare and happiness. yeah, you know, people that are wise, they will forego the quick fixes usually for the long-term welfare and happiness, right? Yeah, so these are really good points here.

Ivor (45:41.635)
Yeah, and then another thing you touched was is it good for me versus is it good for the whole? I think that’s another fascinating subject. And my exploration really has been that in the end, again looking long term, what’s good for the whole is basically always going to be good for me. And what’s good for the small me

is the kind of thing, especially when it’s at the expense of the whole, that’s going to be the kind of short-term pleasure that I want to avoid. And I would say it’s basically a function of wisdom. When you truly see how reality is formed,

or how the patterns of cause and effect operate and you know it well enough so that you can kind of anticipate what kind of effect you will get from a certain action then you tend to not be selfish at all or I would say it like this you see that the most selfish thing that you can do

is to not be selfish at all. it’s kind of like the dichotomy gets lost, because the most selfish thing you can do for yourself, for your own higher benefit, is to really maximize the benefit of the other.

Josh Dippold (47:17.011)
It’s a good way to put it. I heard someone say, you know, if I want something for myself, I should want it for everyone, you know

So what could you give me an example? The first thing you said, did you say something like if it’s good for the whole, it’s good for me. Now, you don’t mean like if 51 percent if it benefits 51 percent, then everybody then I benefit from it and everybody else. I say because that’s that’s that’s the fallacy of democracy, right? Because if you just have 51 percent, well, they’re in charge. But the other 49 percent, they get the short end of the stick. You don’t you don’t mean it like that.

Ivor (47:41.73)
No, no, no, not like that. Right, right.

Ivor (47:54.08)
No, just, no, no, no, not at all. I’m just talking about my inner processes. How do I make a decision? Because I think that’s eventually what life is all about, what reality is all about, right? From the first person. Reality is all about making decisions and we make like hundreds or maybe thousands of decisions every day. And then how do we make them, right? To me, that’s the whole game. And so, very often, you have, let’s say you have decision A and decision B,

Decision a is what seems to be good for you, but it’s not maybe and I’m simplifying But you know just to make a point what seems to be good for you, but not good for the rest That’s what I mean the whole I mean Coming from a model where there’s me and then there’s the rest right like a Kind of like a dualistic model right there’s me and then there’s the there’s the not me right so the not me I call the whole the other right

Josh Dippold (48:51.729)
Yes.

Ivor (48:51.915)
And so what I would say in my experience so far, what I’ve seen by observing the patterns and how the causes and the effects, there seems to be a metaphysical rule that always operates as far as I can see, that when I prioritize the interest of the whole,

That’s when I get a good result. And by the way, the whole, of course it includes me, it doesn’t mean that now I’m gonna cut out my liver and give it to someone else. I’m not talking about that. It’s not like I’m gonna sacrifice myself. It’s more about what’s good for everyone, which includes me, right? Rather than just what’s good for me. And I think this is when you follow this path of exploration.

What I’ve seen is that in the long term, it always ends up, you know, the decision that’s good for the whole, for the other, is actually also the best decision for myself, long term.

Josh Dippold (50:06.483)
It’s a good way to put it. My fiance puts it. What would the world look like if everybody was doing what I was doing? You know what I mean? Because it kind of puts some of our choices then in perspective. I would just say we’re very fortunate to have some extra access to decision making because it seems like most of the world is just…

running, operating on habit patterns, And including myself a lot of times, just automatic pilot based on habit patterns. And that’s where a lot of the decisions come from. But the more, I think, mindfulness awareness we get, we realize there’s way more choices than just what we’ve been told, what we’ve been conditioned, what our habits are in making decisions too. I would say, a caveat in here, that not everything

is subject to kamma, right? There are certain other nyamas, I think they call them, like the weather patterns, even though it does some things, I guess, tie in, but different laws of the mind. What are some of the other things?

But yeah, we’re talking about cause and effect with intentionality. And so intentionality is the huge thing behind cause and effect, right? Because if we’re just doing something, yeah, the cause and effect might apply. But it’s when we do something with intention, when we say something with intention, even if we think something with an intention, it is subject to cause and effect.

in a way that if something just happens without intention, in my experience, it doesn’t seem to be as subject to cause and effect as…

Josh Dippold (51:47.844)
Yeah, then so basically one classic example of this is it makes sense is when I walk down the road, right? If I happen to step on an ant, but I don’t have the I don’t first off I don’t know that I did and I don’t have the intention to kill it, you know Then it’s not gonna have the same Effect and blowback and consequences if I go outside deliberately to seek out an ant with the intention of killing it Because of whatever reason or lack of reason, you know, so this is a key to

Ivor (51:49.474)
Basically.

Josh Dippold (52:17.557)
distinction I feel when it comes to this as well. Yes.

Ivor (52:21.539)
Absolutely, yeah, absolutely. I mean look, in this example, and it’s not just about stepping on an ant, you know, you can, I would call this carelessness and not necessarily with the ant. You know, but sometimes people are emotionally careless, it’s like I didn’t know that that would hurt you. Sure, that’s much better than knowing that that would hurt somebody, but it still is carelessness and I would say there still will be some kind of karmic repercussion.

I like this notion of, it was a guy called Tom Campbell, I don’t know if you’re familiar with him, he has this thing called the theory of everything or he calls it my big toe, T-O-E, and one thing that he says, which I think is brilliant, is that the universe is a simu-, or reality is a simulator, it’s optimized for your growth. And I’m totally on board with that.

Josh Dippold (52:49.875)
It’s a good point.

Josh Dippold (52:55.471)
Sounds familiar, yeah.

Ivor (53:18.133)
And I think it will really always give you exactly what’s best for you, again long term, right? So what does that mean growth? I mean that’s another maybe path of exploration. you know, let’s say if you’re being careless, right? Well I didn’t know. Okay, what’s the universe going to do? If it’s maximized for your growth, it’s going to make you know, right? And how can it do that? Well, you’re going to be in that position of that other person.

that got hurt by your carelessness.

Josh Dippold (53:52.181)
Now this is a really good point because I don’t know exactly the other points you talked to, but this is where the heart has to come in. Because not only carelessness, the Buddha recommended being heedful. Being heedful is the path to the deathless. Being heedless is this if you’re dead or ready. So this is a really high priority that needs to be paid attention. Be heedful. Also, if that happens, then

then for me I would say, I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to hurt you. I wanna do better now. Help me understand how that affected you so that I don’t do it again because I have this commitment to non-harming. And this is the core of all ethical things I feel is non-harming. So if we’re really committed, then the heart will leap up and say, I’m so sorry, didn’t understand. Help me, help.

show me a different way because I don’t want to harm you or anyone else. It’s due to my ignorance and my lack of heedfulness. And so I want to make a resolve to not do that again, you know, and kind of make a commitment to put

forth more efforts to prevent that from arising and happening in the future. So yeah, these are things. Now, the whole simulation thing, this is kind of a popular theory going on. I will say that, of course, we live in a type of situation with our perception. What we perceive is just a really small slice of what’s actually going on. We can only see in a certain bandwidth of a spectrum that’s available.

these, like the visual field, it’s color, light, and form, and we just label it, whatever we label it for convenience, name and form. that’s, we live in a world of concepts. So in a way, living in this world of concepts that we do, because we can’t really, most of us can’t discern ultimate reality, you know, in our daily, day to day lives, moment to moment, although there are some practitioners today who I have faith that they can do.

Josh Dippold (56:01.19)
to really strict teachings and really intense practice. Wisdom and they’re ripe for it too. I guess they’re paramere ripe to do it. However, that’s …

So in a way, we do live in a simulation, meaning that the mind lives in a world of concepts. Now, I love the optimism that you’re putting on it that it’s optimized for our growth. I would say, yes, if we allow it to. I have seen people that are just really interested in oblivion, and that’s it. And the more they choose oblivion and not caring, and apathy, and kind of self-destruction, things like that.

I don’t know if that’s for their most growth, but it’s that opportunity is there for it to be. again, like you say, to choices and choices are real. Yeah, they are so paramount and monumental. even that, like some people would start throwing this free will thing. And I don’t think choices are necessarily free will. You know what I mean? It’s just.

How do we make these decisions? You know, what are they based on? It’s I think it’s a

if we really break down to the minutest point, what really drives every single decision or lack thereof, you know, or choosing not to decide to. So these are really vast, profound things that can be taken in really granular detail and that are, I think, kind of hard to verify too, but we can definitely agree on the importance of our decisions or at least the illusion that we have these decisions and choices in life. Either way, you know,

Ivor (57:30.797)
detail.

Josh Dippold (57:46.935)
So where we will just seem to make the decisions until we can get to the point where we can see through if there is an illusion or not whether or not they are actual decisions made by however they’re being made and yeah, so many per day, but all right, I’ve or I’m gonna let you.

Ivor (57:48.771)
seem to make the decisions until we can get to the point where we can see.

Josh Dippold (58:05.36)
finish this train and we haven’t really even got into, you know, so maybe we’ll have to come back on another time because we wanted to talk about kind of your game theory things, randomness, you know. We did talk a little bit about cause and effect. The mirroring effect, we barely touched on that and we touched a little bit on truth, but I think there’s still more to go there. So I’ll throw it back to you here to…

Ivor (58:31.012)
Yeah, maybe we need a longer session.

Josh Dippold (58:34.244)
We might, we might, yeah. Well, I’ll throw it back to you to start addressing that and then wrapping it up too, leave you with like anyone that’s listening to this, then what would you like to leave with them? Like something that’s important that you feel either now or in the long run, timelessly or whatever you’d like to say.

Ivor (58:55.913)
Yeah, well that’s kind of what my life is about and I would say that’s really what everyone’s life is about even though people may be aware of that to one degree or another but it’s really all about pattern recognition, right? Really figuring out how does this thing work? And first of all, the fundamental question is well, what is this thing in the first place? And we kind of touched on that a little bit.

Yeah, I wish we could go deeper into it. But I think we, you know, we…

Josh Dippold (59:30.932)
Yeah, there’s a possibility we could do another one. mean, reality, that’s exactly what this is all about. Unfortunately, Buddhism has been labeled as a religion, but to me, it’s just this map of what the Buddha found out about reality, and then the best way to go about it, to me, you know, that’s what I think most practitioners should be doing anyway. Yeah, what is this, and what’s the best way to go about it?

Ivor (59:52.737)
Exactly. And then I would just say trial and error, you know, like see what works see what doesn’t work Try this try that That’s certainly been my approach and I’m happy with it, you know And sometimes you have a really bad beat but but it’s worth it because that’s how you get the wisdom, right? You really mess up and You know, you’re not gonna do that again, right? And so to me that’s that’s the advantage of not being dogmatic

and not being too constricted within any kind of set of rules, although there’s benefits to that for sure, but ultimately, the best rules are the ones that you know deep inside of you, you don’t wanna break. And you touched a little bit, we talked a little bit about carelessness and that, and I wanted to go into like a really good personal experience, personal example of that. Like I didn’t mean to,

Josh Dippold (01:00:48.468)
Sure, go ahead, yeah. No, no, go, Sure, no, we have plenty of time for that.

Ivor (01:00:49.736)
Well, just very briefly, you know, in my earlier days, like I can now say I was quite careless, for example, in my relationships, in my romantic relationships. And at the time I had no idea. I honestly never wanted to harm anybody. And I wouldn’t, I didn’t even think about myself as being careless. It’s just because I was just not sensitive enough to feel the pain of the other.

And so now from the perspective of what we’re talking about, you know, I would say the universe, reality, had no other way of showing me that, but to put me into a reverse position where I got to experience all of that pain and suffering. Where it was literally reverse. And only after that, first of all, I realized what I had done. And then after that,

Like you know that experience for example was so deep or serious of those experiences That there’s just no way I can do that again right not because because I believe something It’s just I know it’s so deeply organically. I’m not gonna go there again. You know and I think that that’s just an example Just for really how the universe works in many other ways right in basically in every way I would say you need to go through a certain kind of pattern

until you really kind of master it, right? And usually that has to do with a lot of pain, in my experience.

Josh Dippold (01:02:25.909)
It happens and this is not a reward and punishment system.

This is a cause and effect system, right? And like the thing you said, you learn from the experience and we see we don’t want to go down that road again because we know from experience where that leads to and we now have a choice. It doesn’t really matter so much what’s happened in the past. If we learn from it, that’s what we need to do. That’s it. But right now we have a choice. We have a chance to make something, do something different in our actions, in our speech, in our thoughts matter. So it’s not to get drugged.

Ivor (01:02:31.918)
Right.

Josh Dippold (01:03:00.585)
down by what’s happened in the past. It’s to learn from it and realize now is the chance we have to make a difference. So I just want to add that in there. Yeah.

Ivor (01:03:10.276)
Yeah, and maybe the last thing I want to say, another concept that I think is crucial is just what I call radical responsibility. Like really, really accepting complete and total responsibility for every aspect in one’s life. Which is not always easy to do, right? Because it comes so naturally or maybe we’re so conditioned.

to blame it either on something else, somebody else, or to call it kind of random, nothing to do with me, and I think that’s never really true. I mean, maybe that’s an extreme statement, but I believe in it. Okay, sometimes it may not be completely obvious. In fact, usually it’s not completely and totally obvious. But that would be an example of what I would call faith. Like in every situation I have faith,

that one way or the other I’ve created that situation with my actions, with my thoughts, with my beliefs, with my attitudes even though I may not quite see it I do have faith based but this faith is based on previous experiences and previous patterns I have faith, yeah, I’m creating this, right? So then the question becomes how did I create this?

And then to me that kind of changes the whole dynamic of how I then approach this situation. And I would say if that’s the only thing, if that’s one thing that we can do more, we’re going to live in a completely different reality, Accepting responsibility for our lives and for our situation.

Josh Dippold (01:04:52.007)
And it’s empowering too, right? Because the more responsibility we take, the more empowerment that comes along with it. And I would just add, the way I’m approaching this now is it’s not so important, at least right now, for me to know where it came from, how it caused it, if it’s me or someone else. The matter of the fact is it’s happening. It’s happening to me, or I’m in it. Whatever’s going on in my experience, I now have to take responsibility for that.

You know, it doesn’t really, it’s beside the point whether I’m a some kind of victim of circumstance or whether I perpetuated it, you know, or I don’t know where it’s come and I’m confused about it. You know, yes, ideally, the wisdom would be there to know immediately all that stuff. But a lot of times it’s not. But the priority is, okay, here it is.

I have to take responsibility for it. I don’t, there’s probably going to be even more damage and recklessness come and fall out. So put them in big boy pants. This is happening.

I have to take responsibility for it because that’s how this victim victimizer cycle ends too. Nobody wants to take responsibility. And that’s how it ends. To do something different than perpetuating a cycle over and over. Say, OK, yes, it might be unpleasant, but now I take responsibility for this and do something different. And I don’t really see where needs to be. Any blame needs to be leveled either to me or anyone else. It’s just.

Ivor (01:06:08.92)
Yes, it might be.

Josh Dippold (01:06:21.077)
what’s happening and then either responsibility or lack of responsibility and then wise action. Yeah. And then how am I holding this in my heart and what am I going to do with it or not do with it? So yeah, that’s a really important reminder. I can’t really emphasize that enough. So thanks for that too. Well, I’ve, yeah.

Ivor (01:06:39.652)
Yeah, and I would say it’s not really about blame, it’s more about seeing the actual cause, right? And asking yourself, okay, I don’t like this situation, how can I make it better next time, right? Rather than abdicating responsibility and by abdicating responsibility you abdicate power.

Josh Dippold (01:06:45.395)
Yes.

Josh Dippold (01:06:49.951)
Yes.

Josh Dippold (01:06:57.951)
Really good points, yep. All right. Well, cool, Ivan. This has been a pleasure for me and Joy, and I really appreciate this feedback and spiritual friends in the past. So it’s really good catching up with you again. yeah, hopefully we can do this again down the road. yeah, my pleasure. All right. May all beings everywhere realize awakening and be free. Bye.

Ivor (01:07:14.116)
Yeah, it’s been great. Thank you very much, Josh.

Roots of Religion, Genetics, Hybridization, ETs And Drones With Neil Gaur

(Ai assisted:) In this conversation, Neil Gaur shares his profound journey exploring the roots of religion, spirituality, and the connections between humanity and extraterrestrial beings. He discusses his upbringing in a Hindu family, his quest for understanding the similarities between different religions, and how ancient texts like the Sumerian scriptures have influenced his worldview. Neil emphasizes the importance of genetics in spiritual evolution and the ongoing hybridization programs involving various extraterrestrial races. He also reflects on the impact of nuclear testing on extraterrestrial interest in Earth and the significance of love in spiritual awakening.

We explore the complex themes of hybridization, the ethics surrounding extraterrestrial interactions, and the implications of government secrecy regarding these phenomena. Neil mentions the urge to create inherent in sentient beings, the potential for hybridization to be both beneficial and harmful, and the challenges of discerning truth in a world filled with misinformation. The conversation also touches on the nature of consciousness, reincarnation, and the evolving understanding of UFOs and drones in relation to government operations.

https://portaltoascension.org

https://neilarcturus.com

https://www.instagram.com/portaltoascension

https://www.facebook.com/PortalToAscension

https://www.youtube.com/@PortalToAscension

Takeaways:

  • Neil’s journey began with a quest for the root of all religions.
  • He highlights the similarities between Hinduism and Christianity.
  • Neil’s exploration led him to ancient texts like the Sumerian Tablets.
  • He believes Earth is a library of DNA from various extraterrestrial beings.
  • Neil discusses the impact of nuclear testing on extraterrestrial interest in Earth.
  • He emphasizes the importance of love in spiritual awakening.
  • Neil’s group, Portal to Ascension, was born from a significant realization.
  • He connects genetics to spiritual evolution and extraterrestrial influence.
  • Neil explains the shift in genetic laws post-World War II.
  • He discusses the ongoing hybridization programs involving various extraterrestrial races. The urge to create is a fundamental aspect of sentience.
  • Hybridization has been a continuous process throughout history.
  • Ethical considerations arise when discussing the implications of hybridization.
  • Many individuals are unaware of their experiences with hybridization.
  • Government secrecy complicates the understanding of hybridization agendas.
  • The complexity of alien interactions raises questions about their intentions.
  • Drones and UFO sightings may be linked to government operations.
  • The need for discernment in understanding truth is crucial.
  • The conversation around consciousness is evolving and expanding.
  • Exploring these themes is essential for personal and collective awakening.

Chapters

00:00 Neil Gaur’s Journey into Spirituality and Religion
06:56 Exploring Extraterrestrial Connections and Ancient Texts
14:12 The Role of Genetics in Spiritual Evolution
24:04 Hybridization Programs and Their Implications
27:15 The Urge to Create: Sentience and Hybridization
30:13 The Ethics of Hybridization and Reincarnation
33:27 Government Secrecy and the Hybridization Agenda
36:55 The Complexity of Alien Interactions
40:50 Drones, UFOs, and Government Operations
44:42 Conclusion: The Journey of Understanding Consciousness


Audio: Roots of Religion, Genetics, Hybridization, ETs And Drones With Neil Gaur

Continue reading “Roots of Religion, Genetics, Hybridization, ETs And Drones With Neil Gaur”

Balancing Inner Work And Selflessness At A Monastery (As A Lay Resident)

In this somewhat reflective episode, I share insights from living as a lay resident in a Buddhist monastery in England, focusing on the delicate balance between inward practice and selfless service.

Key topics include:

  • The challenge of maintaining personal spiritual practice while fulfilling communal responsibilities.
  • The emotional complexities around selfishness, guilt, judgment, and communication.
  • Cultural contrasts between England and America regarding service, structure, and flexibility.
  • The importance of healthy boundaries to avoid burnout and support long-term effectiveness.
  • Navigating shame, guilt, and intention when offering help or prioritizing personal time.
  • How the heart — rooted in goodwill and wisdom — can guide discernment in balancing self-care with community care.

Themes:

  • Mindful service vs. spiritual retreat
  • Emotional honesty and communication
  • Cultural dynamics of helpfulness
  • Personal well-being in community life

Audio: Balancing Inner Work And Selflessness At A Monastery (As A Lay Resident)

Or listen via Insight Timer (app or website)


(Mostly) Unedited transcript via https://restream.io/tools/transcribe-audio-to-text

Hey everyone. This is a note on a subject about monastic life here in England, in the Buddhist tradition. And, of course, I can only speak as a lay resident and not much experience. And this notion of balancing going inward and doing practice, Opanayiko, leading inward, and balancing that with selflessness, let’s just say, in a positive light. I want to focus on balancing the positive and negative aspects of this too because kinda constantly balancing of this being supportive to inward practice, but also not being selfish and neglecting duties and responsibilities and opportunities to serve.

So there’s quite a bit to be said, but I’ll try to condense this into the main sticking points. I think the positive aspect needs to be balancing it as well. Because when I think selfishness, I immediately feel, oh, I’m being accused of something or I’m accusing someone else of being selfish. Where does that lead? What problems does that lead to?

And then I’m not good enough. I should be more selfless. Keeping quiet, though, when I want to accuse someone else of selfishness, but then I feel judgmental for doing so. So how do we deal with all these things? There might be everybody might be thinking the same thing, but nobody wants to say go up to someone and say, hey, you’re being selfish. Right? And so sometimes that gets bottled up inside, and it doesn’t really feel good or as helpful for people to suppress what they really feel. And and sometimes it goes talking about people behind them their back. You know?

We talk about it in generalities like this and other things, but still that’s not as direct and specific as sometimes maybe it needs to be, but sometimes it doesn’t. So it’s a very can be a complex issue. I don’t wanna overthink it. I’m just saying it’s not as simple on the surface, and there’s a lot of emotions tied up in things like this too. So what are the alternatives or and I know there’s cultural differences too.

Even just in England, in America, as similar as the cultures are, To me, maybe it’s a miss gross over generalization, but here in England, it seems like there’s a more of a servitude and a following orders and following protocol, doing things properly. And helpfulness is only there if it’s allowed and prescribed and socially kind of acceptable and approved. I do feel in America, there seems to be, at least for some, more helpfulness, a more willingness to be helpful. Now sometimes it’s a good thing, sometimes it’s bad. Just like in England, when it when it’s really good system in place, everybody follows their own things, follows protocol, routes everything the way it should be, then it’s like a well oiled machine.

Everybody knows their place and does their thing, and it works really well. And everybody’s happy, and it just hums right along, and it’s great. It’s just when these oddball things and things out of the ordinary that are bound to happen, that nobody knows what to do with, constantly referring other people to do it. It’s not their job. This is not how we do it, you know, and enforcing things that maybe don’t need to be enforced, then it it kinda falls apart.

Well, in America, that’s where the helpfulness shines, and it comes kinda from the heart and a willingness to do whatever I can to our mutual support. However, when that becomes the overriding rule, then a good system in place can then not really work because, you know, either people are trying to do themselves or some might think, oh, that’s stupid. We should do it this way instead, and there’s bickering and not a consensus. So this lack of cohesion and unity and togetherness and agreement is not there in the same degree as it is in England, I think. So it again, it’s it’s pros and cons.

At least if this holds water, there’s a significant cultural difference that will just allow both cultures to kinda know where they’re coming from and how to adjust, what to do, how to strengthen weaknesses, and and how to capitalize on the strengths. And then there’s this notion of what happens when your personal time is being neglected, people are overserving, and not taking care of their own needs? Well, of course, then they’re not as effective at serving and helping and and going inward. It can be vice versa sometimes too. So how do we balance taking care of our own needs so we can be less selfish and be able to serve more?

And how much are we giving too much emphasis to I’ve gotta have my time and me me time before anybody else, you know. So that’s the notion in guilt. What about the guilt that goes along with it? In shame too? Can it be a healthy shame and a healthy guilt?

Or is it an unhealthy, unuseful shame and guilt? And then, of course, how we’re serving and how we’re holding this balance. Are we using it to kind of control people and get what we want? Or is it for mutual welfare and happiness of all involved? So this is where I feel a lot of this is on a case by case basis.

Seems to be kind of a overarching philosophy too. So how do we balance the details and just the general sense of this? And, of course, like so much of this stuff, the heart is the guide. Right? Our heart will guide us in the discernment of knowingness and acting through a heart of goodwill, kindness, helpfulness for ourselves and others, and wisdom will help as well.

So these are just a few brief reflections on going inward, practice, inner work, Opanayiko, leading onward, progressive, not just horizontal, but vertical progression too, I would say. This act of service, helpfulness, selflessness, and balancing these.


Opanayiko (Pali)

Translation:

  • Leading inward
  • Leading onward
  • Worthy of drawing near
  • To be brought inside or applied inwardly