In this forty-fourth installment of the ongoing live series with Wendy Nash, we continue our inquiry into meditation practice both on and off the cushion this time with Spiritual Friendship or Kalyāṇa-mitta basically meaning “friend of moral beauty” or a “companion on the path of goodness.” What qualifies as this? What are pseudopartners? What is our lived experience with this? Why is this important? How does this relate to meditation?
[Episode note: Even though Wendy has expressed past challenges in UK I’ve found my time there overall of great fruit and great benefit inside and outside the Dhamma and I stay in touch with numerous friends and acquaintances with zero enemies]
Related suttas:
The 7 Qualities of a Good Friend (AN 7.36)
According to the Mitta Sutta, a friend worth associating with is someone who:
Gives what is hard to give (generosity of time, energy, or resources).
Does what is hard to do (helps you out even when it’s highly inconvenient).
Endures what is hard to endure (bears with your bad moods, flaws, or difficult moments).
Reveals their secrets to you (they trust you with their vulnerability).
Keeps your secrets (your private struggles are entirely safe with them).
Doesn’t abandon you in times of trouble (they stick around when life gets messy).
Doesn’t look down on you when you’re down and out (they don’t judge or scorn you when you fail or lose your status).
Ven. Ananda said to the Blessed One, “This is half of the holy life, lord: admirable friendship, admirable companionship, admirable camaraderie “Don’t say that, Ananda. Don’t say that. Admirable friendship, admirable companionship, admirable camaraderie is actually the whole of the holy life…https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn45/sn45.002.than.html
The “Warm-Hearted Friend” in the Sigalovada Sutta (DN 31)
“Householder’s son, you should recognize these four good-hearted friends: the helper, the friend in good times and bad, the counselor, and the one who’s sympathetic.
You can recognize a good-hearted friend who’s a helper on four grounds. They guard you when you’re negligent. They guard your property when you’re negligent. They keep you safe in times of danger. When something needs doing, they provide you with twice the money you need. You can recognize a good-hearted friend who’s a helper on these four grounds.
You can recognize a good-hearted friend who’s the same in good times and bad on four grounds. They tell you secrets. They keep your secrets. They don’t abandon you in times of trouble. They’d even give their life for your welfare. You can recognize a good-hearted friend who’s the same in good times and bad on these four grounds.
You can recognize a good-hearted friend who’s a counselor on four grounds. They keep you from doing bad. They support you in doing good. They teach you what you do not know. They explain the path to heaven. You can recognize a good-hearted friend who’s a counselor on these four grounds.
You can recognize a good-hearted friend who’s sympathetic on four grounds. They don’t delight in your misfortune. They delight in your good fortune. They keep others from criticizing you. They encourage praise of you. You can recognize a good-hearted friend who’s sympathetic on these four grounds.”
The Buddha spoke this matter. Then the Holy One, the Teacher, went on to say:
“A friend who’s a helper, one the same in both pleasure and pain, a friend of good counsel, and one of sympathy;
an astute person understands these four friends for what they are and carefully looks after them, like a mother the child at her breast.
The astute and virtuous shine like a burning flame. They pick up riches as bees roaming round pick up pollen.
And their riches proceed to grow, like a termite mound piling up. In gathering wealth like this, a householder does enough for their family.
And they’d hold on to friends by dividing their wealth in four. One portion is to enjoy. Two parts invest in work. And the fourth should be kept for times of trouble.”
*There’s naturally an ongoing open call for meditation (related) questions for the (roughly) monthly “Meditation Q & A” either by the various social media means listed; integratingpresence[at]protonmail.com or just showing to type/ask live.*
Background
Regular, current and past visitors to Integrating Presence may recall the monthly series “Ask Us Anything” I did with Denny K Miu from August 2020 until January 2022 — partially including and continuing on with Lydia Grace as co-host for awhile until March 2022.
For a fewmonthsthereafter I did various Insight Timer live events exploring potential new directions and/or a continuation of the Ask Us Anything format while weaving in other related teachings to these events.
Then, after chats with meditation coach Wendy Nash, it became clear to start a new collaboration similar to “Ask Us Anything” simply and clearly called “Meditation Q & A” especially due to the original intent of the Ask Us Anything’s being “discussions about meditation and related topics.”
Audio: Spiritual Friendship | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #44
Transcript via YouTube(with timestamps removed and cleanups here and there too I suppose via ai or as ai puts it: “the cleaned-up transcript with minor typos, clear misspellings, and obvious miscontextualizations corrected while preserving the original wording and flow”):
Josh: Hey, wholeness. Welcome. This is Josh, Integrating Presence, and joined once again by the intrepid Wendy Nash. Wendy, what’s happening?
Wendy: I’m here on Kabi Kabi country in Queensland, in Caboolture. It’s quite cold. Straight after this, I have to dash out, so I’m a little bit flimsy, but I’m hoping I’m going to keep warm enough [laughter] during our discussion.
Josh: We’ll make it hot and exciting. [laughter] Well, we’ll see. But so tell me about the weather in Australia in the winter. It’s not that cold there for that long, is it? But when it is, nobody’s really prepared for it, and it comes as a shock all the time, or no? How does it work?
Wendy: So Australia is a really big place, so people misunderstand how huge it is. Just to give you a bit of an idea, it’s the same size as the US mainland. If you take off Alaska, then that’s basically the same size as Australia. So to say, “What’s the weather in Australia?” is like saying, “What’s the weather like in the US?” It just depends on where you are.
Where I am is kind of maybe like Miami, where it’s very humid. It’s about maybe 2,000 kilometers south of the Tropic of Capricorn. And so actually the range of temperatures is not particularly variable here. We’re just outside Brisbane [snorts], but it is very humid.
So when it’s really—there’s something called the wet bulb effect, which is that once the relative humidity gets up to like 95 or 100%, you actually can’t perspire anymore. And then if the temperature gets to 35 degrees Celsius, which I don’t know what that is in hot [laughter]—then you actually can’t perspire, and this is sort of an increasing health problem, particularly with all the heat. So you’ll have seen, obviously in Europe and North America, all these heatwaves. So that’s what happens. Even if you’re in front of a fan, it doesn’t make any difference. Trust me, I know because [laughter] I’ve tried it.
Josh: You’ve tried it. What’s it called? A wet bulb effect? Bulb, B-U-L-B. Wet light bulb? Light bulb?
Wendy: Wet bulb effect.
Josh: Okay. Interesting. I haven’t heard of that.
Wendy: Okay.
Josh: Hey, so yeah. Well, [sighs and gasps] it’s hot a lot of places, but at least you have some coldness there, right? Or some coolness now. So, that’s nice, [gasps] I guess. But anyway, okay, we’ll jump right in here, right? It’s time to start. I’ll just read my little blurb here.
In this 44th installment of the ongoing life series with Wendy Nash, we continue our inquiry into meditation practice both on and off the cushion. This time with spiritual friendship, or kalyāṇa-mittatā—it’s a Pali word for what’s translated as spiritual friendship, basically meaning a friend of moral beauty or a companion on the path of goodness. What qualifies as this? What are pseudo-partners? What is our lived experience with this? Why is this important? How does this relate to meditation? This and more live. So join us if you’re not already here, somehow get here and listen, or listen on the replay, which you may be doing, too.
So yeah, spiritual friendship, and this struck me as particularly important because I just came off of two retreats, and everybody [clears throat] should do more retreats. I love retreats and highly suggest them a lot. And at the same time, when we’re doing silent meditation retreats, it does limit our ability to connect as spiritual friends, which—we need this time alone, but then I think we also need this dynamic of spiritual friendship. What say you, Wendy?
You’re not saying anything. You’re on silent retreat.
Wendy: No, I’m not. I was just going, “Can I quickly get this email out?” [laughter] which I need to send.
Josh: Oh, please go ahead. I could talk forever. Go for it. No, seriously. Talk about spiritual friendship.
Wendy: So this is bad behavior on my part, but I’m like madly trying to dash and get this thing out…
Josh: And we can wrap up [laughter] early today, too. You’ve got extra busy stuff, and it’s not like we’re on the clock getting paid or anything. So yeah, there’s no seriousness here that if we don’t need to be, you know what I mean? Like, you’re more than welcome to—you could turn off your camera and I could just talk and you can listen. But seriously, yeah.
Wendy: But no, let’s not do that. So what is a good friend? You know, like a kalyāṇa-mitta. What is that? Huh, [clears throat] I’ve got some guidelines here.
Josh: I’m sure you do.
Wendy: I think it takes many forms. I was at a community building workshop yesterday and it was talking about social capital, and there’s two types of social capital. One is bonding social capital and one is linking social capital. Bonding social capital is the benefit that you gain from being with your friends, with being with people who are alike. The other one is making connections with people you are not like, but still feeling some sort of connection. You wouldn’t maybe have a big discussion with them because it might go really badly [gasps], but nonetheless, you sort of ride your bike or walk or wherever, and you see them and you go, “Hi,” or whatever.
So for good well-being, you need both. You can be poor, you can have any other stuff [clears throat] going on in your life, but if you actually don’t have those two aspects of social capital in your life, you actually don’t have good well-being. This is what he was saying. And you look around at the world today and you go, “Yeah, that’s it.”
So linking back to what is a kalyāṇa-mitta, I think it is both of those. In a way, with the bonding social capital, I think we do need people who support us in our practice. We do need people to have chats with about the dharma, about meditation, to know if we’re on the right track, how we’re going, and just to feel connected to somebody else in this space. And I think also we need to be able to practice with people who are really different, because that’s where the edge is—people who are really different. So that’s what I would say about a kalyāṇa-mitta: one is a place to practice, and one is a place to chat. What do you think?
Due to the size of this chapter this is part 2 of the eleventh chapter “Happiness” (starting with subchapter 11.9 “Happiness and Ethics” to the end of Chapter 11) from the book:
Buddhadhamma: The Laws Of Nature And Their Benefits To Life by Bhikkhu P. A. Payutto (Somdet Phra Buddhaghosacariya)
Brief note: I’m on for almost back to back retreats at IMS and Dhammasukha in July which will likely see little to no internet interactions until near end of July for another Meditation Q & A and to start editing a cohosted swapcast with a monastic guest recorded yesterday.
Playlist of Ajhan Punnadhammo 31 Realms retreat talk and guided meditations
And during the Questions and Answers (which don’t seem to be published as of July 25, 2026) at the end of the talks for the 31 Realms Retreat with Ajahn Punnadhammo I mentioned only few things that the Ajahn wasn’t familiar with and I couldn’t remember where I had heard them. Here are those references via Ai, one a Mahayana recount on spontaneous rebirth out of a hell realm and the other on the Buddha suggesting knowing the 27 lunar mansions or star clusters along the moon’s path across the night sky for survival purposes for wilderness dwelling monks:
You are thinking of a famous Buddhist narrative often recounted in Mahāyāna texts (such as the Sūtra on Repaying the Kindness of the Buddha or the Sūtra of the Wise and the Foolish) about the first time the Buddha awakened the Bodhi-mind (Bodhicitta)—the altruistic mind of enlightenment.
It is also frequently retold by modern Buddhist teachers, such as Thich Nhat Hanh and Lama Zopa Rinpoche.
The Story: Pushing the Fiery Cart in Hell
In a distant past life, long before achieving Buddhahood, the future Shakyamuni Buddha committed negative karma that caused him to be born in one of the hot hell realms (Naraka).
The Suffering: In this hell realm, he and another hell-being were forced by an ox-headed or lion-faced hell guardian to pull an impossibly heavy, flaming iron cart/chariot across scorching ground. The guards relentlessly whipped and stabbed them with iron forks whenever they slowed down.
The Act of Compassion: The future Buddha saw that his companion was physically collapsing, utterly exhausted, and screaming in agony as the guard brutally beat him. Seeing another’s intense suffering, a profound, spontaneous feeling of compassion arose in the future Buddha.
The Sacrifice: He stepped forward and said to the hell guard: “This person is too weak and pitiful. Please let him rest. Put his rope on my shoulders, and I will pull the cart for both of us.”
The Immediate Rebirth: The brutal hell guard became infuriated by this act of mercy and struck the future Buddha in the head/neck with his iron trident or mace, killing him on the spot.
Because his final thought at the moment of death was pure, selfless compassion and a desire to take on another’s suffering (a moment of Bodhicitta), his heavy negative karma was instantly purified. He escaped hundreds of kalpas (eons) of hellish punishment and was immediately reborn in a higher realm (often described as a heavenly realm or human realm).
Why the Story is Famous
In Buddhist philosophy, this story illustrates three major points:
The Power of Mind/Intention (Cetanā): Karma is ultimately rooted in intention. Even in the deepest, darkest states of mind or existence (represented by Hell), a single genuine spark of selflessness and love can radically transform one’s karmic trajectory.
The Birth of the Bodhisattva Vow: It marks the mythic origin point where the future Buddha first planted the seed to become a Bodhisattva—a hero dedicated to freeing all beings from suffering.
No Place is Beyond Compassion: As Thich Nhat Hanh often reflected on this story, it shows that no matter how terrible a situation or environment is, the capacity for compassion is never permanently lost.
In the Theravāda tradition, there is a subtle but very important distinction to make:
A future Buddha (Bodhisatta) can be born in a hell realm, and the Theravāda Jātaka commentary explicitly records that the Bodhisatta spent time in hell in past lives. However, once a Bodhisatta receives a formal, irreversible prediction (Niyata-Vyākaraṇa) from a living Buddha, their spiritual development prevents them from ever falling into the deepest, most absolute forms of hell (such as Avīci).
1. Did the Bodhisatta Ever Go to Hell in Theravāda?
Yes. In the Theravāda Jātaka commentaries, the Bodhisatta experienced the lower realms, including hell (Niraya), during his long journey through saṃsāra:
The Temiya Jātaka (Mūgapakkha Jātaka): Prince Temiya (the Bodhisatta) remembers his past life where he served as a king for 20 years and had to pass judicial sentences. Because of the heavy karma of taking lives/punishing criminals as a ruler, he spent 80,000 years in the Ussada Hell (a hell realm) suffering immense torment. This terror of returning to hell was so profound that in his present life as Temiya, he feigned being mute, deaf, and crippled for 16 years just so his father wouldn’t force him to become king.
The Sanjiva Jātaka: The Bodhisatta explicitly references times in his past lives when unskilful actions led to rebirth in lower realms before his spiritual momentum became unshakeable.
2. The Nuance: The “18 Ineligible States” (Abhabbaṭṭhāna)
You might have heard that a Bodhisatta cannot go to hell. This comes from a specific Theravāda rule established in the commentaries (like the Sutta Nipāta commentary and the Buddhavaṃsa commentary).
Once a Bodhisatta reaches the point of Definite Prediction (Niyata Bodhisatta)—when a past Buddha looks into the future and confirms, “You will become a Buddha named Gautama”—he acquires the 18 Ineligible States (Abhabbaṭṭhāna). From that exact moment onward, he can never be born into:
Avīci Hell (or the Inter-Cosmic Hells / Lokantarika): The deepest, uninterrupted hells reserved for the absolute worst acts.
The Formless Realms (Arūpavacara): Being trapped in pure mind-states with no physical form, where you cannot practice the Perfections (pāramīs) or help beings.
The Unconscious Realm (Asaññasatta): Where there is physical body but no consciousness.
Extreme / Severe Impairments: Born permanently blind, deaf, insane, or as an animal smaller than a quail or larger than an elephant.
3. Why Can’t a Fully Confirmed Bodhisatta Fall into Deep Hell?
In Theravāda philosophy, this protection isn’t a magical shield granted by an outside force; it is the natural law of kammic momentum:
Power of the Ten Perfections (Pāramīs): A confirmed Bodhisatta spends eons relentlessly cultivating Generosity (Dāna), Morality (Sīla), Renunciation (Nekkhamma), Wisdom (Paññā), and Energy (Viriya). This vast reservoir of bright, wholesome karma (kusala-kamma) far outweighs his unwholesome karma.
Inability to Commit Heinous Crimes: A confirmed Bodhisatta is incapable of committing the five Ānantarika-kamma (killing a mother, killing a father, killing an Arahant, drawing the blood of a Buddha, or creating a schism in the Sangha). Since he cannot commit these acts, the karmic doorway to Avīci hell is permanently shut.
Efficiency of the Path: A Bodhisattva’s primary “job” is to mature his pāramīs and help other beings. Spending millions of years incapacitated in the absolute worst hell realms would stall the realization of Buddhahood inefficiently. His refined mental state organically protects him from plunging into the deepest darkness.
The reference you are thinking of comes primarily from the Vinaya Pitaka (specifically the Cullavagga, in the section on duties for forest-dwelling monks, Āraññikavatta), along with supporting mentions in the Sutta Pitaka.
Here is how the requirement came about, what the Buddha specifically instructed, and why.
1. The Vinaya Origin Story (Cullavagga)
In the monastic code, the rule was established after a group of forest-dwelling monks encountered bandits in the wilderness:
The Incident: Bandits traveling through the forest approached the monks and asked them for drinking water, fire, the current cardinal directions (disā), and the positions of the lunar constellations/asterisms (nakkhattapadāni). Because the monks lived purely in meditation and lacked basic wilderness skills, they couldn’t answer. The bandits assumed the monks were impostors or thieves themselves and beat them up.
When the Buddha heard about this, he established a set of practical standards (vatta) for any monk living out under the stars or deep in the wilderness:
The Rule:
“A forest-dwelling monk should learn the lunar mansions (nakkhattapadāni uggahetabbāni)—either all of them or in part.”
“He should be skilled in knowing the cardinal directions (disākusalena bhavitabbaṁ).”
He was also required to keep fire-generating sticks, store drinking water, and carry basic survival gear.
2. Why Did Wilderness Monks Need Star Knowledge?
The term used in Pali is nakkhatta (Sanskrit: Nakshatra), which refers to the 27 lunar mansions or star clusters along the moon’s path across the night sky.
The Buddha prescribed this not for astrology or fortune-telling (which monks were strictly forbidden from practicing), but for three purely practical survival and monastic needs:
Navigation & Wayfinding: Knowing how to orient oneself by the stars prevented monks from becoming lost in dense jungle or open wilderness.
Timekeeping & Calendar: Without clocks, watching the moon’s movement through the nakkhattas allowed monks to anticipate the Uposatha (full/new moon observance days) and track seasonal changes.
Assisting Travelers: Forest monks were expected to be helpful guides to lost travelers, foresters, or pilgrims wandering through the wilderness.
3. A Related Sutta Reference: Warding Off Sleepiness
In the Pacalāyana Sutta (Anguttara Nikaya 7.61), Venerable Mahāmoggallāna was meditating in the forest under the open sky and falling asleep. The Buddha appeared to him and offered a sequence of practical techniques to combat drowsiness.
One of those suggestions was to step outside, look up, and survey the night sky:
“If by doing this you don’t shake off your drowsiness, then look up and examine the major stars and constellations…” — AN 7.61
[Note: Wendy’s audio improves significantly after four minutes]
In this forty-third installment of the ongoing live series with Wendy Nash, we continue our inquiry into meditation practice both on and off the cushion this time with the massive topic of non-harm. Our last Q and A on the five ethical training precepts took some interesting turns. This time we look at what those five are mostly based on: non-harming. This is big and basic yet foundational for meditation practice, wisdom and everyday life with massive range for our inner worlds, the outer world and beyond
(Ai more or less puts this talk thus:) Non-harming is explored as the foundational principle underlying Buddhist ethical precepts, meditation practice, and daily life: how harm manifests internally (self-blame, hurt feelings, “spikiness”) and externally (difficult relationships, power dynamics, manipulation, political rhetoric), emphasizing self-responsibility, honest self-reflection, and skillful communication over blame.
Key themes include:
Recognizing when feedback about ourselves has validity vs. when it reveals something about the other person.
Meditation practices for inquiring into hurt (“What needs to be known here?”).
Handling difficult or manipulative people without escalating harm (referencing – Shantideva’s stick analogy and the Dhammapada).
The value of feedback, emotional availability, and non-defensive communication.
Lojong (mind-training) slogans as practical tools for transforming adversity into awakening.
Forgiveness (releasing resentment without condoning harm), self-compassion, and avoiding martyrdom.
Broader observations on power, paranoia, political division, and reciprocal relationships based on integrity.
The tone is personal, reflective, and conversational, blending everyday examples with Buddhist wisdom.
Chapter Titles (with approximate timestamps):
0:00 Intro & Topic Overview – Welcome, context, and introducing non-harming as the root of ethics.
1:25 Hurt, Blame & Self-Reflection – Wendy on feeling hurt, blaming others, and recognizing one’s own “spikiness” in meditation.
5:06 Two Options When Criticized – Learning about ourselves or about the other person; discernment and responsibility.
8:28 Difficult People & Power Dynamics – Viewer question and discussion on threatening personalities, family/professional conflicts, and the “pinball” of mutual hurts.
11:26 Meditation Inquiry Practice – Wendy’s approach: “What needs to be known here?” and working with thoughts/emotions.
14:14 Communication & Feedback – Asking directly, using “I” statements, emotional availability, and more skillful phrasing (“What I hear you care about is…”).
21:50 Manipulation & Losing Respect – Experiences with inauthentic people, complicity in being “played,” and the pain of dishonesty.
25:55 Overcoming Harm with Non-Harm – Dhammapada quote, taking the initial “hit,” avoiding tit-for-tat escalation (Josh).
28:55 Boss Story & Psychopathic Patterns – Realization of one’s own condescension; paranoia as projected shame; power and fear spirals.
33:42 Wisdom Practices & Forgiveness – Seeking guidance from teachers, blanket forgiveness, self-forgiveness, and releasing ill will.
36:30 Grudges, Drama Triangles & Political Harm – Addiction to grudges, victim-victimizer-hero patterns, political rhetoric, and divide-and-conquer dynamics.
45:16 Lojong Slogans – Mind Training – Detailed discussion of key Lojong principles: use everything as the path, drive all blames into one, tonglen, hold views lightly, etc.
55:40 Cautions & Closing Reflections – Avoiding misinterpretations (martyrdom), compassion guiding rules, and final thoughts on non-harming.
Some resources for a few things mentioned:
Mahayana Precepts (Bodhisattva Precepts)
Mahayana traditions often emphasize the Bodhisattva Precepts (from the Brahma Net Sutra), which include the Three Pure Precepts plus sets of major and minor vows focused on benefiting all beings.
Lojong is a Tibetan Mahayana practice with 59 slogans (organized into 7 points) by Atisha and Chekawa Yeshe Dorje. It focuses on transforming adversity into the path of awakening, compassion, and reducing self-centeredness.
*There’s naturally an ongoing open call for meditation (related) questions for the (roughly) monthly “Meditation Q & A” either by the various social media means listed; integratingpresence[at]protonmail.com or just showing to type/ask live.*
Background
Regular, current and past visitors to Integrating Presence may recall the monthly series “Ask Us Anything” I did with Denny K Miu from August 2020 until January 2022 — partially including and continuing on with Lydia Grace as co-host for awhile until March 2022.
For a fewmonthsthereafter I did various Insight Timer live events exploring potential new directions and/or a continuation of the Ask Us Anything format while weaving in other related teachings to these events.
Then, after chats with meditation coach Wendy Nash, it became clear to start a new collaboration similar to “Ask Us Anything” simply and clearly called “Meditation Q & A” especially due to the original intent of the Ask Us Anything’s being “discussions about meditation and related topics.”
Audio: Non-harm | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #43
Full Raw Verbatim Transcript (with timestamps removed via ai):
Hey homelessness, welcome. This is Josh, integrating presence Wendy Nash. What’s going on today?
Well, I’m here on Gubby Gubby country in Queensland in culture. Josh, you’re I think in Colorado at the moment.
No, I’m back from Colorado. Back in Missouri. So, yes, it’s a little confusing. I didn’t change the thing on my website that had mountain time, which is in Colorado. So, I was confused on how long I was going to be there, but back here in Missouri. And so, today
Yeah, today we’ve we’re doing I just might as well just jump right in here.
Um, and it looks like another platform is working at this time. So, I’m just I just started that. So, this is our 43rd installment of our ongoing live series with Wendy Nash here and we we’re going to continue our inquiry into meditation practice both on and off the cushion.
This time with the massive topic of nonharm.
The last Q&A we did was on the uh five ethical training precepts took it took some interesting turns. This time we’ll look at those uh what those five are mostly based on which is nonharming.
This is big and basic yet foundational for meditation practice wisdom and everyday life with a massive range for our inner worlds, the outer world and beyond. So where do we start with this one?
Well, actually, you know how I’ve got this thing at the moment where I’m talking about hurt and ache? Yes. You can hear in my chair.
Oh, no.
Yes. So, this morning I was in my meditation thinking about what because I love um when I’m meditating to think why is it in that situation it doesn’t bother me but in that situation it does.
I like the compare and contrast model because like what is the difference there? And so I think about hurt. Why when do I feel hurt? And I realized this morning because I I kind of get into the blame game. Talk about nonharm. Haha.
Not. So um and what I realized is that I feel hurt. I mean I blame people when I feel hurt. When I feel hurt, it’s because I actually am somehow believing that what they’re saying is true.
I know that’s a bit controversial, but when I feel completely like, well, that has nothing to do with me. They’re just a bit nuts. Then I go, okay. But there is a part of me that realizes that maybe I’m not all squid clean and, you know, all the rest. And I realized that there was a part of me that actually um I was a bit spiky still like I knew I used to be but I it still sits there and I can feel it in some of the way that I’ve interacted with people and and I just got and some comments on Facebook you know you can get there pretty pretty quick and so I was just sorry about mentioning that social media account.
Um, so I was just um reflecting on how the only way to step into that space is well, this is the way that I do it anyway, which is to ask myself in meditation, what needs to be known here? So, I’ve got an identity. I’m hurt. what’s what else is here in the picture?
You know, what am I not seeing about this? And I just went, “Wow, I’m actually quite spiky. Well, you know, I’m not always my best self. What can I say?” But instead of trying to excuse, well, everybody’s not, you know, their best self all the time. I thought, well, I am actually sometimes not my best self. And maybe I agree with them that there is a part of me that doesn’t that sort of deserves to be hurt. Now I’m not being all, you know, you deserve to be treated badly or anything like that. I’m certainly not advocating in that space, but just to recognize that sometimes I can be not my, you know, I’m not being my best self. as well.
Well, that’s this is really I mean this is the nitty-gritty of everyday life.
And before I jump into my response here, um I think we had this last time that it’s it’s just a little bit muddy on the audio, but not too bad. It’s still it’s still um it’s still okay otherwise. Um so sorry to to detract from that, but it’s it’s all good. I will set I will change my u audio settings. I’m just going to go to this venerable’s response that I love surrounding the well first off I will say that that’s my tendency too and see I’m even one of blaming the fact that I’m blaming so that’s my tendency too to go to someone else and say oh it’s on them not me right and then I even want to blame like my my parents or whoever my upbringing and external circumstances for me to be blaming. And so to me, this this speaks to self- responsibility. But the the the way this one venerable put it, um, when someone says something about me, there’s basically two main options. Either we learn something about ourselves and what they’re actually saying has some validity, or we learn about them, what kind of person they are, right? And a lot of times I find what someone says has a lot to do about actually what’s been done to them. And so they’re they’re saying the same thing. But but sometimes it’s totally legitimate and it is about me and it’s a completely valid point. Now you know um then then we come to discernment. That’s why meditation is so in reflection and contemplation is so great because then I can take that in and say okay is there anything to this? like you’re saying from what I remember is basically, you know, like yeah, where is there anything to that? And what do I need to do about it? You know, I was I being a little bit harsh. I like the word spiky. That’s good. You know, like um and yeah, did my words cause harm? And even though I might not have meant that um at least that’s what I tell myself. Was there actually something deeper going on where I wanted to have some kind of harm and I just wasn’t conscious or um maybe I just wasn’t aware of that and I don’t want that to happen. So then I want that feedback if it’s valid and legitimate and helpful to then inform how I go forward because at the root of this like we I mentioned at the beginning harm is kind of the harm and non-harming is the the core of ethical practice. And not to get too political here, but you know, apparently there’s a war going on. And war is big business in America, you know, and there’s all kinds of rhetoric on why it’s okay to harm, how one is in the right to do it, what kind of stories and narratives and imperatives and just, you know, even religious um righteousness because my God said it’s we’re justified in killing, you know, and all manner of craziness. I would just or just ridiculousness about why it’s okay to harm and that’s a radical statement but uh in today’s society but but so be it you know yeah I just going back to your first statement you know venerable who said either it’s about them or it’s about you and I would like to say actually who says it’s binary either or you know these things relationships are dependent arising so there’s nothing to say that both of us aren’t sitting there being hurt and there’s a particular instance, a particular person and M Reed is here on the scene. Hi Josh. Hi Wendy. So good to be here on this topic. Love to have you here. Maybe is there something that you would like to share now? You’re a little bit behind just because of the way the recordings go, but um you’ll catch up quick. Welcome. We put it put your question in now while we’re on this topic and then we’ll come back to you.
But there’s one particular person who I find quite there’s two people in my life. One is in my family and one is in my professional world who are both quite difficult characters and both of them play the power game. Now, I know a lot of powerful people because I deal with politicians and stuff like that, but it’s really interesting when people feel like very quickly threatened by me. Now, I don’t like to think of myself as being threatening, you know, like I’m what 55 kilo woman and I’m 165 cm tall. So I don’t know what that is in the old numbers but um but you know not physically threatening but what I’ve realized is that threat comes in many forms and we have identities about mirror mirror on the wall who’s the somethingest of us all and so I do feel that these two people that I know one is very threatened by the fact that um they want to be the both of them want to be the center of attention actually they want to both of them be the leaders in this space and I’m just doing my thing and I just want to do what I do and I’m happy to collaborate but both of those are solo players and want to be the one who claims the glory they want to be the one who who’s got that But that’s because in their own world they too have wounds and hurts.
But that doesn’t mean to say that when they kind of cut me off or say something mean to me, I don’t say something mean back just in my frustration, in my own hurt.
And so I think it’s like this pinball machine of like bing bing bing bing bing bing bing where you’re ricocheting around your own hurts. So I I often think of Shanti Deva. I don’t know if you’ve read much of Shanti Deva, but I do like this example of the stick, you know, was blaming someone for their bad behavior is like blaming the stick for hitting me, you know, like you can’t. So Emmery says here, “Yeah, I can do harm and not know I do harm. So what is the best approach to this?” Well, so I don’t know if you noticed, but at the beginning, Emmery, I said my approach is when I’m meditating to ask myself, what needs to be known here? Just sort of sit in the middle of this unpleasant feeling because this particular kind of thing where everything gets quite still and I’m going, h, okay, I’m in the zone. What needs to be known here? And I just keep repeating that. And often I’ll put in um things like uh what’s the theme common to all these thoughts or what’s the emotion common to all these thoughts and I find that very helpful. So that’s me.
What about you Josh? What do you say is um what’s the best approach? Well there’s there’s a lot here. Yeah.
Let me let me pick up on uh what you said. Yes. And it’s not as simple as the we either learn something about the other person or we learn something about ourselves. A lot of times that’s particularly helpful if I can’t figure out, oh, is that them or is that me? Is what they’re saying actually about me or what they’re saying is actually shows me where they’re at and what’s been done to them when there’s some kind of confusion or just taking these extra perspectives.
Yeah, it’s not as simple as a binary thing. That’s for sure. I want to ask Wendy before I get to the the question here is did did you ever ask them d I’m curious did you ever ask them directly if if the the people you say that um they they they what was the language you use that they think that you’re um harming them or yeah do did you ever ask them directly or did you just kind of assume that they think that you’re hurtful towards them do you know what I mean or how do you how how did you know how did you find out that how did you come to that assessment.
My apologies for the disjointedness while my internet connection kept dropping and dropping during the live recording
In this forty-second installment of the ongoing live series with Wendy Nash, we continue our inquiry into meditation practice both on and off the cushion intending to turn attention to our ethical foundation of the five precepts: training to refrain from harming; dishonesty/untruthfulness; taking/receiving what’s not given (thieving); sexual (energy) misconduct; and intoxicants while actually ending up more addressing earnestness, hurt, conditioning from upbringing, misunderstandings around attachment, needs in relationships and more.
In our last Q and A Wendy mentioned that “a few years ago, I was really earnest. I’ve always been a bit of a goody-two-shoes type of person. I can get pretty earnest and pretty serious about being good. Like, ‘We’ve got to be good, folks. We can’t just be out having fun — we’ve got to be good.'”
Wendy’s statement kind of raised an eyebrow for me. In this Q and A on the five precepts and ethics we unpack this comment of Wendy’s along with exploring: directly seeing and knowing the purpose and benefits of precepts; “may I” vs. “shoulds” and expectations; excuses / justifications; how belonging, self-deception, and trust / (self-)confidence factor in; exploring (unconscious) distortions around views like: “only this is what’s best (for me)” and/or “this and this needs to happen (first) and (to) be a certain way for me and things to be OK” and of course how all this relates to meditation practice
Confidence is required for the establishment of virtue. Without confidence and trust, one does not firmly resolve to act rightly.
If you cannot trust your own mind to remain upright in moral conduct, then uprightness will never be sustained. If you do not trust yourself to refrain from false speech, your speech will remain crooked. If you do not trust yourself to refrain from taking what is not given, bodily actions will continue to incline in that direction. If one does not establish firm restraint over lust, sexual misconduct will recur again and again. If you keep giving excuses to break precepts, the mind will always justify its own crookedness. If you do not trust in the benefits of the precepts, transgressions will keep recurring.
Moreover, if one continues to deceive oneself—pretending that the precepts are being maintained when they are not—then the cycle of transgression continues without interruption.
One must have confidence in one’s own ability to uphold the precepts; without that trust, their observance will never be firmly established. And if one lacks that confidence, the mind can remain crooked.
*There’s naturally an ongoing open call for meditation (related) questions for the (roughly) monthly “Meditation Q & A” either by the various social media means listed; integratingpresence[at]protonmail.com or just showing to type/ask live.*
Background
Regular, current and past visitors to Integrating Presence may recall the monthly series “Ask Us Anything” I did with Denny K Miu from August 2020 until January 2022 — partially including and continuing on with Lydia Grace as co-host for awhile until March 2022.
For a fewmonthsthereafter I did various Insight Timer live events exploring potential new directions and/or a continuation of the Ask Us Anything format while weaving in other related teachings to these events.
Then, after chats with meditation coach Wendy Nash, it became clear to start a new collaboration similar to “Ask Us Anything” simply and clearly called “Meditation Q & A” especially due to the original intent of the Ask Us Anything’s being “discussions about meditation and related topics.”
Audio: Five Ethical Precepts | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #42
This is Josh of Integrating Presence and today I’m not yet joined by Wendy Nash. I apologize. I had the times a little bit off several times now. So, we originally changed the first time and then the second time I accidentally put a half an hour later. So, I’ll give Wendy a little bit of time. to get here.
She might have been under the impression too that it was a little bit later.
So the this one is called the five ethical precepts.
So I’ll just go ahead and read the description I have here.
In this 42nd installment on the ongoing series live series with Wendy Nash, we continue our inquiry into meditation practice both on and off the cushion. Turning attention to our ethical foundation of the five precepts. training to refrain from harming, dishonesty, untruthfulness, taking receiving what’s not given, thieving, sexual energy, misconduct, and intoxicants. In our last Q&A, Wendy mentioned that a few years ago, I was really earnest. I’ve always been a bit of a goody two shoes type of person. I can get pretty earnest and pretty serious about being good. Like, we’ve got to be good, folks. We can’t just be out having fun. We’ve got to be good.
Wendy’s statement kind of raised an eyebrow for me. In this Q&A on the five precepts and ethics, we plan to unpack this comment of Wendy’s along with exploring directly seeing and knowing the purpose and benefits of precepts. And here’s Wendy.
Hey, you’re on.
We had a time zone difference. So, I’m very sorry about that. Sorry everybody for being a little bit late.
It It’s okay. And like I I just got done saying first we’ve we changed the original time and then I made a mistake in the in the description putting it at 8:30 instead of 8 central European. So no big deal. So I was right in the middle of reading the the intro and I’ll just back up just a little bit and and won’t reread the five precepts. I’m I’m assuming most people are familiar with those, but we we can maybe get into we’ll get into each individual one.
Anyway, so I I said in our last Oh, by the way, u the the standard formalities here. Sorry. Wendy, what’s going on?
And how’s it going where you’re at today? oh, M. Reed is on the call. Woohoo. Great to see you here again.
Likewise. You’re always fantastic to have. It’s something it means so much, isn’t it? when somebody you know regularly joins us now even though we’re late we dis anything kind of well life so it’s always just such a joy to have Emily here with us what’s going on well I I spoke at a parliamentary inquiry yesterday oh wow and so as a witness you know it’s like I don’t know what you call it in maybe the US but you have some legislation and then you write a submission and then you might get called back if the committee decides to be a witness. So I was a witness and so there’s like the left wing and the right wing on the political spectrum and they’re playing tit for tat through me. It was just like oh wow this is really awful. This is very interesting from a dharma perspective.
4 minutes, 1 second How do you navigate that space? How do you remain loving and kind? And you know, I’ve started to really think about how people are really trapped in their minds and this is where we’re going wrong. It’s like, and we’re all trapped in our minds cuz I was like, whoa. And I was, you know, on my way home, I was just going talk to me about happy chickens to my friend. I just need something, please laugh on me.
And yeah, because I needed I needed to feel like human beings were around me. And I just happened to been to a very very senior politician as I walked out of the building. And I thought, I do not like this man. I know a lot of politicians, so they’re not all like that, but it’s just like and it’s hard to to not hate them or really dislike them. and to see them as human. You know, this is the 5 minutes, 1 second dilemma. This is what we’re working with. So, that’s what’s going on for me.
Josh, a bit more of an answer than perhaps you wanted.
It’s it reminds me of that old Ramdas, this the this spiritual guru who’s no longer with us before he died because of all the the president in America. He had a picture of him on his altar because there was so much hate and he said he loved everything, everybody. I mean, that was his path.
It’s a little bit we don’t have time to go into that now, but I I know what you mean with this this polit. It’s almost like some of them feed on that hatred, you know. It’s more to get attention and power. even it doesn’t matter if it’s bad, you know, just to get all those eyeballs and attention and energy on them, you know, and this will fit perfectly into to to ethical precepts too, you know. So, I I think that’s that’s great. And yes and I would just say the the political process is a little bit different in America. No parliament. And it’s interesting how you were so personally involved in this process. Usually in America it’s it’s not like that in the Congress as far as I know. But maybe for another time.
We’ll see. Well, cool. Okay. I’ll jump back into this. in our last Q&A I’m reading here again. In our last Q&A, Wendy mentioned that a few years ago I was really earnest. I’ve always been a bit of a goodie two shoes type of person. I can get pretty earnest and pretty serious about being good. Like, we’ve got to be good, folks.
Oh, he’s gone. Sorry about that, everybody. I don’t know where he’s gone.
I’m hoping he’ll come back. So, have you ever found yourself being earnest? And do you know what the word means? So, by the word earnest, I see it as that I’m I have this really strong need and desire to be good. And so, I just f because Josh is gone. I’m wondering if it’s me who’s gone. So, can anybody say something so that Emry, can you just say something? Here we are.
There we are. Okay. Was it me who went or you who went? Oh, that’s the other thing. I I don’t know. but my connection on this island has been dropping off. If if it happens again just we’ll it will come back. We just have to be patient. It just takes a few seconds to come back on. So Okay, keep going. So keep going.
In this forty-first installment of the ongoing live series with Wendy Nash, we continue our inquiry into meditation practice both on and off the cushion, turning our attention to the question of peace—especially in a time when conflict is close at hand.
Rather than focusing on politics, we explore some of what can be done practically within practice itself: how peace is cultivated and supported in formal meditation, how it carries into everyday life, and where it tends to wane or destabilize.
Areas of exploration include the conditions that give rise to and sustain peace; how it is revealed or obscured in relationship; the difference between brief glimpses and more stable baselines; the role of awareness; and perhaps a little of how some inquiries can clarify or deepen peace.
0:00 Welcome & Setting the Scene 1:18 Wendy’s Day & Small Incremental Actions 3:21 Episode Theme: Practical Peace & Ease 5:27 Joy as a Responsible Practice 8:46 Awakening Factors & Mudita (Sympathetic Joy) 12:00 Working with Hurt vs Physical Pain 17:18 Feeling Hurt in the Body – Dukkha Embodied 23:23 Distinguishing Hurt from Pain 29:06 What Does Peace Really Mean? (UN Definition & Dignity) 36:41 Baselines of Peace & Conflict Avoidance 43:59 Meditation, Unpleasant Sensations & Capacity 48:30 Real Life Example: The Vape Shop Frustration 55:28 Understanding Root Causes – Trauma & Resources 59:38 Closing Reflections & Wishes for Ease 1:01:44 Final Thoughts & Invitation
Other topics include:
Joy as a responsible practice: Wendy talks about overcoming guilt around feeling joyful amid world suffering, emphasizing that joy (including mudita/sympathetic joy) is a wholesome, nourishing quality praised in Buddhist teachings. It serves as a counterbalance to heaviness and compassion fatigue.
Working with hurt and dukkha: A major focus is distinguishing emotional hurt (the relational/heart ache felt in the body) from physical pain. Both speakers share how resistance to feeling hurt leads to contraction in the body, mental proliferation (“he said, she said”), and reactive behavior. Allowing oneself to fully feel the hurt in the body without judgment often causes it to dissipate, creating space for wiser responses.
Peace vs. mere absence of conflict: Drawing from a UN diplomat’s comment, they contrast the Western/Anglosphere view of peace (no conflict) with a broader understanding centered on dignity for all. They explore personal baselines of peace, the role of avoidance or explosive conflict in relationships, and how meditation helps build capacity to stay with unpleasant bodily sensations.
Practical application: Real-life examples are discussed, such as Wendy’s frustration with illegal parking by a vape shop that blocks the footpath, and how anger, railing, or avoidance often fail to help. They reflect on trauma as “unintegrated resources,” the addictive nature of certain coping mechanisms, and the value of restraint, direct but kind communication, and self-inquiry (“how much am I the problem?”).
Cultivating peace and ease: The conversation highlights mindfulness of bodily sensations, working with reactivity, balancing joy and compassion, the importance of community/support, and the Metta Sutta’s wish “may all beings be at ease.” Both acknowledge they are still works in progress and invite listeners to share how they cultivate peace.
*There’s naturally an ongoing open call for meditation (related) questions for the (roughly) monthly “Meditation Q & A” either by the various social media means listed; integratingpresence[at]protonmail.com or just showing to type/ask live.*
Background
Regular, current and past visitors to Integrating Presence may recall the monthly series “Ask Us Anything” I did with Denny K Miu from August 2020 until January 2022 — partially including and continuing on with Lydia Grace as co-host for awhile until March 2022.
For a fewmonthsthereafter I did various Insight Timer live events exploring potential new directions and/or a continuation of the Ask Us Anything format while weaving in other related teachings to these events.
Then, after chats with meditation coach Wendy Nash, it became clear to start a new collaboration similar to “Ask Us Anything” simply and clearly called “Meditation Q & A” especially due to the original intent of the Ask Us Anything’s being “discussions about meditation and related topics.”
Audio: Practical Ease | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #41
Mostly unedited transcript using ai to “clean up” by removing timestamps:
. . . and today I’m joined with Wendy Nash. Wendy, what’s going on?
Well, I’m looking at your not background actual real environment. Now, you have to do a kind of a this is not AI. Just saying folks, this is actually the real McCoy. So, I I’m here. I’m here. I I’m here on my I’m just getting an echo here. Sorry about that. I got the YouTube up. So, I got the video up. Um, so I um I’m here on Gummy Gummy Country in Queensland in Kabula and my background is nothing like as exciting as yours is. That’s kind of amazing.
Now, you’re in Crete at some place where there’s a lighthouse at the back.
Yeah. And I thought and also I guess I don’t know if you can hear this in the background, but military jets. Um, I think there’s an American military base here on Crete and this is in Chania. If you see right behind me here, I’ve got the video louder. And uh, that’s a lighthouse, like an old Venetian lighthouse. That’s kind of the main fixture of the town. But Wendy, I’m going to throw it over to you and mute for a second.
Sure.
Well, Josh, I’m very excited. Apart from anything else, I’ve been having a quite a cool day. It was really inspiring. Then I just went so basically, you know, I have my transport thing. So I looked at what there’s an event called the week without driving in October that happens in the US and I’m bringing it up to here. I’ve done it a couple of times and I looked at all the amazing stuff everyone’s doing and I’m going, “Oh man, I can’t do any of that.” And I felt really down in the dumps. And then I just thought, but what can I do? Like I can’t do all that stuff. I don’t have the social media and I don’t have, you know, there is there is nobody really other than me. I mean, that’s not entirely true, but there are it’s pretty thin on the ground. And then I went, well, what can I do? And I thought, I can do this and I can do that and I can do that. And I thought, okay, that’s pretty cool. Actually, if I just got that, that would be amazing. And we had M Reed 1747 on today. Hi Josh. Hi Wendy. Welcome Emry. And hey, how’s it going?
So, you know, Wendy, that’s a really good point because um a lot of times it seems uh we can get discouraged before we do anything and we think that we can’t do anything, but usually there’s a lot of things we can do and we write it off as insignificant like, oh, that’s not good enough. But again, incremental steps, uh drop by drop, we can fill things up. I mean, yes, it could be frustrating that the progress we don’t have access to enough resources. We we know what we want, but we can’t do it. But we there’s usually something that can be possibly done. I mean said this time and time again and uh that uh support and encouragement and trust that what we do and say does make a difference, you know, especially with the intentionality behind it. So today is also our 40th one of these, you know. So let me read the description we have here. We’re going to call we’re calling this one practical 41st.
Oh, it is. Okay. My bad. You’re right. I need to change that in the description.
Oh wow. So numbers and dates aren’t my time. So I’m we’re calling this practical ease. I was wanting to call it practical peace just because of the alliteration, right? PP, but I think ease is more um relatable. So in this 41st installment of the ongoing live series with Whitney Nash, we continue our inquiry into meditation practice both on and off the cushion, turning our attention to the question of peace, especially in a time when conflict is close at hand. Rather than focusing on politics so much, we’ll explore what can be done practically within practice itself. How peace is cultivated and supported in formal meditation, how it carries into everyday life, and where it tends to wane or destabilize.
Areas of exploration here may include the conditions that give rise to and sustain peace, how it is revealed or obscured in relationship, the difference between brief glimpses and more stable baselines of peace and ease, the role of awareness, and how inquiry itself can clarify or deepen peace. So, kind of a lot of fancy words there and descriptions. Um, but the the the main thing today I think is practicality and we we’re we’re told there’s a war going on. I mean uh war sucks. I I don’t think war is ever okay really my personal opinion. Um but like how how does that what relevance does it have in our lives? And if anything, I think it draws our attention to, okay, how peaceful is my life um and those around me and how much at ease am I and how much the opposite and why is that important and what’s how does that work?
Yeah. So, I’m going to be really I’m going to speak to a bit about that. So, a few years ago, I was really really earnest. I’m a very kind of goody two shoes kind of person. By the way, M Reed says, “I can totally relate, Wendy.” I think that was the up and down thing. And uh it’s always great to have M Reed because she’s so supportive and such a lovely person. And at least I assume it’s a woman, but anyway, we’ll just It is as far as I know it is. Yes, I I know. I’m saying the f Reed’s mi Miz Reed’s first name, but I’m pretty sure I know.
Yeah. So, um, you know, I can get pretty earnest and pretty serious about being good. We’ve got to be good, folks. We can’t be like fun. We’ve got to be good. And I just I read this book called Awakening Joy. I realized I was really boring. And so, I I read this book, Awakening Joy, by Jamie Barers. I’m sure you know him. And it says something like page one or two or certainly in the first chapter, what stops you being feeling joyful right now like in daily life? And I just thought I actually feel really guilty for feeling joyful. You know, there’s so much bad stuff that people experience and war, of course, is one of those things. I mean, they it’s like awful. I have a um an acquaintance in Iran and it’s I just said I’m sending you lots of love through one of the social media or email and she said that just made my day. I was she’s so heartbroken by the situation that she just is going just that one good kind word made her day.
Can you imagine what your life is like when that happens? That’s that’s war. That’s what war does. And um and but I thought I I I thought I I felt really guilty cuz there were all these things. And then I thought when I’m when I’m down in the dumps, who do I like to hang out with? And I thought I do not like to hang out with miserable gits. I like people who are negative and naysayers and they should and I like to hang out with people who are joyful and fun and light-hearted and kids and people who just bring this lightness and love. Now, I’m not talking about the positive uh toxic positivity stuff where it’s like be happy no matter what. I’m not talking about any of that. I’m talking about being just like playful and joyful. If if the Dalai Lama and Desmond Tutu do that and they are, you know, really important spiritual leaders in our in our world. I think Desmond Tutu has died. Um, and they are really keen on joy. That’s a big big topic for them. It’s a really important practice and a very needed practice. So, I think it’s really important to bring that um into the picture. So, and I also want to talk about hurt, but before I do that, let’s hear what you have to say.
It is a it’s a really good point. And you know, joy um if we’re doing the traditional Buddhist line here, it’s one of the awakening factors. You know, it’s um it’s also one of the brahmaviharas altruistic joy or sympathetic joy or um vicarious joy. I like vicarious. So I can be happy for someone’s happiness and it help it helps counterbalance and equal out if I’m slogging through really challenging time and it’s really really hard and I have to do lots and lots of compassion and kindness to myself. It is a counterbalance to that because it that can get too kind of weighty and o you know so the joy lifts up and it’s not Yeah, that’s the thing Winnie makes such a good point. Some pe we we misinterpret as like uh overindulgent right um like I how can I be happy and joyful when all this horrible stuff is going in the world it it’s not responsible but the fact is it actually is responsible because how can we uh we have to have some uplift in our heart all the sometime because things can get really challenging in life and how do we nourish that and balance that if I’m constantly in a state I can’t meet everything with compassion. Not everything requires that. So when someone else is happy that that the the the best mind and heart state for that is to be happy for their happiness without any kind of jealous jealousness.
And it’s a practice too. So I can’t beat myself up for for not doing that when I slip into envy. Like why am I why am I not happy? I want to be happy. How come they’re happy and I’m not? That’s that’s without training. That’s kind of where my heart goes, you know? uh but but it but but it can be trained and then because it is an innate part of our our heart that that it can rejoice and be happy for others. It doesn’t have to slide into jealousy but it it takes work for some people. Some people it’s more of a natural response and yeah um so I think that’s that’s uh wants to be uh really put forth here and it can’t be stressed enough. This is actually a responsible thing for us to do is to seek out wholesome joy uh for ourselves and rejoice in the happiness of others because it is a a nourishing supportive heart quality again and I’m doing samata meditation this concentration on one object and one of the jhanic factors that arise is joy pity pity and suka pity is like this rapture uplifting kind of bubbly you know energetic uplift that’s that’s h you know that’s joyful and then suka is a more um not as it’s it’s more smooth happiness. So these are these are things that that happen when there’s um concentration practice that they they arise and they’re they’re needed for Jhana deeper states of concentration. So yes, absolutely. And the the Buddha praised these these states as well, right? And it’s the appropriateness of it as well. So I think that’s key here to joy.
So um there’s a word in English that nobody ever uses. It’s the opposite of Schadenfreude and it is confelicity. That you take joy in somebody else’s happiness. There you go. Confelicity. Why is it that in English we don’t even know our own words for being happy for somebody else? Are we such awful people? Anyway, so Emry has said, “I just had a penny drop with what you shared here.” Thank you. I’d like to work in trinities. I like to work in trinities. Shed of three and I had a part I hadn’t heard before and never saw in a context I needed to see but I just did. Yay. We love that.
We love that. Yeah, that’s very that’s that’s awesome. And yes, sometimes you get caught in only two sides, but I love you, you know, working with with three different things because it’s not always black and white, you know, square uh kinds of thinking. There’s a yeah, a try effect a lot of times. So, yeah.
So when you go ahead Yeah. So, I was going to talk about hurt cuz I’ve been meditating a lot and I think you know we take these difficult situations and we can be I mean you know I work in uh social justice transport justice basically and I’m always fighting for people who don’t have transport choice and I don’t have transport choice but I can kind of work around it but other people that makes a difference to their whether they can get to a job or a medical appointment or whatever you you know, like it has really serious implications and and so I look sometimes have to I obviously have to deal with politicians and infrastructure professionals and transport professionals and I can feel myself get really worked up and I realize that actually I feel hurt on behalf of the people who don’t have that choice and perhaps maybe my younger self. I feel hurt for that person who didn’t feel who felt very trapped and unable to have independence.
And I’ve been thinking a lot about this about dukkha actually. And there are lots of translations for dukkha, but I really like the embodied experience. So we can say the intellectual it feels unsatisfactory, but that feels a bit airy fairy up here somewhere. But I think if we bring it back down into the body and say it aches, you know, we it when we want something and we can’t get it, it aches in our body. When somebody says something that is um hurtful, what’s that is sharp and unkind or whatever or they ignore us. It hurts. It hurts in the body. So we have these like heartaches and hurts and aches and um I think that’s really where dukkha lies because it’s true that there is the physical pain. So when I go to the dentist, sorry if you’re traumatized by that, but I’m willingly putting myself into a painful situation. I get the injection, I get the cleaning, whatever. And that is unpleasant and it’s painful but I’m okay with that. So there’s no dukkha with that. So for me when I look at the what is dukkha it’s actually that there is um an experience of hurt in the body a sort of an emotional hurt and ache in the body and when I get all like they should reply to me and they should do my things and they should agree with me and all these things when I write all these letters and when I get carried away like that I go ah actually I just feel hurt or even ask myself, am I feeling hurt? No, I’m not feeling hurt. I’m like really happy and I this this is their problem. And then I go, oh no, I’m actually just hurt. But it’s really useful to sit and kind of go, ah, actually this is hurt. Because what I’ve realized is that we are resisting feeling hurt. We are resisting feeling the sort of this body ache. We are resisting feeling that and we are defending this. So when you have an ache and your body when you when your body hurts you contract. Yeah. And this gives the imp and then at the same time the mind goes once it sort of exits the body. It sort of and dulls down the body. The mind will go and then he said she said she said he said and it’s not fair and they’re an idiot and all this sort of stuff. So you have the impression that when you’re hurt or it aches that it’s all one system because then the body, you know, your tummy’s clenched, your chest is tight. Uh you can’t really feel all that and you’ve got this worrying I this and I that and them there and da da da. But it’s it’s if you just sit there and go actually I feel a hurt or an ache all that dissipates and you can start to feel it in the body. So there you go. What do you reckon Josh?
This is really timely. been dealing with this lately as well and you know the depths of this and I don’t know the the complete depths of this but my inkling my my guess is that you know there’s a low level of this inherent in all of existence you know it’s there on a low level all the time it’s just that we’re not either sensitive enough or willing enough or capable enough to really see and know the depths of this, you know, on very very subtle levels. So, but on a practical day-to-day thing, I’ve been working with this too, or maybe not working as much as I’d like because I’ve um and I’ve noticed what I’ve been seeing as a pain response. And so whenever I don’t see in mindful of what Wendy’s talking about, then I can give a pain response that I that I basically don’t want to give, you know. But that’s why mindfulness I think and uh feeling and seeing and knowing is so important because when I have the the mindfulness and the heartfulness to to see and know what Wendy’s talking about, then I have more of a choice how I’m going to how I’m going to uh view this and respond to what Wendy’s talking about because that’s what it is. And uh yeah the emotional pain it’s usually has a correspondence in the body of a effect that when he was talking tightening in the chest you know for me there is some kind of maybe psychic pain or mental pain sometimes and it’s like in the head or just kind of a scattering and um yeah that that’s that’s an effect too. So sometimes I’m not connected to my body and that’s not an option. So then there’s there’s other things I have to deal with like okay maybe it’s showing up as chaos or in my life or like a a scattered mind and you know that those can also be indications when those of us aren’t as connected to our bodies sometimes and need other indicators to see okay there’s pain here and and uh what kind of pain response is happening or not happening. Um, and the benefit for me of seeing this is then then um it helps when I can catch it, it I can help contain it. Um, and I’m far from being uh anywhere successful at this. But when I do and then I can say, okay, I have a choice. I can say something that could actually be more hurtful to myself and another or I can refrain from saying something right now and wait till the time is more appropriate to respond, you know. So yeah, I think it also for me it has to do with restraint a lot of times and and actually not restraining when I need to restrain and pull back and actually just feel the pain, you know, and say, “Oh, oh, yeah. Oh, this is this is this is dukkha. This is this is pain, you know, now.” And then that’s the first step because yes, like we were talking, everything’s going to be we’re going to have moments of pain. You don’t get out of a human existence without pain. However, what we then do about that and how we view it and respond to it is going to make the difference between adding piles and piles and piles of extra suffering on top of that pain or dealing with it in a way that that will minimize or help not do that. And it’s tricky too, I think, because sometimes it it it feels so good to be angry, right? They talk about like a honey tip and poison root of anger. Sometimes it feels so good to be justified that I’m right, but at the end of the day it’s it it’s only like momentary and then there’s consequences and fallout of that, you know, either from feeling shameful and guilty about it or actually having um another like nobody wants to be lashed out on, right? So they they some people can lash back out on me and then it just keeps compounding and compounding and compounding. But this notion that it oh it feels so good to just be right and lash out and say my choice and but I but I found that’s not really a solution long term, right? I I guess it’s it’s it’s understandable in some senses and it’s not as simple straightforward as this either because you know some some of us have been felt and this isn’t me because I had no uh shyness coming up about emotionally conflict with my family. We just mired it and we were all doing the best we could but we didn’t really have any tools or anything to know how to do anything different unfortunately. But some people they’ve been they they’ve suppressed. They think, “Oh, I need to be like Wendy was talking. I need to be the good girl. I know. I I need to be the good boy and be make sure everything is going okay and make sure everybody’s happy and I don’t want to show any kind of anger or anything because you know I’m not really allowed to or you know I or for whatever reasons, right?” And so then when they they find out, oh wow, I’ve been suppressing this and then I need to deal with this in a different way. one of the options then I guess is to come out um and just just express it you know um and now I think yeah we so I think that’s that’s enough to get to get us started here and I’ve been going on a little bit but um to bring it back to Wendy’s point feeling it in the body is so helpful because it does dissipate if I can just sit and be with it and say oh yes this is this is pain and you just feel it really deeply without really any kind of judgment and like I was taking care of a 5-year-old child in pain, you know, and how would I respond to that 5-year-old child in pain and and giving that to myself and when when um it will dissipate, right? It will dissipate and it’s okay um to feel it because because it’s there anyway, right?
So, I want to just uh question this thing about pain because I don’t think it is pain. I think it is hurt. And I want to distinguish because I I I think what the ego does is it says I I’m not not hurt. I don’t hurt. And so there’s a whole lot of different strategies that the mind will do to say I’m never hurt. And and I know that I used to say, “Oh, I don’t feel hurt.” And I know I meet other people and they say, “Oh, I don’t feel hurt.” You know, it takes a lot to hurt me. And I know that that’s not true for me anymore. I look back and I’m like, “Oh man, I was like one big hurt giant bumblebee, you know, or bubble of whatever.” And um uh so and the people who say, “Oh, it’s takes a lot to hurt me.” are the ones you want to go. They’re really likely to get really hurt really quickly.
So I think it’s really important to just really lean into terrible expression but really allow your yourself to experience hurt because it’s not pain because when you go to the dentist that’s pain but when you are in this experience when it’s relational it’s actually hurt and you can have a relationship with your body like why does this why does my cancer do this or why you know why my one of our volunteers and she’s going I get all these migraines and the migraine is separate from her and she’s hurt by the fact that these migraines are hurting her and yes it’s excruciatingly painful and it knocks her out so I’m not belittling the enormous physical pain and the debilitation and the disability that arises for people who experience a lot of migraines but um I do want to say that hurt and pain are different. That’s all.
Thank you so much. It absolutely couldn’t agree more and that’s it’s it’s a really significant um difference you know and u correction and I just look back in my own not to get too overly confessional or um you know go on go on go it’s more fun if you if you speak about your direct experience. Well, sure. It’s more helpful. Absolutely. It’s more helpful if you sort of speak in theoretical abstract terms. It’s like, you know, who cares? I don’t care if I can get that out of a book, you know. So, give me the real McCoy here. I want the real thing, Josh.
Totally. And it’s way more juicy. And I I I don’t know if the these uh fighter jets are showing up, but yeah, I totally agree. However, I do like lots of books and lots of study, too. So, but to remind uh thanks for the reminder. We’re we’re not reading a book here, right? we’re having a conversation and talking. So, it’s this isn’t a uh classroom setting as far as I know. So, but the the the hurt thing, yes, you know, I I look back in the really low points of my life and there was so much hurt that I and I didn’t have any kind of tools or know how to deal with it and the only thing that I could think of is I want someone this is horrible, you know, and I’m so glad that this is not the case anymore as far as I know or it’s very rare. Thank goodness I hope so too that I’m not being delusional in this is that I I was I felt so hurt that I just wanted someone to feel the the amount of hurt that I was going through you know like that was going to be any kind any better for me or anyone else. But there was no kind of reasoning. There was no kind of I would say hardly ethics of course around that, you know, especially not the ethics of non-harming. It was just that I’m in pain and I hurt and I want somebody else to know what I’m going through. You know what I mean? and this denial or this um this delusion that my hurt is is is unique and that no one else can really relate to it. And that makes it even worse, right? Because we know that’s not true. I mean, of course, it’s not going to be exactly the same as someone else’s hurt pain, but it’s going to be similar, you know, and this notion that my hurt is so unique that, you know, that and that I really want to cling to my special flavor of dukkha because it’s so it’s it’s mine and that’s what I know and it’s it’s kind of unique. No, not really. You know what I mean? It’s there’s nothing really special about it. Um, usually now now I don’t want to be not to be insensitive, but what I’m saying is that um, sometimes I can also cling on to my my special version of of what I’m going through, but it is a universality. We all suffer, you know, until we’re fully awakened. Oh, yeah. I know. But I mean, you know, it’s quite, you know, the whole, “Oh, woe is me. My life is terrible, which often comes with alcohol. I find it’s they they come together, you know, like you get the up and then you get the down. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And good point. I was that that was when I used to drink, too, you know. Yeah. So, very good point.
Yeah. Yeah. So, now we’re talking about uh the our installment. How do we how do we bring peace? To me, it’s like we bring peace to it by acknowledging that we feel hurt or we have an ache, a heartache. And I also want to put in this caveat that when it something really awful happens, you know, you you hear about people and their loved one dies and people are told, you know, they have to kind of come to terms with it and go through it and stuff, but they’re sort of living in denial. And I’m just going, “Wow, you know, give it a break because it’s really awful sometimes.” And denial sometimes is the right response. It because it keeps you psychologically safe during a really tough period. It’s not healthy to live like that forever, but if that’s what gets you through a really bad phase, hey, I’m all for it.
So, just to put that in there. Um, so how do we cultivate and support peace in formal meditation? And I want to ask what peace means. Before I do that, I’m going to give you a United Nations definition. So I was listening to the radio and it was this guy talking about what does peace mean now in the United Nations the formal he was some big UN diplomat from wherever in the world and um he said in the United Nations which is basically the Anglo um sphere and European European peace means no conflict. But everywhere else in the world, what it means is that you you actually everybody lives with dignity because then you have peace. But if it just means no conflict, it means you’re not aware of things and you can silence things. Now in the moment, Emry says in the moment it is then when you see the larger point that it’s not. So I’m a little bit confused. Tell me in the moment. In the moment it is then when you see the larger point when it’s not.
So I’m very sorry. I I’m not quite sure I get it. So um I’m not wanting to be rude or anything, but I just don’t understand. So, but I I think that difference between um living with dignity and not living with conflict is a really useful thing here. That’s that’s my take.
You you’ve mentioned this before and it’s a really helpful point. Let me just let me guess on uh Emry’s comment. uh at least I don’t know what what the what the specific point is but this is something like if we’re focused maybe on too much minutia and we think something is the way it is but then we have a larger picture of it then we realize the what we’ve been kind of hyperfocused on then that’s that’s actually not the case because now we have a larger perspective and we can see that what we had before was only a tiny little piece of the puzzle and why it was probably still Um uh about being unique. Okay. So she said about being unique. So yeah, now now we get the now we get it. I mean Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So that’s right. Okay. So before I comment on Wendy’s uh definition of peace, you talked about and I think this is a really important point to touch on again too is the denial. And so yes, you know, if we were in in a perfect world and we all had the perfect conditions, anytime we felt hurt, we could go within and do a formal practice and address it in all the that the the highest helpful ways. But the matter of the fact is we don’t always have access to that. Um, and so we have to have other uh coping mechanisms, right, and other strategies for dealing with things. And like Wendy said, actually from what I guess the psychologists say, this denial is part of the grieving process, right? It’s one of the stages. And so just because I’m in denial about something doesn’t necessarily mean that I’m completely delusional or off track or we’ll never get through it or am I doing it wrong, right? It’s just one of these stages.
And sometimes things do get too overwhelming and or hurt too much that it’s just unbearable to be with it. And so at those times there we need other helpful ways uh not just the the the ideal way to to deal with something. So I just wanted to echo and and validate it and and amplify that point of that denial is is yeah is is part of the grieving process and in a strategy as far as I know you know now like and then like you said though if we get stuck there well then that’s another thing then we have to address that maybe in a different way. But uh okay so so you said about peace and it’s really interesting I mean yeah if we frame peace as lack of conflict then it’s almost like pre uh sub assuming that that that there’s conflict or that I’m on the edge of conflict or that it could go into conflict any moment and I don’t want conflict get it away from me you know uh that’s not peaceful and then there’s maybe an avoidant tendency or a a judging about it and um maybe or denial or lack of to to confront it, to go into it, you know, to um to be like so yeah, you’re right. So, I think that definition is helpful to a certain uh degree because who who wants a lot of extra conflict internally or externally. Yes, of course, we as far as I know, unless we’re like psychopathic, we don’t really want that or thrive on that. Or if we’re a chaos maker and think that I can somehow get some power by stirring up chaos and then and then stepping in and say, “Oh, I got this. I’m going to make order out of chaos.” kind of uh silliness that uh we hear the slogan order of chaos, but if they’re deliberately stirring up chaos so they can step in and then control it and so that’s that’s something else and that’s ridiculous. Um so I’m not not necessarily talking about that. So, but dignity. So, that brings it it it takes it away from a theoretical level and it puts it on a very humanistic day-to-day heart level. I think you know dignity you know where if I’m not treating someone with dignity including myself what what’s going on you know why is that is it because I was not treated with dignity does it feel maybe I feel justified and in being indignant you know does it feel good to be indignant um you know do I feel do I feel like I can now uh feel better about myself because I can put someone else down and not des or maybe I’m just too overwhelmed and stressed and I can’t I need to show myself dignity before I can express it to another or consider it for another because I’m so stressed out now that I can’t even show myself dignity, you know. So, I think yes, um I they both go hand in hand, but I do feel that this dignity thing is that we’re all deserving of that and that’s where we’re all on equal footing is that we’re all worthy of of dignity, you know. And I’m not there all the time either. Of course, there’s times when I lack dignity for myself and others, you know, and and I appreciate being called out on it because that way I can change uh if I don’t see it, you know.
Yeah, I think there’s definitely a lot in there. So, here in your I’ve just got the um video here on my right. It says areas of exploration may include the conditions that give rise to and sustain peace. And I think we’ve just talked about that how it is revealed or obscured obscured in relationship and I think we’ve addressed that the difference between brief glimpses and more stable baselines.
Let’s go there.
Very good moderator Wendy. Yeah. So I think what we mean here is we have we all have we’ve I hope the heck that you’ve experienced peace, right? So that’s a given. And then how long? Um, so I guess if we if we reflect, where is our baseline of peace? What would we consider peaceful most of the time? If it goes a little bit away from it, then I feel like that I’ve lost peace in my life. But if I go a little bit stronger into peace, maybe really on a long retreat or you happen to be around really wise, calm, peaceful people or just the circumstances and conditions, then we kind of know the opposite end of this is, oh wow, that I’ve seen that even more peace is possible, you know.
So that’s what so that’s um so then we can kind of maybe establish our baseline if we see where we get really off track or it it gets really off track and then where it can really be solid and peaceful and so yeah so how do we I guess re reflecting on my own baseline to that you know I I honestly I I think I yeah I don’t like conflict I I and I try to avoid it actually you And it’s it’s it feels easier and nicer for me not not to do it. And so I do think I have some avoidance for conflict. And it doesn’t work too well in relationship though because we’re going to be we’re going to be uh confronted I think for the most part with with conflict whether we want it or not. So that is one of the challenges and um rewards I think of of relationship is that you can’t really avoid it. uh it’s going to come out sooner and later whether we want it to or not. I think if if I had to guess for uh a significant part of relationships, you know, I mean there’s a degrees of severity, I think. But uh yeah, so as far as baseline, I think my baseline is actually not so healthy, you know. I think I’m uh avoidant when it comes to conflict and then it ends up coming out kind of all at once because I’ve been lazy and neglectful um for something that needs to be addressed headon and in depth in more detail until it’s too late and then it can kind of turn into conflict sometimes. And in conflict I just mean like okay I can’t get out of this where we have to address it now. There’s no other option you know we can’t put this off anymore. it needs to be gone through right now.
I think it’s it’s hard, you know, when you’re in a relationship. I mean, relationships are hard, you know, and I was thinking I think the anglosphere is very um conflict averse and there’s lots of silences and withdrawal that arise rather than, you know, say in I’m going to be a bit stereotypical, but like an Italian family or in other families where it’s more robust, they have these really stronger relationships. And um so just while I think about it, M Reed has said great definition. This was I think before about conflict peace. Great definition. Thank you for sharing it. Sharing it says so much about our current times. And she’s now said we start with where we are real authentic. Look into it. Awesome chat. Love the chat. Um thank you. So, where was I before I interrupted myself?
Well, we were we were talking about conflict and I I just it doesn’t necessarily have to escalate conflict address so I you know when you when I you know in poor communities they actually get used to conflict because they’re so dependent on each other and they they have these big baries and they they get used to relationships. But in the Anglosphere, middle class and up, we we don’t like that. We just do no speakies and all that sort of stuff. And I I feel that that can be really an unhelpful way.
I’ve you know, I’ve lived in Sweden and I think the Germanic side of the Anglosphere is a bit like that. Um whereas in I’ve also lived in France and they are more robust and they family is more important and they you know let you know things. So I think I think it is an an I think the anglosphere is an anomaly in terms of conflict. And we think that when conflict must mean an argument, we think a conflict must mean that we are hurting each other. But I’ve been sort of looking at this sense of hurt and ache a lot and thinking what if we’re so not allowing ourselves to enter into the body to feel the body. You know, I realized after living in England that they kind of anything to do with the body is completely denied through their sense of humor and everything. You know, that the way they dress, the way they eat, the way they use alcohol, the way they present themselves, it’s all sort of anti-body. And I and I think as I you know I’ve got English heritage. As I think about that um and that denial of the body when you feel hurt it feels such a shock to be connected with the body. And so maybe conflict is just saying well this is a bit uncomfortable boys and girls. Let’s have this is a bit miserable. is a bit and maybe what we can do is come forward gently.
But it’s really frustrating. People park on the footpath near the vape shop. Drives me mad. Vapes are illegal here. And I see them parked on the footpath and they block it and I have to ride on the road. It’s really dangerous for me. and I’m railing at them and yelling into the shop and you know I have my days because I get really tired of it. And I think when we don’t when we don’t feel we have resources that’s when we get into this argumentative space as opposed to conflict being well you think this and I think this and let’s have a you know a lovely we chat about it.
Yeah, really good stuff, Wendy. The uh Yeah. So, the that’s that’s the thing that’s so great about meditation is that uh when we’re not in relationship and there is some kind of hurt there and some kind of what what does that boil down to? Uh in one sense, maybe it’s too ins sensitive or oversimplified. It’s unpleasantness in the body. There’s unpleasantness in the body. Now, this isn’t the full extent. There could actually be some abuse that needs to be uh dealt with, right? But when we’re dealing with it on the cushion, um this hurt, I think, can can be simplified down or in one degree to okay, what is my threshold for being with hurt, unpleasantness in the body, you know, how do I do that? What are the benefits of why should I bother doing that? What’s the point of that? how is it going to help me? And uh yeah, so this is this is what it comes down to.
And if if if I can address some of the those own questions, I would say um it’s happening anyway. It’s it’s it’s when I become aware of it that I can really have a choice of how to deal with it. But I look at my own when when I when I can deeply feel it and be with it, then it it tends to dissipate. Then I realize then I have a sensitivity. Then I have kind of a feedback of my own um my own voice and what I say and what other people say to me. There’s an increased sensitivity. So then when when I have more of a feedback that’s I think more instantaneous um more direct more sensitive then I can then I can get uh quickly oh when I say this it might have these impacts when I don’t say this when I don’t listen u when I try to be avoidant or when I be too direct when I’m not a direct enough these are kind of the the feedback and responses and it’s not like I have to think about all this in micromanagement. It it’s it’s um can be felt in real time effortlessly in the body sometimes, right? And so then there’s just comes into intuitively having a sense a wise sense of uh how to think uh speak and act that’s going to have an impact on others and myself and kind of let wisdom take the reigns on what to know and realize that I’m not going to get it right all the time. I’m going to screw up. Uh but there’s a willingness to go forward and and to and continue doing the best I can. And if I could do better, I would. And allow that to inform um how I am. And using the outcome to reflect on, okay, what kind of intentions do I need to adjust here? Um what kind of speech and action do I need to do different? What what’s what’s helpful? You know, what kind of thing is going to be helpful? um in my speech and actions with others that’s going to lead towards uh my well-being and theirs, you know, and it’s it’s an ongoing learning process in these things in in in life and and how to do it. And you know, a big support too is having friends like Wendy and someone I can talk to that’s on the same page, has the same interest, has kind of on the same path and that can keep me in check, you know, that can show me my blind spots, call me out, but not do so out of hate and spite, you know, or unhelpful. Yeah. Right. But like there’s a genuine caring and interest to to to for for well-being, you know, and that we’re we’re all figuring our way out through this and we can help each other when we can, you know, and uh teachers, too. So, so all right. So, I think I was just thinking about my vape shop and they park and they they it’s illegal. They get closed down. They’ve got their trading thing and you know, I contact the uh various um authorities and go they’ve got their little because I’m like really ped because I you know it’s unsafe and it drives me nuts. So here you are. See I’m getting really worked up about this cuz it drives me nuts cuz they shouldn’t be pugging the footpath. So, I’m going nuts. And so tell me like, you know, it’s like people who rail at the television, you know, Uncle Uncle Bob, he’s always railing at the television, you know, and so how do we like without being all avoidant and kind of fake and like theoretical when you’re really worked up like, okay, I can I actually know the police constable. So I could write to the police constable for highway high highway patrol and just email him and go right just so you know. So I should do that but I think it’s good to yell don’t yell don’t park on the foot path too cuz for me I just feel like mind you I’m also a bit nervous that one of them’s going to come after me and run me down while I’m on my bicycle. So that’s the problem with anger, you know, we think it can make us safe. And I I used to have such a foul temper. Then I started counting up how many times getting angry made me safe. And I was like, oh, not very many. And how many times does it make me feel unsafe? Well, plenty actually. So that that made me kind of keep in check. But I don’t want to be fake and I don’t want to be suppression and I don’t want to avoid and like what do you do when you’re kind of something like that where you’re physically harmed and you’re frustrated that this keeps coming up and it’s an illegal thing and you know they’re thugs. They’re all gangs run by gangs and stuff. They have no compunction about anything. Now you tell me how I deal with that, Josh.
Well, as a female, you don’t do it this way. um with as a guy this is a little bit more um likely to do. Although I don’t know if I could recommend it either. I’d have to see, you know, the extent of it, how big it is, and how many friends I have to take with me, you know. So, so to me, when it’s in a a challenging situation, if I can and it feels safe to do, uh, even though it takes it takes a lot of courage, it this doesn’t apply to Wendy. I’m sorry, but this would this is maybe how I might deal with it. Is actually just to walk up and say, “Hey, bro. What’s going on? How’s it going here?” And just I’m just two minutes. I’m just two minutes. What’s your problem? No, but see, that’s the thing. Like if um if you were on Okay, so put yourself in in their shoes and if someone was yelling and screaming, I can walk 50 meters and 100 meters down the road. It’s not impossible. This is exactly how I feel. Bam.
This this brings me to then the next point that I’ve been working with a lot lately is it’s um what we say, but also how we say it, you know. So, how receptive and you know this doesn’t really apply to to to gang members too because they they operate on a different rule set as well. So, I don’t recommend also going in there and being harmful or the tough guy either, you know, but I wonder how and not as Wendy, but if some guys out there around Wendy’s neighborhood that have had enough of it, too. Yeah.
Come on. But this is where it’s really important is is how you do it because this is actually potentially dangerous situation. But I don’t think it’s beyond going in with the right heart and the right attitude in the right way. Not being a pushover, but not being overly aggressive and and and condemning either, but just say, “Hey, what I don’t know exactly how to say it, but how you say it is going to be important. But is there I’ll just say, is there a possibility for some guys to go up there and directly talk to them and just see what’s going on? see what the options are here, you know, and I don’t I don’t I don’t know if that would be too wise because it is illegal. That’s a rubbish answer, Josh.
Could you like anonymous? These are things you go you do could you could you send an anonymous message to the police so you don’t have to give your name?
I know I know the police counsel write him an email. He He would He’s fine. He He’d be all right. last time I complained about well he would he would be all right but I don’t know about you so that’s why I’m wondering if you could just contact anonymously yeah it’d be all right I’ve contacted through through the various things but the point is you know like as I was saying there probably you know it’s about me just letting off steam apart from anything else um because I get so so frustrated by it and am I better for it no but I just it’s like I just see red you know so that Yeah. What do you do with that?
What do you do? Because it’s completely valid. It’s completely valid. It’s completely valid feeling. Of course, I’m completely right, Josh. There you go. Finally, I’ve convinced you. I’m right. Of course, I’m right. But they’re still there. You’re right. But they’re still there, right?
I know. See, then then then how does it work? Like, what do you do in that situation? Normally, I’m pretty I I’m pretty pretty chill and I’m I’m much better about that. And I do it a bit more jovially. I’m I don’t do it with like All right. You don’t park on the book path a little bit. But I do kind of, you know, do that and and sometimes, you know, I go, “Stop parking on the foot path.” They go, “Oh, sorry.” So, there have been patrons who who have done that, but it’s just, you know, it’s like they shut down the vape shop and it was fantastic. I didn’t have to worry about my safety. It was fantastic. And then it popped back up cuz they’re thugs. So, it it is Yeah. Yeah, you go go in there. Go in there and buy it and buy a vape from them and then break it right in front of their face, throw it on the ground and walk out without saying a word. What about that?
Cost me money. I’m not going to give those sons money by goodwill, young man.
Yeah.
So, you see, but but I think we get we we we get like caught in these things and it’s really hard when we’re we’re in that thing and it’s that thing that drives us mad and we’re railing at the telly and we look at those I don’t know politicians or people or whatever and we just kind of blood boils, you know. Yeah. And it’s I I think they they they pray on that actually. They deliberately show things that are going to be emotionally triggering because that’s what sells ads. You know, oh, how dare they? How could they? Can you believe this? Well, that’s what that’s they’re deliberately putting material and presenting material in a certain way that will deliberately uh invoke those responses because then I’m emotionally invested involved and that’s very powerful and alluring and charging, you know. So, that’s the thing. Yeah. But you actually have a real life situation, not something that was deliberately manufactured on a wide scale to have an emotional or trigger response, right? Yeah. So this is this is your work, right? Yeah.
Yeah. I mean, it it the thing is that it wasn’t such a problem and then it’s just when the vape shop is there and people are desperate because they’re all like exactly, you know, those stupid vapes. Um, and you know, and and they hate them. like people I know it just they hate them. I’m I meet people and they go I I they’re more addictive than even cigarettes, you know. Yeah. Yeah. Um so yeah. Um if if we look so if you know if we look at that the behavior is at least I know when I used to smoke it’s because I was nervous uh I didn’t feel good and then when I smoked cigarette I felt some sense of false basically or very conditional peace and relaxation right it felt like a release and there was a a few minutes of calm and ease until it wore off and then I had to have another like you’re saying it’s highly addictive but if we look at the root of that there there’s hurt and pain there and this is one of the ways that they’ve been suckered into dealing with that because they don’t have any other resources and that’s the other thing you mentioned about trauma the definition I heard of trauma I really like is un integrated resources so yeah I think that’s it so yeah you talked about resourcing and it’s like having resources or whatever resources we do have because I think everybody has some but they’re just not kind of integrated properly. But, you know, that doesn’t make their behavior right though. You know, that doesn’t make that it doesn’t make that Yeah. I’m not saying what they’re doing is right because they’re in pain. No, but if we’re trying to have some kind of baseline understanding, they’re in extreme pain and that’s that’s one of the ways they’re dealing with it. Now, how they’re dealing with it, not not okay. And and actually you rais a really good point because I need to just look in the mirror and know that when I was a driver and when I used to and I used to park on the foot path, what’s wrong with parking on the footpath? And I was very well, yeah, I can’t park anywhere else. Got to park on the foot path. And I was completely selfish. So yeah. So, I think I’m just arguing with myself to be honest, you know, and I think I think I’m just being adversarial because I’m not putting myself in my in my own shadow experience, you know. Maybe I’m overly practical, but I think if there was a choice for somewhere else for them to park other than the footpath, they wouldn’t park in the foot path. But the it’s the opportunity is not even there, you know. And I think maybe you’re if I’m had to venture a guess, you you might feel invalidated for the work you’re doing. You know, here I’m trying to do this and make things better for people. I’m being completely disregarded. They don’t even think, you know what I mean? Absolutely. And how I’m You see me after all this work I’ve done, I’ve devoted my life to this and they just they’re completely ignoring it. They are off my Christmas card list. Let me tell you, Josh. Okay.
So, yes, but it just goes to show, you know, you know, we kind of work workshop that in real time because I’m going actually there was one person who had this stupid big van and it was completely enormous and I couldn’t pass. And yes, there are parking spaces over there, but they don’t, you know, the footpath, the road, everything’s just car. You know, when you’re in a car, you just think, “Oh, well, it’s just everything’s there for a car.” And I used to be exactly the same. And um and actually I’ve conflated all these things together and I’m now going to write to my police officer friend and just go, “All right, by the way, they’re doing this. They’re driving me nuts.” So, I’ll do it in a more formal tone.
So, we’re coming up to the end. Josh, yes, we are. How do you feel about today’s little catchup?
I feel we I have a long way to go to be uh more peaceful and I want you all listening to this to chime in and actually say how you find peace and ease in your practice in your life because I can use the more help as well and yeah so and but I’m aiming towards it and peace is said to be the highest happiness ease is one of the things in the Metta Sutta I thought about reading the Metta Sutta again on here because it’s short but we’re we’re out of time Now, and one of the things that’s repeated in there, may all beings be at ease. And it is a great wish and and the highest happiness, you know, and it’s an ongoing uh work in process for us too, but it is also available in our hearts. So, it’s not anything super special. Uh but it it it it does take cultivating and um and and yeah, dealing with things the way we can best deal with them when we’re able to. I guess hopefully that’s not too convoluted and watered down, but I I wish everyone peace here and peace and ease in their hearts, in their lives, in their relationships, in the world at large, too. And um you think, well, maybe that’s wishy-washy, you know, hopeful uh thing that that’s not practical. But what it does is it starts uh pointing and aiming the heart in in a right direction. And it’s for me too because it conditions the heart. And so the the more I can work and condition or I don’t know about work but you know incline the heart and mind in that sense and have a genuine sense of goodness and well-being then that really does uh have an impact on the heart and then by default those I come into contact just be more likely that I won’t be such a sour sour puss um uh when I don’t have to be you know or I can see maybe I have a choice now and I’m I’m treating myself with some peace and ease so maybe that will rub off in in the relationships around me. So, and I’m the first recipient of my well-wishing and and u alignment and wanting peace. So, and I think have a bit of joy. Take yourself not so seriously and look at what how much are you the problem I think is the other one. Anyway, we’re out of time.
We’re out of time. One one more point just I learned the other day too. How much priority are we putting on something? Am I giving it too much of importance? Like Wendy said, am I taking this too seriously? You know, I’m putting too much importance on this. You know, is it really that important as well? So, yes, as Wendy says, have fun and we’ll catch you next time. Right.
Due to the size of this chapter this is part 1 of the eleventh chapter “Happiness” (spanning to the end of subchapter 11.8 “Review of Different Forms of Happiness”) from the book:
Buddhadhamma: The Laws Of Nature And Their Benefits To Life by Bhikkhu P. A. Payutto (Somdet Phra Buddhaghosacariya)
[Brief notes before the ai assisted summary that Ajahn Dhammasiha requested audio only and requested I kept my camera on so he could see me while we talked and recorded on Dec 1, 2025. I also didn’t edit out anything and there’s lots of my stammering. Apologies if any of this comes off as too much about “me and my practice” however Ajahn skillfully leverages this on multiple levels making it applicable across many demographics and often universally too.
I’m also very grateful for him for making new connections and suggestions about practice that hadn’t occurred to me before and some of them very subtle that while I don’t really seem to be able to grasp the full depth and potential of some of these now there’s a type of intuitive sense that these seeds have potential for major impact and fruit down the line when wisdom and pāramī ripen. Also, I reflexively stopped the recording too early so it ends abruptly truncating Ajahn’s closing thanks]
(Ai assist:) Ajahn Dhammasiha (from Dhammagiri Forest Hermitage, Brisbane) and I explore the Buddha’s instructions on Ānāpānasati (mindfulness of breathing) from MN 118. We emphasize that breath meditation is meant to be joyful — “breathing in having fun, breathing out having fun” — and that true joy arises from wholesome, non-sensual happiness (pīti & sukha). The discussion covers the importance of strong ethical foundations (sīla) and good kamma, the difference between worldly and spiritual happiness, how the breath is experienced as whole-body energy/prāna, the value of calming thought completely, when to supplement ānāpānasati with other practices (especially mettā), practical challenges of maintaining the breath in daily lay life, and the need to stay aware not only of the breath but also of the state of the mind itself.
Chapters:
0:00 – Introduction & weather small-talk 0:50 – Jumping into Ānāpānasati – “Breathing in having fun” 2:18 – The Buddha’s own words: training in rapture (pīti) & happiness (sukha) 3:51 – Wholesome vs unwholesome “fun”; the Bodhisatta’s past mistake 5:51 – The Bodhisatta’s journey: jhāna → austerity → middle way under the rose-apple tree 7:23 – The 16 steps of Ānāpānasati (MN 118) & why it was the Buddha’s favourite practice 9:12 – Common challenges & the absolute necessity of foundations (sīla + puñña) 13:03 – Personal stories: healing, giving up alcohol, the power of precepts 17:20 – Recalling goodness & mettā before sitting; breath as whole-body energy/prāna 20:15 – Reflection/contemplation vs silent observation in meditation 22:16 – Calming thought completely – the unique gift of ānāpānasati 26:05 – When the mind “can’t take more quiet” → switch to walking + reflection 29:07 – Training wholesome thinking first, then silencing it 32:32 – Ānāpānasati in daily life & jobs – be realistic, use transitions (e.g. mettā) 37:29 – Supplementing breath meditation with mettā, compassion, body contemplation, etc. 39:58 – Continuity of practice & retreat vs lay-life realities 43:24 – Awareness of the breath AND awareness of the state of the mind 45:58 – Closing thanks & invitation to Dhammagiri Forest Hermitage 46:33 – Monastery info, daily program, Bodhi trees in Brisbane — Related link mentioned: https://integratingpresence.com/2020/12/21/historical-trees-of-enlightenment/
Power of Bodh Gaya, Place of Buddha’s Enlightenment | Mahabodhi Temple | Vajirasana Diamond Throne | Ajahn Dhammasiha July 14, 2025 https://overcast.fm/+pBqoCSfJc
I initially found Dhammagiri through searching a Venerable Kalyano that a Dhamma friend mentioned and found a different Venerable Kalyano and was fascinated by this: How Do Relics Appear? | Ajahn Kalyano | Ascent to Stupa on Summit | Dhammagiri Stupa Consecration 02 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nf_FiVkO41Q . . . (shorter audio selection version: https://overcast.fm/+pBqqcGP7Y)
Things change and I’m due back in Denmark earlier than originally planned. In this fortieth installment of the ongoing live series with Wendy Nash inquiring into meditation practice on and off the cushion we delve into the areas of worship, respect and inspiration. How can some activities like pujas (easily) get attributed to worship when they are not actually that? How can we not fall into (blind) worship? Where and how does inspiration and that which deserves respect play into this? And where does all this fit into meditation practice? (This episode was originally spurred primarily by the billboard below)
In Buddhism, and in other religions, access to and dwelling in the heart-tone of bright kamma is occasioned by devotion and recollection. In Buddhism, this is called ‘pūja’ – an act of raising up, and honouring that which is worthy of our respect. The very fact that there are human models and actions that one can feel deep respect for is itself a blessing to take note of: honouring opens and uplifts the heart. With pūja, we attend to a skilful felt meaning, linger there and allow the effects to nourish the citta. From this basis, it’s likely that inclinations or even specific ideas in line with bright kamma will arise. Either that, or the mind easily settles into a state that supports meditation. This is how and why one should linger in any bright kamma.
So in the act of honouring the Buddha, one first opens the heart in respect and brings to mind the meaning of an Awakened One: someone of deep clarity; a speaker of truths that penetrate and bring healing to the human condition; one accomplished in understanding and action – a sage whose teachings can still be tested and put into action. If one has a Buddha-image, it’s something that should be held with respect – one cleans it, illuminates it with light, and offers flowers and incense to it. We place it on an altar, bow to it and chant recollections and teachings.
This is not a mindless activity; we use ritual means and resound words and phrases because this full engagement embodies and strengthens the quality of respect in a way that thinking can’t. With the openness of heart that these attitudes bring, any aspect of the teaching that’s brought to mind goes deeper.The act of offering that begins a pūja is a case in point: offering flowers symbolizes bringing forth virtue, offering light is about bringing forth clarity, and incense does the same for meditative concentration. In this way, pūja introduces the heart to important Dhamma themes.
Pūja is especially helpful when people perform it as a group. Then we are participating in the Dhamma as both the expression and the Way of awakening, as well as in the collective commitment to, and engagement with, that Dhamma. This collective engagement ritualizes the ‘Sangha’, that is, the assembly of disciples. Chanting in a group has a harmonizing, settling effect: sonorous and unhurried, it steadies bodily and mental energies and supports an atmosphere of harmony with fellow practitioners. Tuning in and participating brings us out of ourselves and into a deep resonance with heart-impressions of the sacred. We can be touched by a sense of timeless stability, purpose and beauty. If these intentions, felt senses and recollections are established regularly, we know where to find good heart, how to attend to it, and how to allow ourselves to be uplifted. Such kamma feels bright.
The expressions that are used in recollecting Dhamma are that it is experienced directly (not just as a theory), is of timeless significance, and is accessible and furthering for those who practice it. So that gives us an encouragement to look into what the Buddha taught and modeled: the way to the end of suffering and stress. With this, we recollect aspiration, learning and commitment as our common touchstone, and suffering and ignorance as our common challenge. Then we no longer feel so alone with our difficult mind-states, and we can handle them in a more open and aware way. Recollection of Sangha reminds us that although there is greed, anger and confusion in the human world, there are also people who cultivate a way out of that.
If you use pūja on a regular basis, it aligns you to the ‘Triple Gem’ – Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha – by presenting content in terms of images, ideas and themes, and values and practices that guide the heart. It also occasions acts of steering and composing attention. So pūja works both on what the mind is dealing with, and how it operates.
‘At any time when a disciple of the noble ones is recollecting the Tathāgata … the Dhamma … the Sangha … their own virtues: “[They are] untorn, unbroken, unspotted, unsplattered, liberating, praised by the wise, untarnished, conducive to concentration.” At any time when a disciple of the noble ones is recollecting virtue, his mind is not overcome with passion, not overcome with aversion, not overcome with delusion. His mind heads straight, based on virtue. And when the mind is headed straight, the disciple of the noble ones gains a sense of the goal, gains a sense of the Dhamma, gains joy connected with the Dhamma. In one who is joyful, rapture arises. In one who is rapturous, the body grows calm. One whose body is calmed experiences ease. In one at ease, the mind becomes concentrated.
‘Mahānāma, you should develop this recollection of virtue while you are walking, while you are standing, while you are sitting, while you are lying down, while you are busy at work, while you are resting in your home crowded with children.’
~ (A.11:12; B. BODHI, TRANS.)
. . . . ‘Or is there then, Vāseṭṭha, a single one of the Brahmans up to the seventh generation who has seen Brahmā face to face?’
‘No, indeed, Gotama!’
‘Well then, Vāseṭṭha, those ancient Rishis of the Brahmans versed in the Three Vedas, the authors of the verses, the utterers of the verses, whose ancient form of words so chanted, uttered, or composed, the Brahmans of to-day chant over again or repeat; intoning or reciting exactly as has been intoned or recited—to wit, Aṭṭhaka, Vāmaka, Vāmadeva, Vessāmitta, Yamataggi, Aṅgirasa, Bhāradvāja, Vāsettha, Kassapa, and Bhagu—did even they speak thus, saying: “We know it, we have seen it, where Brahmā is, whence Brahmā is, whither Brahmā is?”’
‘Not so, Gotama!’
‘Then you say, Vāseṭṭha, that none of the Brahmans, or of their teachers, or of their pupils, even up to the seventh generation, has ever seen Brahmā face to face. And that even the Rishis of old, the authors and utterers of the verses, of the ancient form of words which the Brahmans of to-day so carefully intone and recite precisely as they have been handed down—even they did not pretend to know or to have seen where or whence or whither Brahmā is. So that the Brahmans versed in the Three Vedas have forsooth said thus: “What we know not, what we have not seen, to a state of union with that we can show the way, and can say: ‘This is the straight path, this is the direct way which makes for salvation, and leads him, who acts according to it, into a state of union with Brahmā!’”
*There’s naturally an ongoing open call for meditation (related) questions for the (roughly) monthly “Meditation Q & A” either by the various social media means listed; integratingpresence[at]protonmail.com or just showing to type/ask live.*
Background
Regular, current and past visitors to Integrating Presence may recall the monthly series “Ask Us Anything” I did with Denny K Miu from August 2020 until January 2022 — partially including and continuing on with Lydia Grace as co-host for awhile until March 2022.
For a fewmonthsthereafter I did various Insight Timer live events exploring potential new directions and/or a continuation of the Ask Us Anything format while weaving in other related teachings to these events.
Then, after chats with meditation coach Wendy Nash, it became clear to start a new collaboration similar to “Ask Us Anything” simply and clearly called “Meditation Q & A” especially due to the original intent of the Ask Us Anything’s being “discussions about meditation and related topics.”
Audio: Worship, Respect, Inspiration | “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #40
Most welcome. This is Josh integrating presence in her skill. Today I have Wendy Nash back again. Wendy, how’s it going? Yeah, I’m here on Gabby Gabby country in Queensland in Kabula. And how’s it going? Uh, pretty good actually. I’m feeling inspired. So, not only in my dharma practice, that’s always inspiring, but also just generally in life.
So, but we’ll talk about that. Well, that’s cool. Yeah, I’m interested in hearing about that, too. Um, inspiration is always a great thing, especially uh when I’m lacking it, then it’s even more important. Um, I wouldn’t say I’m necessarily lacking it, but I don’t think I have a huge amount of it either.
But so today’s uh topic I’ve I’ve uh titled Oh, um let’s see here. I’m getting my screen up. if I just accidentally closed out one thing, but it’s called worship, respect, inspiration, and this is our 40th meditation Q&A that Wendy and I have done. So, yeah, that’s a little bit of a milestone. So, that’s cool. So, here’s the description.
I I put things um actually, I don’t need to read the the first sentence. So, in this 40th installment of the ongoing live series with Wendy Nash, inquiring into meditation practice on and off the cushion, we plan to delve into the area of worship, respect, and inspiration. Um, how can some activities like pujas, which we’ll go into what that means if you’re not familiar with the term.
How can some activities like pujas easily get attributed to worship when they are not actually that? How can we not fall into blind worship? Where and how does inspiration and that which deserves respect play into this? And where does this all fit into meditation practice? So, this came from a billboard um that I saw from a dharma friend.
And I want to see if I can actually share it on screen. Um but we’ll we’ll see. Um maybe I can I’m not prepared. Um, but maybe I can get that while while we’re talking here if it’s not too distracting. So, um, so let me just just describe that billboard before I throw it up. It shows the Buddha.
Um, this is a billboard in Thailand. It says, “The Buddha is not for decoration. Respect is common sense.” So, it shows a big red X over a Buddha head and saying no tattoos, meaning no Buddha tattoos. And basically, now I’m missing the other image. It’s there’s um an image basically saying they’re not for Oh, here it’s it’s wrong to use symbols of Buddha in the in the bar for decoration or tattoos. This means no respect.
And I also want to talk about this Buddha head too that’s in a retreat center that I was at that is interesting and how this um there’s certain um removals now of Buddhahads and and whatever. So we can we can talk about that. But so I just want to throw it over to Wendy here to see what Wendy makes of all this and where we should start with this too.
Yeah, it’s an interesting thing. So a long while ago I was in a cafe and they had a Buddha sitting on the counter and they had business cards on it and it was like a business card holder. And so I said to one of the people behind the counter, I said, “Would you have Mary or Jesus?” Turned out she was French.
So, um, she’s deeply Catholic. And she said, “Oh, no. This is completely offensive.” And, and I thought this was a really good way of describing it. Well, would you have, you know, Mary or Jesus do doing that, you know, and how how would that be? So I think we have as a sort of a non less religious society not understood that for some people Jesus, Mary, Buddha, the prophet Muhammad, whoever it is are key figures and you can’t des you know, you know, what is the word? Descrate. Descrate. Yeah.
(Ai assist:) Saw Myint(a 52-year-old woman originally from Myanmar, now living in Sydney, Australia) shares her personal journey of healing from childhood trauma and mental health challenges through practical, non-religious insights inspired by Buddhist teachings.
Saw Myint is a qualified mortgage broker with a background in accounting who has also ventured into property development. She describes her difficult early years under age 10. Living in a comfortable but neglectful family environment in Myanmar, she endured exploitation and mistreatment by an aunt who lived in the household, treating her like a servant (tasks such as washing and ironing) while her parents—often fighting—remained unaware or uninvolved. This unresolved trauma lingered as painful memories and attachments, nearly leading her toward destructive paths, but she avoided them and instead channeled the experience into building resilience, humility, and strong interpersonal skills that later fueled her professional success in business and client relations.
Since her early 20s, Saw Myint has dedicated time, money, skills, and connections to helping others, particularly immigrants and those in need in her home country and Australia. At age 30, she deepened her engagement with Buddhist principles—not as a religion, but as a pragmatic, testable approach to reality emphasizing self-reliance, impermanence (anicca), and the end of stress/dukkha. She credits these insights with her recovery and forgiveness, enabling her to view even the abuse as a paradoxical gift that shaped her positively while rejecting any justification for harm.
Through her charity Wake Up, she promotes mental health awareness, urging people to seek help via helplines and professionals, especially in confusing or grey areas of suffering. She emphasizes promoting accessible support, as those in pain often feel too confused or scared to reach out.
Saw Myint presents two practical steps for well-being, accessible without formal meditation:
The Easy Step: In daily life, observe that good and bad experiences (pleasure, pain, success, loss) arise and pass quickly. What remains is memory, imagination, and attachment—not the events themselves, which are gone. By recognizing impermanence, one avoids clinging to the past or chasing endless satisfaction, fostering balance, reduced stress, and peaceful acceptance—even in facing death, illness, or loss.
The Advanced Step: Drawing on science (mind and body processes moving millions of times per second) and simplified Buddhist psychology, she explains that feelings (good or bad) always lag behind reality—based on what has already ceased. Thus, experiences feel dream-like or illusory: “nothing is real, everything is an image.” Believing this (even without direct meditative insight) shifts behavior toward letting go, presence, and equanimity. . . . .
[Note: I, Josh, forgot to mention it during recording so added in the intro that this perception in the advanced step requires strong ethical commitment to non-harming and must not excuse any misconduct because if there is not strong ethical commitment, and there’s a unbalanced perception of “nothing is real” then this could falsely provide grounds for giving excuses for harming a la “it doesn’t matter, it is not real.” If nothing is real and nothing matters then this could also incentivize lack of right effort because “there’s no point to anything if nothing is real”. This is not what Saw means. I just wanted to put this in here to clear up any potential misunderstandings. I also forgot to mention that I find that belief and disbelief are not necessary when it comes to this. Belief and disbelief can be set aside while picking up these steps to try them out for oneself]
Throughout, Saw Myint stresses human imperfection (“we’re all a little crazy”), the value of feeling emotions without dragging them on, comparing oneself only to one’s past self, and letting go repeatedly for a balanced, happier life. She avoids dogma, aligns teachings with universal science, and expresses a desire to spread these ideas decentralized (inspired by S.N. Goenka’s model) via communities rather than centralized centers.
The episode concludes with her invitation to connect via her Facebook page for direct help or collaboration in teaching others, and a warm reminder: good and bad feelings pass—feel them, then move on and let go.
Takeaways:
Saw emphasizes the importance of mental health awareness.
Buddhism offers practical strategies for personal growth.
Good and bad feelings are temporary and should not be clung to.
Childhood experiences can shape our adult lives significantly.
Helping others is a key part of healing oneself.
Impermanence is a fundamental aspect of life that we must accept.
Self-awareness is crucial for emotional well-being.
Letting go of attachments can lead to a more balanced life.
The mind and body are interconnected in our overall health.
Charity and community support are vital for mental health advocacy.
(Approximate) Chapters:
0:00 Intro & Important Ethics Disclaimer 1:07 Guest Introduction – Saw Mint from Myanmar/Australia 2:25 From Accounting to Mortgage Broking – Life & Charity Path 3:12 Childhood Trauma & Early Mental Health Struggles 11:15 How the Aunt’s Treatment Shaped Her (and the Silver Lining) 13:59 Moving to Australia & Starting to Help Others 15:19 Discovering Buddhism at 30 – Recovery & Forgiveness 16:10 Charity “Wake Up” – Why the Name & Mission 17:49 Impermanence Basics: Good & Bad Things Don’t Last 19:37 Memory, Imagination & Attachment – What’s Really Causing Pain? 20:58 Easy Step 1: Notice Feelings Pass in Daily Life (No Formal Meditation Needed) 22:37 Death Reminder – Wake Up, Everything Changes Anytime 25:04 Advanced Step 2: Science + Buddha – Mind/Body Moving Millions Times/Second 26:51 Everything We Feel Is Already Gone – Dream-Like Reality 29:34 “Nothing Is Real” – Letting Go of the Illusion 33:18 Mind Precedes All Things – Dhammapada Insight 36:05 Practice Tip: Focus on Yourself, Be Present, Compound Effect 39:26 No True Present Moment – Continuous Letting Go 41:30 Feel It, Then Let It Go – We’re Still Human 44:22 Acceptance & Turning Pain into Growth 46:13 How to Connect with Saw Mint & Spread the Teachings 47:56 Final Message: Good & Bad Don’t Last – Just Move On 49:13 Closing & Goodbye
Audio: Wake Up! Nothing Lasts Forever: Saw Myint’s Practical Steps to Release Stress And How Certain Concepts Of Impermanence Can Help Heal Trauma And Build Balance
Unedited transcript via YouTube:
And just a brief disclaimer for this upcoming episode
when she uses this step two technique
that basically kind of arrives at a concept a perception of nothing is real,
everything is an image. Um, she’ll go into detail. I don’t want to spoil too much, but with as with any
of these types of things in spirituality, even though it came up at the time, I didn’t say it that it needs
to be taken with ethics and it’s not an excuse
to behave however you want or do anything you want because nothing is real. It’s all a dream. So, who cares
what I think, say, and do? It doesn’t matter if everything isn’t real like a dream, right? That’s not what we’re
saying. So there needs to be a strong commitment to nonharming in ethics when
we take on a concept or perception like this and you’ll see the relevance as she
explains it into the episode. So thanks and enjoy. Hello. Hey, this is Josh from
Integrating Presence and today I have Saw Mint with me. So how’s it going today?
Good, good, good. The sun is shining over here 11 10 11 a.m. in Sydney,
Australia. Everything good? How’s everyone? Yeah, thanks for having me here, George.
You’re you’re welcome. And so I was from Bur Burma, Myanmar, and where my
meditation teacher happens to be from too. So I’m um glad to to speak with
her. And yeah, I’m um we talked a little bit before about politics. We’re not going to get into that today. So who is
Saw? What kind of work does she do? Okay. So, it’s just a lady.
I am 52 years old. I have a husband and a son and a girl.
The son is 30 years old. The girl is 17. Um, I’m CBA qualified. I got to
Australia when I was 17. Now I’m 52. Um I used to do accounting but uh for the
past 10 years I’ve been mortgage broking. Lately I get involved in property development etc as my way up to
retirement so I could do more charity and um but I’m here to talk about my
passion. Okay. Um it’s all about mental health and um Buddha helped me but I’m
not in distri I’m not in any way distributing religion and but I want to appreciate who helped
me that’s why I mentioned his name um but you know I also suffer
mental health issue when I was young and I was so young under 10 that I didn’t
know how to get help and now I learned enough that I forgive
forget and I got over and that’s why I wanted to help others what I can not
everyone going to resonate with me I understand you know but um I’m here out
there opening up my story to help others okay well great yeah you know so so many
people that get interested in Buddhism you know there’s other reasons but a lot of people I meet is what I call the
ducador right come through the ducador or when things get really um let’s just
say really challenging and there’s no way to deny it anymore. That’s kind of how I did. But like what would you say
um what do you feel comfortable sharing about your story? Um and then how did you address it and maybe how did some of
the Buddhist uh Buddhist teachings um help with that? And uh you know it’s
it’s okay if we do talk about orthodox or modern Buddhism or whatever. But I I
don’t even like to word use the word ism. That’s a a western thing to me. I just look at it as okay here’s um a very
wise being um or even beyond that right it means awake and this is he shared
some things and he said go check it out for yourself. To me it’s just okay this
is reality. this is how I this is um the best um see seeing things for how they
actually are and then the best way and the best way to go about it. That’s how I look at it. Not as a religion, you
know, because there’s nothing to believe. You don’t have to believe anything. Yeah. No, no. See it for yourself. That’s what
he said. You know, like nobody helping you, no God helping
you. We got to help ourself. But he gave us the strategy and we have to practice
to find ourself you know we looking outside you know we finding others every
day but what about you you know and like people who are successful who are busy
also um busy busy but we never look at ourselves so we don’t usually look after
ourselves so we die young etc you know so it’s just a thing about balancing you
still have to live your life etc. Um so in the beginning what you said in my
story I I don’t mind sharing okay I started on social media um about this um
you know Facebook because I’m good at it mortgage broking I do video to add value
people come to me so but then social media they see me as a woman you know
what whatever I say however I look I look I don’t look pretty sexy right but
then people see me as a woman But here I think you guys have the right audience.
So that helped me you know. So yeah and Buddha even said you know um like
he said there’s only sand like the sw and the water in the wall. Okay there’s
a lot of swah in the world but he was only able to help handful of swah you
know. So you know what he teach is not a relating it’s the facts of life but not
everyone will resonate with him now same here you know I’m not saying any method
is right or wrong there’s different way and different people resonate with different thing I’m here out there if
even if I could help one person you know because I needed help and I didn’t know
how to get help and in every develop country there’s a lot of like help life.
I think we should promote more. You know, people who need help, they too
scared to come to you. We have to be like come come you know they may be
adult I was a child you know child don’t naturally know but even if you are adult
you people who are suffering especially mental health and that it’s a very gray area they don’t know how to get help
they’re very confused we got to promote our help you know that’s why I’m here to do what I can okay um also I think we
should promote helpline etc every developed country has all these help lines Right. Um yeah, even Australia,
Australia is very safe with gun etc. all these fightings and can’t I don’t know
what do you call you know m uh yeah I don’t know what they call but uh but there was Sydney famous beach
bondai you know there was a terror attack uh last week a week ago or so um
yeah 15 Jewish people died a lot of people injured um so it’s all to do with
mental health okay uh back to my story okay is it too long you want to cuz you
want me to go on specifically. No, I would just I’ll just echo that. You know, uh well-being, you know, the
um I don’t know if you’re referring to the suta, the handful of leaves, you know, where he he said he took the monks
of the forest, you know, what’s what’s more in my hand. The leaves in my hand are leaves in the forest. Of course there’s the leaves in the forest but in
his hand he said this is but this is I know everything or you know my knowledge is as vast as all the leaves in the
forest but all I teach is this handful of leaves suffering and the end of suffering or duka and the end of dooka
or we could say stress and the end of stress or even unsatisfactoriness and the end of unsatisfactoriness that
gets more subtle but yeah stress people can relate with this right and where do we turn so it this is about well-being