Podcast | Healthcare System Audit From Back Office Supervisor “Ron”

Given Integrating Presence’s long list of healing modalities and resources; occasionally providing commentary about care during Denny K Miu‘s Saturday “Mindfulness of Qi : Mindful Fitness & Yi Jin Jing” and “Mindful Practice for Everyone : Each Differently Abled”; and an upcoming “Ask Us Anything” guest who focuses on redefining care, it seems appropriate to interview “Ron”.

Ron is not his real name. He previously worked several (supervisory) roles in quality and project management on the revenue cycle side within an emergency department, within a directed mission department, at a large healthcare system.

Along with a brief bio and role descriptions some of the topics we get into include:

  • Physicians basically only spending 7 minutes per patient, per visit for one item
  • Personal responsibility
  • Prominence of Medicare and Medicaid
  • Push for profits and efficiency often times over quality of care
  • Related insurance industry undertakings and operations including details and examples
  • Leadership
  • Potential solutions:
    • Food availability and equality
    • Nurse practitioners and physician assistants
    • Reimbursements based on quality of outcome

A Healthcare System Audit From Back Office Supervisor “Ron”
Audio only version

The raw unedited YouTube transcription of this podcast:

easiest way
this is josh devil from integratingpresence.com and as some of you know denny came you
and i do a monthly ask us anything this coming month we’re having on a guest
who’s talking about redefining caregiving and so i thought i’d sit down virtually with
ron here which is not his real name ron why don’t you mention well a brief bio in
what you where this all fits and how it’s related sure yeah when it comes to
questions of redefining health and health care and how people operate in that space of course a lot of the
attention is focused on insurance government roles the the impact of major
hospitals your private physician things of that nature and there’s a lot of opinions around that there’s a lot of
politics around that and i think everybody has their own vantage point so
maybe what we can talk about is a little bit of the vantage point that i could provide as someone who
has worked in hospital systems and for a major player across multiple
states uh you know nearly eight to 10 billion dollars in annual revenue so a
pretty large health care system where i had the opportunity to work as a frontline person on the revenue cycle
side within an emergency department within a hospital direct admission department also had the
opportunity to supervise and manage teams within that direct hospital
climate as well as several roles in quality and project management within
the revenue cycle organization of what we might call a back office type of concerns and that’s where we’re
getting into contracts authorizations insurance company behavior client behavior things of that nature so
just some of the things that we’ve seen some of the things that might be questions uh in regard to you know how
does this work how could it be better what are some of the obvious flaws that you see both
not necessarily from a medical standpoint because i’m not clinical but from a bird’s eye view of seeing how the
clinical side works and then as well as that how the insurance and people’s approach to
things impacts their care and then we can connect that to really what is the broader agenda and
purpose of having a healthcare system what should it look like and are we on the right path to that
this is a perfect setup yes all those things are of of great interest especially in the hour we’re in as well
so yeah um please dive right in yeah so i think the first thing is when
we talk about health care and we talk about health so much of what we experience in a
actual clinical setting especially if you’re getting into this is an emergency or this is urgent
or sadly even if you are setting up an appointment with your primary is focused
on the old pay for seat for service model so while there have been movements and the
government through cms claims that they’re really looking for quality and outcomes one of the things that’s a bad
rock is if you go in to see your physician you’re going to be asked for your top issue of today you know what is
it that we’re dealing with today and that’s going to be if you’re lucky a seven minute visit with your physician
now you might be there for 45 minutes you might wait for 15 before you get back you might wait for 10 while you’re
in the room but at best you’re talking about seven minutes with the physician and half of that they’re going to spend
typing notes into the computer so not a lot of focus holistically there if you
have any kind of an urgent need again it’s going to be one primary item and we know
from a health standpoint that there are multiple factors that
integrate and if you are operating by piecemeal you’re really not going to get
the kind of advice or get the kind of treatment that’s going to enable you to connect the dots together it would take
certainly more than seven minutes to take any kind of a chronic condition and talk through the diet and exercise
requirements as well as limitations but the system itself is more or less set up
to drive you to how can we look at one item today and then how can we
medicate that by giving you a prescription so that these numbers start to look better and that’s that seems to
be one of the problems because if you’re truly interested in establishing full health how are you going to get there
when we’re slicing portions of that out and just saying well what is your particular issue today you know are you
struggling with your diabetes was your cholesterol too high you know did you sprain an ankle some of these things are
acute and can be handled simply but others are actually you know more complex they’re more interwoven but that
doesn’t doesn’t blend well into being able to drop a claim and bill it out to an insurance company so we we do have an
issue there where the focus on on wholeness and well-being isn’t really a primary thing that’s built into the
system instead getting you in and out as quickly as possible so that we can code that and drop a claim and bill insurance
is really still the goal regardless of the lip service paid to quality of outcomes wow so we’ve got um basically
it’s structured for a one item thing from the client or are the patients
seven minutes and a prescription basically from what i gather this has been structured just for the convenience
of insurance companies is that too inaccurate to put or if it is when did this type of structure uh
system structure come about because you know you look back on old shows or you talk to grandparents and stuff and they
have more of a doctors and health care providers didn’t seem to operate this way for the most part i don’t know when
the time period would be yeah and that’s when we look at the trend line you know
there are things that we should highlight with the introduction of the medicare and
medicaid services uh one of the things that i think most most folks aren’t necessarily aware of
they see it in their end bill but they don’t know the origins is going back to
the way that those claims were paid so prior to some of the legislation in late
60s early 70s time period when we’re talking about reimbursement rates you know those old school doctors that were
running you know local clinics would be billing for the actual services rendered and this is very similar to
what you see if you go to a veterinarian it’s pretty similar to what you see if you go to a dentist office where you you
don’t have the same penetration of insurance companies and you don’t have the involvement of the federal
government into that sphere to the same extent so what happens if you go to the optometrist
whether you have insurance or not is you end up paying a fee that’s
relatively similar to what that optometrist actually wants to charge you so if it’s going to be 50 for an eye
exam and that’s what they’re looking for basically they charge 50. within medical insurance one of the
biggest problems that we have is the contractual rates that are set by the
federal government are set by the federal government itself so instead of paying the full charges what they’ll do
is they’ll pay their percentage and they set and cap those rates themselves so you end up
with percentages that can vary state by state if you’re looking at a medicaid program and they can vary service line
by service line for medicare but the bottom line is this the bill will be for a dollar and they’ll say we’re going to
pay 30 cents on that so what ends up happening predictably is if you actually needed a dollar then you’re only getting
paid 30 cents you’re going to raise those prices you know three to four times the rate of course the other thing
that happens when you’re not being paid the full amount is you have to start compensating for that so if i have four
patients in an hour and only one of the four are going to pay that i’m lagging behind in terms of the revenue i need to
make you know i have three slots to fill in terms of actual patient payments in order to keep the lights on in my staff
so what i have to do then is i have to start becoming more efficient at the same time that’s happening we know
there’s a general push in society and the organization i was working for very clearly
had a push toward profitability over people it was much more of an organization run from a business
standpoint a maximization of efficiencies and profit opportunities as compared to
taking care of patients at the start so you have difficulties in terms of your reimbursement you have these
capital rates where the actual bill is for ten thousand dollars but uh federal
legislation says well we’re only going to cover to 1500 and all that is a write-off if you
do not have insurance of course you’re not looking at any of those contractual rates you don’t have any of the benefits
uh from those government uh determinations instead you just get those really high bills and that’s part
of the the situation you see with individuals getting these forty thousand sixty thousand eighty thousand dollar
bills well if you have blue cross blue shield may have a contract they’re not paying that percentage if you have medicare
they’re not paying that percentage and that’s part of where the numbers get so high and why you don’t see the same type
of behavior in a dental environment say you need a root canal it’s expensive
but you’re not going to walk out of their own 20 000 because the three to four that it may cost or if you’re lucky
last is actually the amount that they’re trying to to recoup um yeah i don’t think i’m really uh disillusioned uh
about the environment as a whole i think for me it was just a particular thing for the organization i was working uh
for that i didn’t like the way that they were conducting business the that system that healthcare system had
changes uh in the top leadership position within my time period we had a complete flip in terms of the
c-suite and the mentality that went along with that had changed so when i was first joining with the
organization there was a different mentality and more of a
patient-oriented concern and then that changed and refocused on the profitability and then things of that
nature so personally i still think there’s a lot of value a lot of good available in those systems but the board
has to appoint people and select people who are actually going to put patients first so
i still think it’s a good industry i just i think that it can be vulnerable to individuals running it for their own
their own headlines or their own uh personal well-being as opposed to the organizations that seems pretty common
with folks in your situation that yeah the leadership comes and goes and some are more conducive to
you know goodness well-being and actual care and health than than other leadership teams like you mentioning
before that seems to be a pretty common criticism across the board what are some
kind of fixes or solutions or maybe some right questions we need to be asking to
short of scrapping the whole thing which i don’t think is going to happen anytime soon or even be possible i mean if so it
would have to be some kind of bridge or transition so if if that’s something you
would happen to be for then yeah what would be kind of a transition what kind of uh solutions seem more obvious and
then maybe which ones don’t seem as obvious and then short term through long term i
think there are two things that jump to mind to me one is an item of personal responsibility
and possibility and that’s in the domain of diet and food availability just when
we look at the impact that diet has on overall health outcomes and well-being
for individuals we know that the links are there we know that the proper decisions uh in terms of diet and
what to eat what not to eat what kind of items we should be consuming has a tremendous end impact but we also know
that there’s pretty heavy involvement of the government and subsidizing the types of things that we shouldn’t be uh
we shouldn’t be eating so you know if you make you know your murder zero a list of all the things that are going to
cause you harm you’re going to have things that are ultimately all in some way subsidized from your you
know your corn to your cheese your high fructose corn syrup cattle ranches all of the things that
essentially taste really good and they create this just incredible plate for you when when you’re hungry but the
actual contents of it are not very good so we should be asking some questions about why our government uh props up so much of a
diet and so much of an agricultural system that is not beneficial for us personally as consumers i think you know
as our representatives the the government really should be looking for how can we
provide a healthier population how can we push things in a better direction within that you have questions of food
availability and equality you know we know when we get into socioeconomic status the lower you are
in that ses ranking the higher the probability is that you’re going to have a wider range of chronic diseases and
the less likelihood that you’re going to have good access to high quality food and nutrients so it’s
not a mistake that you see high rates of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome
in poverty-stricken areas it’s a result of yes exercise but just as much the
quality of the food that’s available in the local environment so ron let’s say i’m your
gp your general practitioner and start talking about food won’t i just refer
you to a nutritionist i think from what i’ve seen that’s a pretty limited sphere of opportunity uh going
back to the the general uh structure of sort of rushing people through most of the food problems that we have
we have a correlated uh generic drug that’s gonna work for that so you’ve got your cholesterol you’ve got your blood
pressure drugs you’ve got your metformin for your diabetes that’s particularly more common what you
will typically see with a nutritionist is somebody who’s new to a particular disease a lot of times you’re going to
see that more limited to someone with like an onset of type 1 diabetes where you have to now regulate this blood
sugar and diet some of the autoimmune diseases you’ll have that opportunity sometimes
if you’re having dermatology issues then you can do some of the food sampling but it’s not a
particularly common thing for people to actually delve into other than just to say your diet should
be better but in terms of nutritionists i think that’s a great direction to go in and to have
those individuals available particularly because the the food itself is so complicated you know it’s easy to say eat a certain
way but we find very quickly because foods aren’t made of just one ingredient that
when you increase the amount of carbs you know and decrease the amount of fat then you got a problem with that or if you have to
keep low carbs then suddenly you’re looking at foods that are potentially going to have too much fat like
putting together a balanced diet is a challenge but it’s even more of a challenge when companies and local
organizations of local farmers things like that are competing against
others who have subsidies and so they’re not playing on a level playing field and then if you bring in some of the
difficulties that uh that may come in with having to use certain type of seeds
in order to qualify for bank loans we know that it’s not as easy
to to approach things on a large scale for that quality so i mean that that’s one
of the things i think is a is a potential where people can have more control um what i see
totally is and i was you know and i don’t know if it’s changed since i’ve heard last that doctors really don’t
spend much time uh receiving training and education on food and diet compared
to all the other things they train and study with yeah and that’s that’s really the case and and i’ll say
in the years that i worked in an emergency room and and i was present for
hundreds of evaluations uh because my role just kind of permitted me to be in in the vicinity uh and they’re just
there really weren’t conversations happening around food you know if somebody comes in for high blood pressure obviously they’re gonna say oh
you should watch your sodium but how to make that practical and how to push that forward holistically that’s
not really addressed i haven’t heard it addressed it’s not that there aren’t some physicians who are doing it the
problem is it just it takes a while to work through that plus you have to be you know kind of educated in that area
yourself and we know there’s the joke of course about the quality of hospital food and things like that where it’s
really not prioritized because it’s a reductionist model you know we’re not
we’re not trying to solve everything with kale it’s saying well we go down to the cellular level what’s out of balance
let’s put it back in balance and you know in all fairness this is not necessarily the medical profession’s
fault or you know they can give you advice on how to solve it but it really is is more of a question of politics uh
and an economy for you know citizens to ask our government why are you why are
you subsidizing this business inside of that business when this isn’t leading to healthy outcomes
what about the quality of the drinking water the air things like that i’m not sure if this is true or not i
heard it but i definitely i never bothered to fact check but i did hear that russia was focused on converting their
agriculture food from regular you know western style agricultural to an organic
agriculture within the next uh five to ten years and it was classified as a
national security issue because of the impact it has on the actual citizenry so i’ve heard that i don’t know if that
is true or it’s just something that i heard from someone who heard it from somebody but that’s a factor in how we uh where we’re
at when we go to the doctors in regard to things that i i think help
one of the trends that’s emerging from the medical field and seems to be growing is an increased uh use of nurse
practitioners and physician assistants that are overseen by attendings or a primary with
technical setting but don’t require the same level of schooling and the same investment up
front in order to get to that level and i think that’s a really good trend because for a lot of individuals access
to care is the primary issue you know and being able to
go through relatively simple things and have somebody there who can give them decent advice and and for many people
struggling with chronic issues from lifestyle choices and from medication elements they may not have
really had the opportunity to sit down and speak with someone about that in depth the more that we integrate nurse
practitioners and physician assistants who are well versed in the basics but aren’t
necessarily going to be making diagnoses on extremely complex cases the more opportunity there is for
healthcare to be available for everybody the model itself it does lend to a restricted number of end
physicians we know in any given year like right now we’ve just started another
term you know at all the medical schools we know that there’s a certain amount of applicants and there’s a there’s a
certain amount that’s accepted quite a few people would like to be doctors quite a few people apply to
medical school and don’t necessarily make it through and don’t qualify as physicians but that doesn’t mean that
those individuals weren’t capable of providing quite a bit in that domain and in that sphere but we’ve set up a lot of
somewhat arbitrary rules around how we do our training and what those requirements are in order to actually
produce a general physician you know someone who is able to just handle the
day-to-day uh you know and that is unfortunate because those restrictions into who can go to medical school and
how high you have to score on your tests and the types of residency programs and things you have
to do just to become a doctor some of that is pretty darn extraordinary when
you’re not necessarily going to be dealing with super complicated cases
day in and day out a lot of it’s going to be the same sort of thing over and over again you know when it’s flu season
this flu season when it’s a science infection it’s a sinus infection and when you’re diagnosing diseases and
you’re working within the you know pharmaceutical model oftentimes you’re just prescribing a broad spectrum
antibiotic and you may have not even been right about what you thought it was but since it’s broad spectrum you know
it works and and you get the good outcome so i think it’s a it’s a positive when we
start expanding the domain of health care practitioners whether it be nutrition is coming on board and being
connected to that in a better way or broadening the field of who qualifies
as a practitioner the food thing is very interesting and i’m going to restrain myself from the the gmo organic comments
but yeah it seems fairly obvious to me i was just curious how many did you have any nutritionists on staff there
at the hospital we had one and that individual worked essentially a per diem
type situation so if you were admitted to the hospital
really for onset of type 1 diabetes then you would set up an appointment with
this individual you’d fill out a 10-page questionnaire on your dietary habits and then she would have like one or two
counseling sessions with you to talk about monitoring you know your carbohydrates and watch out for simple
sugars and you know monitor the glucose and your a1 numbers keeping those in
good shape and things of that nature but um that was the often the extent of it they’re very
very few conditions other than type 1 diabetes would ever come in to see her
and there was only one person on staff and and she wasn’t there all the time if she had an appointment book and so if
there were appointments on tuesday she’d be there but it’s not as if that was a standard part of it to say
let’s do multi-dimensional rounding uh let’s have a team that can really interface with people on all
levels you know and it’s it it’s very expensive but you know if you were
uh on some kind of you know gold plan you know you’re you’re jeff bezos or something and you’re going into your own
you know private wing of the hospital you know they’re going to bring in a full multi-disciplinary team and you’re
going to have more there than just one position it’s it’s kind of like they’ll load up on
physician specialties so you can have a pulmonologist in there you can have cardiologists in there you can have the
hospitalist that has the admission is overseeing your stay and and they’ll stack those guys up
as much as they need to but some of the day-to-day things that actually are the building blocks of why someone’s sick
you don’t have that as much so you’re not going to have a nutritionist on those rounds you’re not going to have a physical therapist or
exercise physiologist like there’s not even really such a thing
within the medical sphere you have to be like on a sports team to have a doctor who’s there to also
help with your your physical stuff so you know those are things that they reflect personal responsibility but what
that ends up happening is the patient comes in you treat a portion of the illness control that to some extent
but you haven’t addressed anything root cause so then they’re going to keep on coming back and that works for the
medical system because again we want to treat one symptom for today we want to have a
visit for seven minutes that we booked for 15 and drop a claim and build that out for
and to be able to have a metric and a traceable outcome which you don’t really have if what you’re documenting is a
20-minute conversation about overall health and well-being plus in all fairness how many patients are actually
going to comply with those recommendations anyway you know you could have like the patch adams clinic where you know it’s we’re gonna
you know heal with laughter and we’re gonna do all these positive things what percentage of people are actually going
to benefit from such an open-ended environment what percentage would just simply list and say yeah then yeah it
sounds great and then not go and do it anyway in many ways the medical model
is around because it works if i just have to take a pill and that’s all i have to do yeah i might do that if i had
to change my entire lifestyle probably not great point seems so obvious once it’s thrown out there but it’s not not
on the forefront of many people’s minds that have to go visit doctors and whatnot i thought it was fascinating too
to actually kind of find out how the food industry and the subsidies
actually kind of intersect with the health care system because
trying to find our you know suss out the bolts and nuts behind you know how that
how that would work and of course a lot of this does boil down to the money and how much that affects everything the uh
i was just curious too about how how many staff members are on the physician side oh
um because i was just trying to get a reference point for like there’s only one nutritionist for how many you know
other um physician related employees oh yeah that that’s a good point yeah so it that particular location had about
450 beds so it would be one nutritionist for 450
potentially admitted patients uh plus the volume coming in through an outpatient environment which includes an
er so it’s it’s pretty stacked uh in terms of you’re talking a ratio of five
ten thousand to one uh in terms of opportunity to actually meet a patient
so that’s the physician number that tends to vary because
most of these organizations are working with physician groups that are external vendors so you’ll have a vendor
that provides ed physicians you know just like any other like a maid service where you know
i’m gonna have i know i’m going to have three maids here to help clean tomorrow i don’t know which three so i contract
out to make sure that i always have three positions available so that that comes up
it’s a good question too because you’re talking about ratios and you know what
number of patients is handled by any particular clinician and how much time does that provide you know a
physician in an er environment is usually going to carry 12 to 15 patients
at any given time and that’s assuming a normal level of inflow you know if we have a
you know really heavy fluid season or if there’s an accident nearby things like that obviously the number is going to spike but on a normal day you’re going
to be juggling 12 to 15 at a time the entire day and so what are your limitations there
we’re going to run some tests and see nurses are typically handling three in
an ed and up to 10 to 12 on a medical floor for admitted patients
higher number on the medical floor because they’re stable you know so if i work in a cardiac unit and i have eight
patients with all due respect to the individual eight people involved they’re probably going to be relatively similar
so we’re monitoring values we’re rounding and making sure that everything is okay but we’re not dealing with distinct new
things that are coming up so you’ll see a higher ratio of patients to individual
nurses but at the end of the day that ratio controls the staffing so if
we are going to have uh one nurse for every eight patients on the medical floor
then if we have 16 patients vetted then we’re going to have two nurses if we have
nine we were probably gonna end up seeing one and and they’re going to start fixing nurses out that
means that there isn’t the extra time so the time to actually go through and maybe do some of those more ambitious uh
things that a physician or nurse might like to and with that extra time i have to always remember that that extra time
is very closely and carefully accounted for and as soon as it starts to appear
they send people home to make sure that there isn’t any waste in that system and again that goes back to the efficiency
trying to max the profits and maximizing the profits goes back to the
capped rates that you see from government payers and it also goes back to some of the underhanded
techniques that insurance carriers on the commercial side like a uhc and blue cross
will do where they’ll authorize services and then not pay because they say something changed or wasn’t medically
necessary or they’ll set up systems that make it more difficult to get notifications to them so that they can
deny on technical merits to say we weren’t notified therefore even though our you know this
person came in they were in an automobile crash they were an anonymous patient because of the trauma
nevertheless you didn’t notify us so we’re not going to cover this day there’s an awful lot of money
healthcare providers lose that insurance companies keep in their pocket except
for of course the bonus that goes to the ceo that comes from games that they play in little schemes around authorization of
services patients don’t typically see that part of it because it is an internal battle between
the healthcare system and the insurance company and so when there’s a denial or
whatnot for an authorization issue or a partial denial it just gets written off but that write-off is a loss of revenue
and that loss of revenue then means you have less and less margin means you can’t afford to have doctors and nurses
not doing anything other than treating patients and treating patients in the strictly medical model now that we’ve
delved into a few things on the administrative side and covered the physician side what else in an overview
does the administration deal with and then i guess just in general how does the how does the board i guess
overseeing everything and the administration and the physicians where did they come into so i’m thinking maybe
there’s some of the standard hiring and firing practices anything that’s
outsourced versus in-house let’s see what are some other um just general
areas of the whole thing that haven’t been mentioned yet well you’ve got you know when it comes to the administrator
it’s a unique business model because the patients don’t ever come to see
an administrator you know they’re not there to see somebody in a back office they’re not there to speak a hospital
present they’re there to see a doctor and because of that the face of the business and the purpose of the business
is separated from the people who are supposed to sort of be making sure that it’s run well and
as a result there is bloat there there are incompetencies that come in because
the standalone business operation of how we would monitor those authorizations how we would pursue claims and
contracting and make sure that we are availing ourselves of our full legal rights those things are not necessarily
the top priority for back office staff so much as it is hey it’s a friday
afternoon yet and that happens because they’re not running an independent company patients are still going to
doctors doctors are still doing the best that they can but behind that it’s one of those things
where there’s a hole in the bucket and and there are a lot of missed revenue opportunities you know
the system i was working for we would see multiple mistakes made by individuals
responsible for securing authorizations and uh i could think of one employee
whose work i occasionally checked wasn’t in my department just one of the functions so i would see some of the
authorizations that she failed to do on admissions and and this one employee just on a handful of cases i randomly
audited uh cost the company cost the healthcare system at least two million dollars and that’s in actual payments
not just in what would have been charges driven down by a percentage and that’s one person so administratively when you
look at what is it we’re doing how are they handling it what’s the culture and expectation and
the standard for taking care of the business taking care of the patients
because there’s such a separation of whom we’re coming in to see versus who’s
actually handling the back end process and there’s a lot of people in that business that you wouldn’t come to see
they wouldn’t be able to run their own business and the model that they follow wouldn’t be successful so
that that’s something that’s a concern when you look at it from the inside is you know it’s bad enough that the
insurance company is playing games but you really shouldn’t be making it easier i never
really observed any significant difference in the quality of care in regard to internal versus external i
certainly have heard people with spousey opinions of you know like oh that’s this is a contractor group so they don’t care
much but if it was internal i don’t think it makes too much of a difference at least in my observations because
there’s such a high standard required for physicians you know to get through that training to get into that field
outside of a few with difficult personalities where that personality might interfere with care you don’t see
a drop off like you would in other areas where we’re outsourcing say our customer service isn’t going to be domestic it’s
we’re going to send it international and we’re going to give people funny names and nobody’s going to be able to understand sort of their accents
you don’t really experience that the pressures don’t change in terms of if you have a vendor say in
an er they’re paid per patient under most models so there’s some incentive to
cycle through patients as quickly as possible but the truth is how do you know if that’s impacting
their care if you had people in-house they would also be pressured by the administrator to see as
many patients as possible for the revenue so you can kind of look at that either way and say well hey they might
even be less responsive to that pressure because at least they don’t work for the
hospital that they’re actually stationed at so there’s nobody physically in their face that can be telling them hurry up hurry up so they can conduct their
business appropriately and then go back to their boss you know off-site and and sort of share that they did things as
they should so i haven’t seen that being a major thing i think the
the real challenge for the board of direct is to continue to push an evolution into
the reimbursement based upon quality of outcomes the quality of outcomes really is dependent
on the quality of care as well as those inputs and things that we’ve touched on in terms of personal lifestyle choices
of the diet exercise and making those more accessible as choices uh
for individuals who may not know the pathway or have the opportunity how can that be created
if we actually were looking at an environment where you were reimbursed for quality of care you know say at a
primary patient came in they had these three chronic conditions that can be influenced can be ameliorated uh
reimbursement rates going up uh from the the government sponsors as well as hopefully commercial carriers as those
numbers begin to drop that would be good that’s where they’re heading but it’s still you know pretty much still uh
coded off and then billed out just fee for service fee for service so
i think that’s you know from the political standpoint from the interfacing with the economic portion uh
continuing to put forth the idea that the more we can invest in holistic care
and going beyond just a strictly medical model the better outcomes you’re going to get for the patients and
understanding that it’s an area that both patients and probably physicians could use
additional educations of how to address things beyond you know having the
medication as your intervention for pretty much everything sure and i’m hearing this more and more and i think
the writing’s on the wall now and they’re starting to see the writing on the walls as far as more holistic
systems well thanks for doing this and is there anything else you’d like to leave us with no no i i don’t think so i
think it’s a it’s an interesting topic and you know i think we’re all very much concerned that we i think we get lost
sometimes in worrying about particulars of the insurance and what should be and should
people have it or not and you know there there’s a deeper uh need there just for how do we make
ourselves healthy and how do we benefit our community the best that we can and
looking for a model that is is based upon that and you know allocating the funds where they need to to be and kind
of making sure that we we balance out the the money uh that that’s floating
around there to make sure that we were able to do that we shouldn’t uh somebody who’s worked on the revenue side you
know it’s a little frustrating to see you like if you look at the stock value of a uhc unh trading going up you know
250 300 over the course of five years great and i know there’s acquisitions to it
but it’s not so great if you have those profits happening um that are coming from premiums and they’re coming from
non-paid bills to healthcare providers it’s not so great if it’s happening in an environment where patients are only
getting seven minutes with their physician where small rural hospitals are having to close because
they can’t afford to pay the bills and things of that nature so we have to be mindful that as much as we love
profit we need to make sure that the system works for everybody and because health
is so integral to our day-to-day experiences both for us and and for others as our health impacts
them that’s something that i look at and think we shouldn’t politicize as much as
we should just look at it and make sure that at the end of the day uh the health care system has the
needs to actually pursue quality of care uh because they certainly can’t do that if they’re not getting paid for the care
that they render indeed lots of great points thanks again for doing this all right thank you

More podcasts:

Podcast | A Better Future For Humanity? In Conversation with Randi Green Integrating Presence

In this sit-down, Randi Green and I talk about some of the implications of the future timelines. It all seems like Sci-fi and some of the topics have been covered by the movie industry. However, things are as always far more complex and the sciences are far beyond what we know of yet. Some of the topics mentioned: AI, quantum computers, my Wisdom app talk aboutChatGPT, Kissinger, panic, Google, D-wave, Einstein-Rosen Bridges, infrastructure, finance, health, psychology, singularity, timelines, wormholes, bridge between future and past, stasis chambers, the cubes and their directives, terraforming, CERN, particle colliders, frequency based reality, Purdue University's Sentient World Simulation, Time Wave Continuum, Turing test, consciousness, will, El*n M*sk, Holographic Teaching Systems, Looking Glass, psyops, particles, allowances, intent, and some of the solutions from the future.
  1. Podcast | A Better Future For Humanity? In Conversation with Randi Green
  2. Heart Practices | Feb 23, 2023 “Meditation Q & A With Wendy Nash” #06
  3. Podcast | Travel And Moving To Expand Perception And Awareness
  4. Podcast | The Noble Truth Of Dukkha: Buddhism And Beyond With Randi Green (Part 2)
  5. Podcast | Trauma, Teachings And Textual Interpretations: Buddhism And Beyond With Randi Green (Part 1)

Published by josh dippold


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: